Even if we conclude that value - added measures are not confounded, we will never know
the true effectiveness of a teacher working in all different classroom situations.
Not exact matches
It goes on to say that the only
true gauge
of teacher quality is «classroom
effectiveness.»
For comparison, and to distinguish measurement error from
true differences in
teacher effectiveness, the authors ran similar correlations with randomly separated groups
of students.
Inversely,
teachers who are awarded tenure might be observed as ineffective one, two, and / or three years following, not because their
true level (s)
of effectiveness change, but because
of the error in the estimates that causes such instabilities to occur.
As far as I'm concerned, the (small) differences they report in achievement might as well be real or
true, but to claim that
teachers caused the differences because
of their
effectiveness, or lack thereof, is certainly false and untrue.
High - performing nations have demonstrated the
effectiveness of a different model, one that holds
teachers accountable as
true professionals.
Conclusions drawn from one test might not serve as an accurate picture
of a
teacher's
true effectiveness.
The same is
true for the very mixed results
of studies about the
effectiveness of TFA
teachers compared to non-TFA
teachers.
Simply by adding superficial «bolt on» wellbeing sessions without addressing the day - to - day practice are merely token gestures and will not create a
true culture
of high morale and
teacher effectiveness.
First, assuming readily available measures
of teacher effectiveness actually measure
true teacher effectiveness, an assumption to which we return below, the differences between seniority and
effectiveness - based layoffs are larger and more persistent than we anticipated.
Rather, most
teachers recognize that because large - scale accountability tests don't provide a
true picture
of their classroom
effectiveness, those tests don't give them the information they need to evaluate and, if necessary, alter their instructional strategies.
Kane's research was,
of course, used to support the claim that bad
teachers are causing the disparities that he cited, regardless
of the fact the inverse could be also, equally, or even more
true — that the value - added measures used to measure
teacher effectiveness in these schools are biased by the very nature
of the students in these schools that are contributing their low test scores to such estimates.