Sentences with phrase «true form for»

The Shadow Queen engages the battle with Mario and his partners; however, she believes Peach's body is too weak and returns to her true form for the final battle.

Not exact matches

It is true that the US did not persecute the Jews - or at least, as one Nazi lawyer remarked in 1936, it had not persecuted the Jews «so far» - but it had created a host of forms of second - class citizenship for other minority groups, including Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, Puerto Ricans and Native Americans, scattered all over the Union and its colonies.

If there is one overarching lesson that's worth noting from this whole experience, it's that overcoming fear of rejection and speaking out for something you believe in is the truest form of leadership.

America's fascination with true crime storytelling has existed for quite some time, with Truman Capote noting in the 1960s that he'd created a new art form (the «nonfiction novel») with In Cold Blood, his best - selling account of the gruesome murder of a Kansas family.

As new deals emerge, there is now time for venture capitalists to be thoughtful, to do real due diligence, and to form true relationships with entrepreneurs.

True to form, several buyers of the flamethrower turned out to be scalpers, asking for huge markups for the limited - edition item.

This is especially true for small - and medium - sized enterprises (SMEs), which form the backbone of B.C.'s economy.

This is true anywhere in the world, but if you move to downtown Vegas and bring with you the entrepreneurial qualities of resiliency, resourcefulness, and optimism, you're much more likely to form a strong network of true friendships with people who have a bias for building new relationships, looking out for each other, and helping each other out.

For example, one trade credit policy form requires the policyholder to warrant, among other things, that (a) as of the execution of this Insurance Policy, it has no knowledge of any circumstance which could give rise to or increase the likelihood of a Loss; and (b) all of the information that it has provided and will provide to the Underwriter including, but not limited to, the information provided in the Application for Insurance, is and will be true and that no material information has been or will be withheFor example, one trade credit policy form requires the policyholder to warrant, among other things, that (a) as of the execution of this Insurance Policy, it has no knowledge of any circumstance which could give rise to or increase the likelihood of a Loss; and (b) all of the information that it has provided and will provide to the Underwriter including, but not limited to, the information provided in the Application for Insurance, is and will be true and that no material information has been or will be withhefor Insurance, is and will be true and that no material information has been or will be withheld.

If Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is true to form during his two congressional appearances this week, look for him to continue speaking forthrightly about things like inflation and deficits.

The opposite is true for other forms of trading.

There is a total lack of undisputed examples (fossilized or living) of the millions of transitional forms («missing links») required for evolution to be true.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

The same is true for any argument about extra-terrestrial life in the cosmos in any form (even so - called «ghosts» and other phenomenon).

However it is true, the location of many church plants are in wealthy areas and therefore Christians for a large part coming form polite middle class families.

«For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near.

Yes, it is true that looking at the trees, we don't see God, but when we look to our fellow human beings and doing things for them, we acknowledge God's existence in the universe in the form of love.

At Isaiah 45, it says: «For this is what Jehovah has said, the Creator of the heavens, He the true God, the Former of the earth and the Maker of it, He the One who firmly established it, who did not create it simply for nothing, who formed it even to be inhabited.&raqFor this is what Jehovah has said, the Creator of the heavens, He the true God, the Former of the earth and the Maker of it, He the One who firmly established it, who did not create it simply for nothing, who formed it even to be inhabited.&raqfor nothing, who formed it even to be inhabited.»

If it is true that the creator constantly supports, preserves, and renews His world, if everything new that appears in the world has come and continuously comes from His plan for creation and from His creative power, then in some way it has to come into contact with the reality that forms the object of the sciences.»

This time would confirm in them what they already believed to be true: that Jesus died for their sins, was raised from the dead and appeared to them in risen form.

Officials set a sacred image on the ground before him, and he lifts his foot, knowing that what he is doing «is not just for form's sake,» but a true trampling of everything he has ever known to be beautiful and holy.

After attending the conference I decided that the obsession with individual rights — the right to make money or to write, say or do what I please — should be exposed for what it is: a form of fundamentalism that accepts one worldview as absolute and rejects all others as encroachments on the true faith.

Is it the true and unalterable one which bears his essential characteristics, or the one which he took up for our sakes when he assumed the form of a servant?»

Furthermore, Tillich is incapable of true Yes - saying, for he can not accept an authentically contemporary form of Existenz, and he insists that Existenz must culminate in anxiety and despair.

To thank God for his bountiful provision for our needs with no thought of the many who suffer is a form of self - centeredness contrary to the mood of true prayer.

thats why we have to debate more and realize that our diferrences are just superficial misunderstanding, that to be united to a common belief in him can be logical and true only with the belief that we are evolving to attain a better relationship for all of us.Proven by science that all humans evolved from one parent, who evolved from lower forms of life, who evolved from pure energy through the big bang and guided by the spirit or conciousness of His Will.

In Jesus of Nazareth we find the true successor to the prophets of Israel, whose concern for the common man, and whose unconcern for the forms of ancient religion, He not only shared, but took to their logical conclusion.

The reason for doing this is because humans as they stand now are not capable of laying eyes on the Nines true astral forms due to the limitations of the collective whole your race has put into place that you know as your reality.

Indeed, theologians have celebrated the advent of the full worldliness of the world as an occasion for the epiphany of a truer form of faith.

This is especially true for young adults, who are still forming their views about life.

The Pope describes g ay marriage as «pseudo-matrimony» and declared that «The various forms of the dissolution of matrimony today, like free unions, trial marriages... by people of the same - s 3x, are rather expressions of an anarchic freedom that wrongly passes for true freedom of man.»

Lightfoot (1658) summed the need of one seeking true understanding (and not interpretation) up well: «For, first, when all the books of the New Testament were written by Jews, and among Jews, and unto them; and when all the discourses made there, were made in like manner by Jews, and to Jews, and among them; I was always fully persuaded, as of a thing past all doubting, that that Testament could not but everywhere taste of and retain the Jews» style, idiom, form, and rule of speaking.»

Too great an attachment to the datum self as a methodological starting point commits one unwittingly to solipsism, Hartshorne holds, since one could never achieve a sound epistemological basis for inferring the existence of anything beyond the datum self by this method.31 Further, if it is true that human beings are social all the way down, resistance to a literal participation in the being of a person by others (including their literal purposes) is also a form of impersonalism, according to Hartshorne's analysis — a charge from which Brightman would have reeled, had he realized that this was Hartshorne's implication.

To know that what is impenetrable for us really exists and manifests itself as the highest wisdom and the most radiant beauty, whose gross forms alone are intelligible to our poor faculties — this knowledge, this feeling... that is the core of the true religious sentiment.

When I came back to Christianity I came back to a form of the faith that gave me language for what I experienced to be true.

It is true that for Whitehead also sense perception involves the detached form.

The title has also proved highly provocative, for while the writers are using the word «myth» in its various technical senses of something that conveys a deep truth in a nonhistoric form, this word means in everyday speech something that is not true in any sense.

This does not mean that consumer and producer co-operatives in their present form can serve that purpose, for the co-operative movement has not developed in the direction of an organic alliance of production and consumption in a comprehensive communal form or a true federation of local societies.

In its final form, it is true, the consummation of life is still a matter of hope, but the earnest (arrbabon) of the inheritance is a present possession; and an arrhabon is a first instalment of a sum due accepted as a guarantee for the payment of the whole.

For while it is true that culture expresses itself through every form of communication: face - to - face, family, school, work, recreation, and so on, today television is assuming the dominant role of expression in our lives.

Furthermore, because it was directed toward another individual it could involve the desire for his good, and in its truest forms it had to do so.

The search by the Hebrews for a true understanding of God, from Abraham to Egypt, from the Promised Land to exile, witnesses as a whole to the love of God and to the requirement for justice on our part, and forms the matrix out of which Jesus» teachings developed.

Ely's qualification may be true; but, if God is to be concrete at all, he must preserve some values, because, for one reason, in Whitehead's system contemporary actualities do not form a concrete unity.

(Ps 37:11, 29) Isaiah 45:18 says: «For this is what Jehovah has said, the Creator of the heavens, He the [true] God, the Former of the earth and the Maker of it, He the One who firmly established it, who did not create it simply for nothing, who formed it even to be inhabited: «I am Jehovah, and there is no one else.&raqFor this is what Jehovah has said, the Creator of the heavens, He the [true] God, the Former of the earth and the Maker of it, He the One who firmly established it, who did not create it simply for nothing, who formed it even to be inhabited: «I am Jehovah, and there is no one else.&raqfor nothing, who formed it even to be inhabited: «I am Jehovah, and there is no one else.»

For Socrates, true love is a matter of ascent (this is the famous scala amoris) from the physical and the individual to the spiritual and universal: the purest form of love is love of the Forms, or of Being itself; love in its highest and best sense is undifferentiated and abstract.

Even if that were true, which I don't necessarily agree with, evidence of a creator god is not in any way, shape or form evidence for any specific god.

It is true that purposefulness is much harder to see in lifeless than in living things, since the element of appetite, of striving for a good as a goal, seems absent from the former, whereas it becomes increasingly important and evident in the latter in proportion to their complexity, their rank in the hierarchy of living forms.

For if it be true that the tide of evolutionary totalization sweeping us along requires, for its viability, not only that we must progress towards some form of irreversible unity, but also that this progress must be in the personal sphere, is not this a positive reason for believing that sooner or later something must happen in the world whereby certain basic conditions of the human phenomenon will undergo modificatiFor if it be true that the tide of evolutionary totalization sweeping us along requires, for its viability, not only that we must progress towards some form of irreversible unity, but also that this progress must be in the personal sphere, is not this a positive reason for believing that sooner or later something must happen in the world whereby certain basic conditions of the human phenomenon will undergo modificatifor its viability, not only that we must progress towards some form of irreversible unity, but also that this progress must be in the personal sphere, is not this a positive reason for believing that sooner or later something must happen in the world whereby certain basic conditions of the human phenomenon will undergo modificatifor believing that sooner or later something must happen in the world whereby certain basic conditions of the human phenomenon will undergo modification?

It is true that lie maintains the traditional form of the expectation (Luke 21.27 = Mark 13.26), but it is no longer for him a point of major concern.

He stands for an authentic form of American conservatism, one I'd argue is its best and truest form, even if it....