JH, that's
true in YOUR belief system, not all.
Not exact matches
In this world where it preaches tolerance for all except for when it comes to
true Christian
beliefs, a
belief that goes against the
system will never be given the time of day, even if said
belief is the TRUTH.
The
TRUE FACE of a religion is the
belief system and how the members of that faith reflect those
beliefs in THEIR ACTIONS.
I am guessing that perhaps though we are very different about what we believe and hold to be
true, we are very much alike
in our passion and our comfort our individual
systems of thought and
belief.
Compare that to the dogmatic stance of religion — a phony
belief system that starts and end with unproven manmade tribal myths, not open to
true debate, and that only changes
in order to maintain power over the gullible.
Actually Saraswati, you abandoned your original position that America is a «two party
system which only legislation is likely to change» and supported everything I said, which is that legislation is not required, and the number of parties is not designed into the
system, and it's not likely to happen because people here prefer to abandon their
true beliefs in favor of a lesser evil that might win.
By opposing these things the Church is a «sign of contradiction'to the
beliefs of the secular world, and other faiths, while acknowledging whatever is good,
true and beautiful
in other faith
systems.
No. 2 Concerning the recent legislation
in Parliament between two
belief systems both claiming to be rational, both attempting to convince others, but both can not be
true
«And there is salvation
in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men [Jesus] by which we must be saved» — Acts Crossan is saying he's willing to give up any
belief system that declares itself to be
true?
Religion is more than just a set of «rules» or a
system of worship, among other things, it is also includes the
belief that anything comes
in between worshiping the
true God and an individual is an idol.
In what follows, since we can not consider all these things at once, we shall make our keynote the need to impart to the people a
true and vital
system of Christian
belief.
This statistic rings
true for all
belief systems, because having this integral part of our identity
in common is like strings that hold two people together.
For the sake of convenience and accuracy I did look the verses up, however, they did come from your bible,
in your opinion are they a
true representation of your
belief system?
Atheists overstate the case when they accuse organized religion of all or the bulk of humanity's
true mass evils, but organized religion forms a natural class with other fanatical
belief systems that demand unwavering faith
in absolutes.
In their quest for righteousness, they often become self righteous, using their
belief system as a weapon, to bash over the heads of others, rather than as a tool to improve their own lives and to become a living example of what
true christians should be like or what truly compassionate humans should be like, it's very sad, that so many christians don't have a clue how to act like decent people, and that they are hypocrites and full of hate.
For the religiously orthodox, religious
belief systems were felt to represent «objective» reality as it really is, and thus if one of them is
true the others must be false, either absolutely or
in some degree.
You accept ONLY haysoos as the one and only savior as other
belief systems are not the word of the one
true god resulting
in hellfire and damnation.
It is
in no manner offensive to say that to a
true believer of Mormonism, for he / she understands the essentials of their
belief system and how they differ.
The point I intended (aside from demons not being savable, and yes they do believe
in Jesus and know who He is) is that you can not hold two contradictory
belief systems as
true and expect to be save by one of them.
This was not
true in the NCB subculture that I escaped from, hardly anyone was religious at all, though I do not doubt that people with these
belief systems exist.
If your
belief system includes lots of negative, anti-love thoughts, then love isn't going to last long
in your orbit (I'm sorry, but it's
true).
Collaborative Law is worth considering if some or all of the following are
true for you: (a) you want a civilized, rational resolution of the issues, (b) you would like to keep open the possibility of a viable working relationship with your partner down the road, (c) you and your partner will be raising children together and you want the best working relationship possible, (d) you want to protect your children from the harm associated with litigation between parents, (e) you have ethical or spiritual
beliefs that place high value on taking personal responsibility for handling conflicts with integrity, (f) you value control and autonomous decision making and do not want to hand over decisions about restructuring your financial and parenting arrangements to a stranger (a judge), (g) you recognize the restricted and often unpredictable range of outcomes and «rough justice» generally available
in the public court
system and want a more creative and individualized range of choices available to you and your spouse or partner for resolving the issues.