Sentences with phrase «true low point»

It was a dangerous time to learn the ropes and I only put money in slowly, with no expectation of «timing» the market's true low point.

The movie reaches its true low point during a football game which just goes on and on, as if the Wayans had no idea what to do next.

Not exact matches

True, the Dow gained over 100 points, but new lows outpaced new highs by nearly 10 - to - 1, the Nasdaq fell, and utilities sunk to a new low.

Nguyen delivered a compelling point that Bitcoin Cash is the true Bitcoin — fast, easy, has lower transaction fees and stays true to the vision of Satoshi Nakamoto of a peer - to - peer electronic cash system.

«This dramatically lowers the true cost of ownership to the point where almost anyone could own a Tesla.»

If man has evolved out of lower forms of life, at what point did he become man, and what is it that constituted true humanity?

-- You are a true believer in the fact that a dream life and dream job is achievable for anyone, even those at their lowest point.

It's important because we want the low - calorie attribute to stay true to the point of consumption.

Sad but true... Manchester derby a pretty pathetic affair... low quality on both sides... then again we are a mere five points ahead of them which says a lot about our season....

It's helped throw their expected record and run differential out of line — you can't just erase those blowouts, of course, but the team's true talent is likely a lot closer to what they look like in the rest of their games instead of just Matt Cain's and Jake Peavy's low points.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Former NCB True Believer, if the claim in question is «breastfeeding lowers the rate of allergies,» then the data points sleuther and I presentd aren't particularly relevant.

(Even moms with true low milk supply often are able to reach a point of acceptance with whatever supplementation is necessary, and are able to find peace with the amount of breastmilk they are able to offer.)

Midwives who brag about having lower C - section rates as «proof» that natural birth is better and midwifery care superior have totally missed the point and should NOT call that «evidence based care» (I could brag that I haven't had one patient I have performed a AAA repair on and it would be true, only it's because I can't perform one, not that I haven't cared for a patient who needs one).

I don't put much store in opinion polls, but if true it would only indicate roughly what you would expect to happen at this point in the parliament - 32 % isn't that much lower than Labour got in the 2005 General Election and all it would suggest is that the Liberal Democrats are having a reversal - tactical voting could see them holding onto many of their current seats, indeed it is even possible that if they got 17 % of the vote that if it focused in an area that they could actually end up with more seats, where the switches in support are occuring is crucial - if they are focused then if the Conservative Party were to get 39 % then it might still result in them getting fewer seats than Labour or in extremis winning a 150 seat majority or so?

But more importantly this old study (by mitochondrial membrande phospholipid fatty acids composition remodeling towards a low perodizable index PI and double bond unsaturation index DBI by genetically reduced desaturase (essentially switching perodizable polyunsaturates with monounsaturates / saturates, rendering membranes lipid peroxidation resistant / blocking hydroperoxide formation by DHA n - 3 and lowering mitochondrial DNA lesions formation by membrane lipid peroxidation chain propagation), It's true though that these effects are due to transcriptional lipid genes regulation (so the genes are the reason of this dramatic effect and this is also a gene therapy, that hit the key points) this old study showed

This makes sense as low triglycerides and high HDL is typically associated with better metabolic health, and although the data is not definitive by any means it does raise some interesting questions about whether the same holds true for people with very high HDL, very low triglycerides, and LDL far above the cutoff point they listed (AKA Lean Mass Hyper Responders).

It seems that once the word «Anti-Oxidants» has been used then a fixation and focus develops, imagining that if the sample you want to test contains mainly substances that you do not consider «Anti-Oxidants» then there's no point Mythbuster # 1 While it is true that some substances do give lower readings like some medicinal mushrooms -LSB-...]

With just a little research, for people with true problems with gluten, this is nothing more than a fad low carb diet that is latching onto wheat as the boogy man selling point.

I don't think there's any question that one can keep weight off long term with a low calorie diet and this is especially true for naturally lean people who just ate too much for a while, however the point is what works for most people with the highest corresponding quality of life

If the MAF HR (as per the 180 - formula) corresponds to the point of burning 50 % fats and 50 % carbs, could a very high carb, low fat diet cause the «true MAF HR» to be even lower?

BENEFITS • Provides true color (color in package is the same as on eyelid) • Stays color true (color does not change hue / color as it wears) • Fuss proof / fail proof • Doesn't pull or tug on eyelids • Defines eye with perfect precision • Creamy smooth glide - on - color • Acceptable for use as a kohl liner • Retractable • Long wearing • Self - sharpening • Available in Majestic Plum, Blackened Green, Blackest Black, Saturn Grey, Starry Night, Cosmic Brown, Classic Emerald • Clinically tested • Smooth, creamy finish TO USE • Swivel point up to desired length (no more than 1/4 inch), and draw a fine line along upper and lower lash lines, as close to the lashes as possible

There are several true low - points, but the overall effect of the ninety - odd minutes is one constant low, and the truly abysmal moments fail to stand out from the background.

Differentiation: purple = lower ability blue = middle ability yellow = higher ability Resources prepare students for answering Q1 and Q2 and cover the following: - introduction to paper 2 - expectations and timings - identifying key information in 19th century and modern texts - identifying the point of view of a writer - inferring - exploring how language creates tone - complete true or false tasks (as per the exam) for the texts read - explore the term synthesis - synthesise information from 2 texts - work in pairs and groups - explore model answers - investigate these of connectives to synthesise - self and peer assess - develop vocabulary and analyse vocabulary in texts using inference - explore audience and purpose Regular assessments are included to assess students ability in true or false and synthesis tasks.

Differentiation: purple = lower ability blue = middle ability yellow = higher ability Resources prepare students for answering Q1 and Q2 and cover the following: - structure strip to help form better responses to question 2 (synthesis)- introduction to paper 2 - expectations and timings - identifying key information in 19th century and modern texts - identifying the point of view of a writer - inferring - exploring how language creates tone - complete true or false tasks (as per the exam) for the texts read - explore the term synthesis - synthesise information from 2 texts - work in pairs and groups - explore model answers - investigate these of connectives to synthesise - self and peer assess - develop vocabulary and analyse vocabulary in texts using inference - explore audience and purpose Regular assessments are included to assess students ability in true or false and synthesis tasks.

The same is true when courses in the same subject are offered at different levels; lower - level courses can place artificial limits on the points some individuals can attain in their learning.

It is true, as Smith points out, that a 2013 Stanford CREDO study finds that low - income students in high - poverty charter schools do somewhat better than low - income students in high - poverty district schools.

However, as the Houston Chronicle's Rick Casey points out, the proficiency standards were already low to begin with and, citing the recently released EdNext article by Paul Peterson and Carlos Lastra - Anadón, Casey notes that this has been true now for some time.

While all have been relegated to a point 30 to 40 percent lower than previously, the exact curve is absolutely connected to socioeconomic status — which has been historically true in such testing for more than a century.

The report, of course, assumes that giving out A's at these rates shows standards in these classes are low — which, as we also pointed out last month, isn't necessarily true.

Its low price point and a plethora of features make it a value - oriented model with few true competitors.

A last note: some authors worry that a low price point will cheapen the reputation of their book, particularly in paper sales, but to a certain extent the opposite is true.

This is getting down to the price point of a low - end iPod Touch or mid-range cellphone so if true, it will get interesting.

But the same can't be said for the current crop of lower - priced 7 - inch Android tablets like the $ 199 Nexus 7, a price point that is essentially impossible for Windows RT OEMs to hit if rumors of an $ 85 licensing charge for Microsoft's OS are true.

In a lower return environment, the true tax deferral benefit of extending the average holding period of an investment from 2 years to 5 years — chopping the portfolio turnover rate from 50 % down to 20 % — is actually less than 5 basis points, which can be made up in the blink of an eye through a lower cost investment change or a mere day's worth of relative returns (not to mention weeks, months, or years)!»

It's almost to the point of being a joke actually, because just when you think the mortgage refinance companies can't lower the rates any further, you will inevitably spot a T.V. commercial or billboard with an insanely low re-fi rate that sounds too good to be true.

Once you achieve desired credit points it becomes possible to get high loan amounts for low - interest rates to make your dreams come true.

True, every 20 points in your score can mean a slightly lower mortgage rate or better car loan, but only up to the mid-700s.

Point 4 — This is true but it could go lower because there is no one that wants to buy and hold at present.

The highlights this year pointed out one of the true benefits of the TSP; the low expense ratio that we pay compared to other -LSB-...]

The applicant's true score might be 100 or 150 points lower, revealing him to be a serious credit risk.

Investors clearly understand that higher fees can have a negative impact on their net return, as is evident in the price war in mutual fund fees, but a few basis - points difference in visible fees is far less meaningful in performance impact than the often - large hidden costs.14 For example, switching from a low - turnover strategy to a sloppily constructed strategy that spends scores of basis points in incremental trading costs can cost the investor dearly in performance.15 The same holds true for the buyers of opaque high - fee products (hedge funds and illiquid private investments), for which substantial costs may be hidden from sight.

This dreamy destination might well be directly below the famous and bustling Single Fin bar and the main access point to the world - renowned Uluwatu surf break, but come low tide, this spot at Suluban Beach is a true hidden treasure, and the best for a secret swim.

It may not be as long as the other Uncharted adventures, but it's low price point and excellent graphics ensure that you will be in a true cinematic experience.

True, it also shows transitions between upper and lower bounds, but you might be correct that I really hesitate to call them «tipping points».

But the evidence shows this can't be true; temperature changes before CO2 in every record of any duration for any time period; CO2 variability does not correlate with temperature at any point in the last 600 million years; atmospheric CO2 levels are currently at the lowest level in that period; in the 20th century most warming occurred before 1940 when human production of CO2 was very small; human production of CO2 increased the most after 1940 but global temperatures declined to 1985; from 2000 global temperatures declined while CO2 levels increased; and any reduction in CO2 threatens plant life, oxygen production, and therefore all life on the planet.

Part of our research does suggest that the accumulative impact of greenhouse gas output on future world temperatures may be lower than the IPCC estimates — which is good news if true — but the point is to tackle the problem in a variety of different ways.»

While it is true that this index has risen from a low point around 1970, it is also clear that it merely returned to values observed in the early 20th century.

Finally, the point about panels efficiency being low is only partially true..

This dramatically lowers the true cost of ownership to the point where almost anyone could own a Tesla.