Sentences with phrase «true meaning of the law»

Not exact matches

Vladeck, now a professor at Georgetown Law, said violations of the consent decree could carry a penalty of $ 40,000 per violation, meaning that if news reports that the data of 50 million people were shared proves true, the company's possible exposure runs into the trillions of dollars.

Wail away all you like, about the const - itution and how it is being mis - read, the true meaning of the separation of / from church and state, but it all does not matter — the law as currently interpreted and enforced says events of this nature are not legal!

@Howard — As a republic, which is a version of representative democracy, it means we do not have a true or direct democracy where each law would be voted on by each citizen, but an elected representative for larger groups of people that gets to cast the vote, which may or may not at times represent the will of the voters who elected the representative.

Thérèse Souga from Cameroon says that «Christ is the true human, the one who makes it possible for all persons to reach fulfillment and to overcome the historic alienations weighing them down... The realism of the cross every day tells me, as a woman of the Third World, that the laws of history can be overcome by means of crucified love.»

Being an atheist allows me to think for my self and get a true understanding of life that makes sense to me, I do not have to follow a existential bunch of laws that may or may not be what they were truly meant to be.

there's really no room for the concept of an independent entity possessed of «will» in a worldview shaped by cause and effect; the only place for «will» to retreat to is the zone of true randomness, of complete uncertainty, which means that truly free will as such must be completely inscrutible [sic]... Statistical laws govern the decay of a block of uranium, but whether or not this atom of uranium chooses to fission in this instant is a completely unpredictable event — fundamentally unpredictable, something which simply can not be known — which is equally good evidence for the proposition that it's God's (or the atom's) will whether it splits or remains whole, as for the proposition that it's random chance.

By the same stroke, the philosophy of the will takes on its true meaning: it is not exhausted in the relation between the maxim and the law, between the arbitrary and the willed; a third dimension appears: arbitrary — law — aim of totality.

Yet notice that Jesus tells them over and over in the Gospels that even though they are Bible experts, they know nothing about God, loving others, obeying the law, or the true meaning of the Scriptures themselves.

You speak on what is «True Doctrine», could we also point to something such as the Consti; tution and the daily court room arguments of lawyers and clerks who feel that they alone know and understand the true meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the laws of this lTrue Doctrine», could we also point to something such as the Consti; tution and the daily court room arguments of lawyers and clerks who feel that they alone know and understand the true meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the laws of this ltrue meaning of the what the framers when they wrote the laws of this land?

True, freedom, in the New Testament sense of the word, means facultas standi extra se coram deo, freedom from condemnation, freedom from the bondage of the law, etc..

It is an absurd, but nonetheless real, challenge to defend the idea that «true» and «false» exist, that «right» and «wrong» have meaning, that the contours of the natural world have significance, and order, and law.

If you mean that we counter creationists arguments that evolution runs counter to the second law of thermodynamics by saying that that law only applies to heat transfer and randomness in a closed (gaseous) system, well, that is true.

If it is true that, bound by the collective interaction of its liberties, the human social group can not escape from certain irreversible laws of evolution, does this mean that, observed along its axis of «greatest complexity» (i.e. increasing liberty) the World is coiling upon itself with as much sureness as it is in other respects radiating outwards and explosively expanding?

Culture has many complicated meanings, but I use it here simply to describe a system of beliefs (about God or reality or ultimate meaning), of values (about what is true, good and beautiful), of customs (about how to behave and relate to others), and of the institutions which express the culture (government, church, law courts, family, school and so on)-- all of which bind the society together and give it meaning.

At least I find that the fear of same has contributed in controlling people from ab - using each other on the streets sw - earing calling names at each others beliefs, meaning that even if Jesus was s - worn at or called names at by a Muslim or non Muslim this will surely end up with the same faith of this woman since Jesus is as well Prophet and Messanger of God Allah and calling him names is just as equal guilt and that is the true law to be respected.

For all of those who are saying that Christianity promotes slavery in any way, I encourage you to step away from the book of Leviticus (or any book in the OT that talks about laws outside of the 10 commandments) and instead, go read the book of Romans... you'll learn a lot more about the true meaning the of the Bible there.

Jeremy a great job of blowing the dust off these passages and revealing their true meaning, which is often hidden by those with an agenda of trying to make believers fear that they will loose eternity with Christ if they don't try harders through works or their obedience to following the law.

This statement is meant as a law of nature: It purports to be true in every case there ever could be.

In fact, without this a priori framework it would be possible to see from the text that for Paul the knowledge of God through creation is a redemptive knowledge, since, if the loss of this knowledge and the failure to accept the law written in the heart result in a loss of grace and condemnation (Rom 1:18; 2:14 - 16), then the converse must be true, namely, that the possession of this knowledge means the possession of grace and therefore salvation.

This enhanced growth of the strength of gravity means that the true energy scale at which the laws of gravity and quantum mechanics clash — and black holes can be made — could be much lower than the traditional expectation.

Now that has changed completely the nature of, if that's really true, it means the future of science is very different, because if there are many universes and in each universe the laws of physics are different, then may be we have to throw out fundamental ideas and the ability to make fundamental predictions in nature [and] have to start talking about probability.

Mathematics, theology, philosophy and law are examples of fields that revolve within a stand - alone world in which new findings are derived by means of logical operations consisting of axioms, postulates or articles of faith (theology) that need not be proven true or accurate through empirical studies or analyses.

This means that when this law goes into effect in July, PeTA's Virginia facility will have to become a true shelter that actually houses and adopts out animals or get out of the shelter — and euthanasia — «business» entirely.

(This is true but provides the agency only a fairly thin semantic argument that focuses on reading the law but not any comprehension of its meaning.)

A lot of smart people even today argue things violate the Second Law when clearly they are true and observable, and the science to explain their confusion has existed for years, as had Planck's own work done for years before he understood what he meant.

It is my own position, except that the «strength» of the isothermal argument is so much greater than that of a temperature lapse — given that it straight up violates the second law of thermodynamics — that the default position of any real scientist should be roughly the same as it is whenever somebody proposes a perpetual motion machine, or that they can negate gravity by means of a simple electronic device they built in their basement, or have worked out the One True Theory of Everything in their spare time, in spite of the fact that they never actually took calculus or physics in college (or may not have attended college).

Still, Amtrak has its fans, and this writer is certainly of the opinion that increased ridership would mean better cities, cleaner air and, if the laws of economics hold true, increased funding.

Where access to capital is constrained as is true in the practice of law, labour is overwhelmingly the means of production.

With profit margins continuously getting smaller, working without knowing the true cost (and the relative price) of the legal services provided means risking the closure of a law firm.

If that is true, what does that mean for the future of law?

Similar to Canadian law, under Australian law, the defence of justification is made out when a defendant proves that the defamatory meanings of the publications are substantially true.

I hope to bring together that special group of lawyers in the Self - Rep Navigators: lawyers who understand the true purpose of law, who recognize that providing unbundled services is the means to the ultimate goal of access to justice.

And in law the liberation of nations» statutes and rulings from the pay - prison offers at least the prospect of giving true meaning to fiction of promulgation.

It may be that you mean that 1 / 3rd of graduates are non-white, which would be totally believable given that — as I pointed out in my earlier comment — the same is true of law school graduates.

Also the fact that you have never heard of someone claiming that law firms are under - capitalized does not mean it is not true.

Furthermore, although it is true that the procedure laid down in Article 267 TFEU is an instrument for cooperation between the Court of Justice and the national courts, by means of which the former provides the latter with the points of interpretation of EU law necessary in order for them to decide the disputes before them, the fact remains that when there is no judicial remedy under national law against the decision of a court or tribunal of a Member State, that court or tribunal is, in principle, obliged to bring the matter before the Court of Justice under the third paragraph of Article 267 TFEU where a question relating to the interpretation of EU law is raised before it...

It is true that the Claimants failed to disclose that treaty law was part of the law of the DIFC and sought an order on the basis that the Convention was permissive and did not provide an exclusive means of service.

I would argue that decision - makers and stakeholders of law firms are simply better off if their firm adopts a strategy for long - term viability.2 Assuming that this is true, however, doesn't mean that individuals make decisions that bear this out.

And this is what I understand to be the meaning of our lawyers, when they say that these civil corporations are liable to no visitation; that is, that the law having by immemorial usage appointed them to be visited and inspected by the king their founder, in his majesty's court of king's bench, according to the rules of the common law, they ought not to be visited elsewhere, or by any other authority.53 And this is so strictly true, that though the king by his letters patent had subjected the college of physicians to the visitation of four very respectable persons, the lord chancellor, the two chief justices, and the chief baron; though the college had accepted this carter with all possible marks of acquiescence, and had acted under it for near a century; yet, in 1753, the authority of this provision coming in dispute, on an appeal preferred to these supposed visitors, they directed the legality of their own appointment to be argued: and, as this college was a mere civil, and not an eleemosynary foundation, they at length determined, upon several days solemn debate, that they had no jurisdiction as visitors; and remitted the appellant (if aggrieved) to his regular remedy in his majesty's court of king's bench.

Vladeck, now a professor at Georgetown Law, said violations of the consent decree could carry a penalty of $ 40,000 per violation, meaning that if news reports that the data of 50 million people were shared proves true, the company's possible exposure runs into the trillions of dollars.