Moreover, it is
true the models predicting the post-Pinatubo temperature drop were run before the temperature dropped.
Not exact matches
The amplification in Steinhauer's
model allows him to detect only one frequency of the radiation, so he can not be sure it has Hawking's
predicted intensity at different frequencies that
true Hawking radiation would have.
Scientists have developed numerous
models to
predict how much fuel remains inside Earth to drive its engines — and estimates vary widely — but the
true amount remains unknown.
This
model predicts that there should be many more small galaxies than large galaxies — that is observed to be
true.
While it's
true that we can not
predict the world our students will graduate into, we were able to
model our classroom on the way small, successful startups operate in the business community.
If this were
true though, we would see a hotspot about 12 km above the equator — as the «climate
models»
predict, no such hotspot has materialised though, which essentially invalidates the theory.
There will undoubtedly also be a number of claims made that aren't
true; 2008 is not the coolest year this decade (that was 2000), global warming hasn't «stopped», CO2 continues to be a greenhouse gas, and such variability is indeed
predicted by climate
models.
That is certainly
true now, because we are using weather
models to try to
predict climate.
Lucia says: «The one thing that is
true: The
models predict up.
The one thing that is
true: The
models predict up.
It's
true that some climate
models predict that Antarctic sea ice should be decreasing, but as Polvani and Smith (2013) shows, the natural variability in Antarctic sea ice extent is probably larger than any trend from the forced response in
models anyway.
The
true test of climate
models, hence of the CO2 hypothesis, will be in how well they
predict data not yet seen.
It is
true that «climate change» is often preferred to «global warming» but this is to better reflect to disparity in regional responses not to say
models no longer
predict global warming.
While it is
true that most of the CO2 - caused warming in the atmosphere was there before humans ever started burning coal and driving SUVs, this is all taken into account by computerized climate
models that
predict global warming...
The observation are
true even though they were not
predicted by most climate
models.
«It is undeniably
true that global temperature increases have been far, far less than doomsday computer
models predicted — about three times smaller, and there are good reasons to suspect the increases from further human CO2 emissions would be smaller still, without imposing draconian regulations.
There is more Antarctic ice than ever there was (NOT
TRUE: RESEARCHERS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL REPORTED THIS YEAR THAT OVERALL ICE LOSS IN ANTARCTICA HAS INCREASED ABOUT 75 PER CENT OVER THE 10 YEAR PERIOD FROM 1996 - 2006 AND THAT
MODELS PREDICTING AN INCREASE IN ICE MASS ARE NOT BEARING OUT: IT»S DECLINING EVERYWHERE.)
«Stakeholders who are convinced that future anthropogenic warming will be slower than current
models predict will be reassured that the policy will «bite» correspondingly more slowly,» the researchers write, «while the converse is also
true for those concerned about unexpectedly rapid warming in the future.»
An unintended consequence of this strategy is that there has been very little left over for
true climate
modeling innovations and fundamental research into climate dynamics and theory — such research would not only support amelioration of deficiencies and failures in the current climate
modeling systems, but would also lay the foundations for disruptive advances in our understanding of the climate system and our ability to
predict emergent phenomena such as abrupt climate change.
«Whatever the
true cause or causes, one thing is certain, all of the climate
models have failed to
predict the observed increase in Southern Hemisphere sea ice extent.
And
true,
models predict greater T rise (if not greater max T) at the poles than at the tropics, and supposedly this is happening, even if not at Baffin Island, where (again) unprecedented melting is supposedly occuring without T rise or amplification.
We conclude that the ice sheet surface is efficiently drained under optimal conditions, that digital elevation
models alone can not fully describe supraglacial drainage and its connection to subglacial systems, and that
predicting outflow from climate
models alone, without recognition of subglacial processes, may overestimate
true meltwater release from the ice sheet.
Climate
models predict measurable outcomes: if their prediction is false then they're a scientific theory, if their prediction comes
true what's the complaint?
But despite all these theoretical
models, Pearson said the clues about what
predicts true compatibility are much more of a felt sense than something you reason out.
Lack of sexual satisfaction was much less common (8.7 %) in this sample, and the ability of the
model to
predict cases (
true positives) was very low, though the ability to
predict controls (
true negatives) was very high.
At that level REIT total returns over the next 12 months were
predicted to be negative and to underperform the broad stock market — and both predictions were
true, although the
model failed to
predict the severity of the downturn with REIT returns of -23 percent underperforming the stock market by 20 percentage points during those 12 months.