Not exact matches
And I believe understanding this element
of human nature — which I'll discuss in the next section —
is key to building a life that: a) involves ambitious striving toward goals and having impact in the world, which contributes to a sense
of meaning, and b) gives you a shot at realizing
true happiness by avoiding a soul - sucking competitive rat race.
But it
's also
true within the larger context
of human reality that we recognize the gracious
nature of such relationships, and can
be thankful that we have the ability and freedom to give and receive.
Humans are evil in
nature but some choose the path to peace and forgivness which
is the core
of true evangelical Christianity.
When talking about the identity
of Jesus as God (before sin and the Cross) it
is important to have a much bigger emphasis on the fact
of the
true human nature of Christ.
But it
is also a
human word: the
human beings who wrote it
were also
true authors.8 The scriptures therefore share to some extent in the
nature of the incarnation: they use
human things as the means for God to communicate with us humanly.
God in His will through history had into reality seemingly illogical or cruel events to happen in our world, but no one
is spared if the purpose
is for the good
of humanity, wars pestilence even the holocust has a reason and purpose beyond our comprehension at our times but will
be reveald in the future, The Phillipine catasthrophy for example
is viewed by some as Gods punishment, we experienced the brunt
of natures punishing power but it also unveiled the
true feelings and concern
of the whole world in helping us materially and spiiritually by aiding and consoling us that
was unprecedented in history, The whole world had demostrated, to me, a kind
of humanitarian concern and love that trancends races and culture, A kind
of demonstration by higher
being the we
humans is one with Him.The cost
of human lives and misery
is nothing in history compared to its positve historical consequences
If it
is true, as Holloway argues, that the very foundations
of matter and the identity
of human nature are aligned upon the coming
of the Word made flesh, then a society which
is uncertain about the existence
of God and whether Man has any meaning or purpose must
be subject to crisis, alienation and chaos even more inevitably than CiV
is able to show.
It
is certainly
true, as he points out, that any strong separation
of the
human and the natural
is false to the facts, as
nature comes mixed with
human interaction, and
humans are inextricably biological in any case.
Calvin asked whether
human beings have a natural knowledge
of God (his answer
was yes); whether they can arrange what they know from
nature into an intelligible pattern known as natural theology (his answer
was no); and whether redeemed — and only redeemed —
human beings can construct a legitimate theology
of nature by reclaiming
nature as a useful source
of the
true knowledge
of God (his answer
was yes).
It
is not enough to receive it as the occasion
of an encounter with God (although it
is) or as an invitation to join up with God's plan for
human liberation (also
true) or a host
of other redefinitions
of the
nature of biblical authority.
Amid our self - structuring dependent origination, which in Zen
is the very
nature of the
true self, we ought to respect as much as possible the capacities
of others, both nonhuman and
human, to originate dependently in their own self - structuring ways.
There can not
be true peace if everyone
is his own criterion, if everyone can always claim exclusively his own rights, without at the same time caring for the good
of others,
of everyone, on the basis
of the
nature that unites every
human being on this earth.»
After all, how could it
be that something so vanishingly small and insignificant as a
human could «know» the
true nature of god, especially the god you believe in.
The reaction
of nature is a blindingly flashing red - light that man's actions
are unnatural; that he need
be true to his inner demands, which acted upon automatically set a proper balance within
human consciousness and adjust the physical conditions in the entire creation around him.
It
is generally believed that the laws, customs, and rituals by which the particular system
is defined
are written into the
nature of things, and that the social structure
is but a
true reflection
of the innate qualities
of human nature in its several kinds.
Suffice it to say that it reached its culmination, so far as scriptural witness
is concerned, in the affirmation that in Christ the Word (the self - expressive creative Activity which
is divine in
nature) «became flesh and dwelt among us,» while in formal theological statement the climax
was the declaration that in him there
is a genuine union
of divine Activity («
true God») and
human activity like our own («
true human being»).
«We
are deceivers, yet
true in clinging to the idea
of the fall as a symbol
of the origin and the
nature of evil in
human life.»
Only if it can
be shown that
human values exemplify a basically different structure from that defined by the primordial
nature of God
is it
true that Whitehead's God
is irreconcilable with
human goodness.
It will
be far wiser and
truer to the
nature of man to allow the essentials
of the content
of faith to «sink in» so that
human culture itself becomes imbued with the truth
of Revelation.
Always central to his writing
is a fully orthodox defence
of the literal divinity
of the Person
of Jesus Christ and also
of his
true human nature as Son
of Man.
Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view
of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals
are concerned... and there
is NO way to ascertain which
is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never
be proven objectively, since Spirit, by it
's very
nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to
be happening on this earth, because Spirit
is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked
human eye,
being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.
As examples
of the former: if what most Christians think about Jesus
of Nazareth
is true, then what most Muslims think about him must
be false; if what most Buddhists think about the
nature of human persons
is true, then what most Jews think about this must
be false... and so on.
The significance
of Christ as the second Adam
is the revelation
of the
true character
of both the
human and the divine
nature.
In the unceasing
human striving from the good to the better, in the contempt
of the base and mean, in the universal homage to the
true and noble and unselfish, there
was, for Israel's thought, just as for ours, a profound mystery that compelled speculation to venture beyond the immediate and tangible, out into the region
of cause and
nature and
being.
A critical reader may suspect that this idea grew out
of later reflection and served an apologetic interest; yet it
is true to
human nature and experience.
We have seen that Paul's understanding
of the realities
of the
human situation apart from Christ could
be expressed only in mythological terms, and the suggestion has
been made that, in the
nature of the case, this must
be true, not for him only, but also for us, if our understanding
is at all adequate or profound.
Its power should not
be underestimated:
natures fresh to sexuality can have a purer sense
of the mystery
of the body and a spontaneous understanding
of the
true relationship ofbodily actions to
human love.
As Leo the Great says: «
True God, then, was born in the complete and perfect nature of true man, completely human and completely div
True God, then,
was born in the complete and perfect
nature of true man, completely human and completely div
true man, completely
human and completely divine.
Humboldt states in his monograph on the dual that, though the study
of language should
be pursued for its own sake, it «resembles other branches
of learning in not having its ultimate purpose in itself but that it conforms to the general purpose
of interest in the
human mind to help humanity to realize its
true nature and its relation to everything visible and invisible around and above itself.»
Niebuhr goes on to add that the fact that the will to power inevitably justifies itself in terms
of the morally more acceptable will to realize our
true nature means that the egoistic corruption
of universal ideals
is a much more persistent fact in
human affairs than any moralistic creed
is inclined to admit.
Some small pieces
of it, it
is true, may
be painful, or may show
human nature in a pathetic light, but it will
be mainly pleasant, because the best fruits
of religious experience
are the best things that history has to show.
This
is the idea that as
human history progressed, God revealed more and more
of Himself to humanity, so that the later portions
of Scripture more accurately reveal the
true nature of God than the earlier portions (see chapters 2, 11).
WORLD:
Humans have tried to understand the
true Nature of things forever and how they control us and how we should act to
be properly in communion with them... and those concepts have
been updated continually by those in tune or desiring to better understand such concepts, that
were once explained by God in
human form.
These four — divine dependence, mutual obligation stemming from love, sound judgment
of human nature, and the practice
of brotherhood in daily experience —
are the basis
of any
true democracy.
The idea that the aim
of human evolution
is the unfolding
of the
human being, the creation
of «wealthy»
human being who has overcome the contradiction between self and
nature and achieved
true freedom,
is expressed in many passages
of Capital, written by the mature and old Marx.
Conjugal acts must
be open to the transmission
of human life; marriage and the family must
be defended «from every possiblemisrepresentation
of their
true nature» (i.e.civil partnerships)...».
«It
is clear that the strengthening and maturing
of faith which we seek requires a deepening appreciation
of the role
of faith in completing and fulfilling our
human nature and in particular its harmony with
true reasoning.
This
is true biologically; and therefore, given the harmony
of human nature, also psychologically.
As Orthodox theologian Vladimir Lossky observes, the Eastern Church regards choice as the mark not
of freedom but
of fallenness, as a debasement
of true liberty, as a loss
of the divine likeness: «Our
nature being overclouded with sin no longer knows its
true good... and so the
human person
is always faced with the necessity
of choice; it goes forward gropingly.»
much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack
of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get
true market value for most
of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out
of us when we
are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club
is respect, a word that appears to
be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this
is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that
's just
human nature, it
's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..
Dominic CavendishTheatre critic and adaptor
of Orwell: A Celebration1984 grabs us by the throat in early adolescence or adulthood and never lets go because it tells us something deeply unpleasant about
human nature; something we know at once, however safe and secure we
are, to
be true.
SO, there
is a
true humor and view into
human nature when one
of the most notorious periods in New York City government, then led by Mayor Koch,
is apparently discounted and finds our former Mayor now advocating for some type
of improvement in the conduct
of the State Legislature.
Amid a freewheeling discussion
of genes and
human nature with Charlotte Hunt - Grubbe, a former lab assistant
of his, Watson chanced to comment that it would certainly
be nice if the world's different racial groups had all evolved to
be equally intelligent, but that «people who have to deal with black employees find this not
true.»
In fact, it
is so important that among mammals and birds the norm
is for a species to have a third eyelid and those lacking one — such as
humans and some
of our fellow primates —
are the
true oddities in
nature.
He taught us that our vanity had blinded us to the
true nature of minds, animal and
human; that so much more
is to
be learned about animal minds than received doctrine allowed.
It
is certainly
true that a drastic cut in the
human population could benefit the rest
of nature, but Perry...
If the pessimistic view
of human nature is true, people should
be more averse to shocking themselves — and so
be willing to make less money — as compared with shocking others.
Somehow revealing to my
true self and our
nature of being human.
Based on a
true story, it begins with the self - serving
nature of human beings and evolves into their better angels.
Once the
true task
is revealed and at hand, the movie stays fairly close to Lewis» moralizing center, as each
of the central characters finds him and herself tempted by the whims
of human nature, mainly greed.