Not exact matches
Maybe it would be better to say that I think
science is a more accurate (as opposed to «
true») way of trying to understand what
objective reality actually is?
True,
objective science like the observations outlined by Charles Darwin describe aspects of Nature that simply MUST BE.
But the purposes, goals, uses and meanings got left outside the concept of scientific explanation — in the mind, in the church, in the domain of ethics, relative and subjective, while
science was said to be
objective, positivistically
true.
What we learn through
SCIENCE seems more rigorous and more
true, grounded as it is in an
objective method.
1) It is not a
true cosmology at all a) REAL
science is
objective b) an atheist will never consider a theory that includes God, therefore they are not
objective c) Their every outcome is sure to reflect their bias
Jonathan Renouf, executive producer at BBC
Science, said: «We set out to make a film with three objectives; to say something new about climate change, to stay true to the science, and to attract an audience to what is unquestionably a demanding s
Science, said: «We set out to make a film with three
objectives; to say something new about climate change, to stay
true to the
science, and to attract an audience to what is unquestionably a demanding s
science, and to attract an audience to what is unquestionably a demanding subject.
Nine years later, his name appeared on a list of scientists proposed to the Environmental Protection Agency as arbiters of climate
science for a national debate meant to provide Americans «
true, legitimate, peer - reviewed,
objective, transparent discussion about CO ₂.»
With both a scientific approach to gathering data and a
true poetic sensibility, Finch's installations lie between the
objective investigations of
science and the subjectivity of perception and lived experience, endowing his work with a melancholy that comes from what Finch describes as «the impossible desire to see oneself seeing.»
It is the cult of AGW groupthink space cadets — stories told superfically in the
objective idiom of
science but nor amenable to critical thinking that is the
true hallmatk of
science.
In
true science fashion, a CV is typically seen as an
objective document — a simple list of your qualifications and expertise.