Sentences with phrase «true prices of fuel»

But the NPA said, «The Authority encourages consumers and the media to check on the price board of retail stations to determine the true prices of fuel on the market and not rely on the data from any group of persons who purport to project fuel prices which always turns out to be poor and inaccurate.

Not exact matches

Fuel consumption is high, but the purchase price is comparatively reasonable for a true icon of midcentury design.

Most Toyota Highlander buyers end up with the tried - and - true V6 engine, and it's easy to see why: You get almost the same fuel economy as with the base four - cylinder, along with an extra 85 hp and some of the smoothest acceleration in any crossover at this price.

Interesting features of this model are spacious, comfortable interior, fuel economy, V6 power, up to 8 - passenger seating, true car - like handling, and Available all - wheel drive All prices plus license title tax and document fee.

Strengths of this model include spacious, comfortable interior, fuel economy, V6 power, up to 8 - passenger seating, true car - like handling, and Available all - wheel drive * All prices plus license title tax and document fee.

And with its price coming down and no one expecting the same to hold true for gasoline prices, the Ford Escape Hybrid will continue to be a compelling choice for urbanites conscious of their fossil - fuel footprints.

True it's priced higher, but it's the least - expensive, and most fuel efficient of Toyota's upscale brand and actually pretty unique.

Suffice to say that when you factor in all of the government subsidies and «externalities» (increased health costs from respiratory sickness, environmental degradation, etc; the stuff that we all have to pay for maybe not from our wallets but in our tax returns), the true price of fossil fuels is much, much higher than any individual or company pays.

As the effects, the true costs of our current fossil fuel use will be felt to the greatest extent in the future, it seems reasonable to pay the price for those costs now, not leave the debt for future generations to pay with higher cancer rates and global temperatures.

Meanwhile, IRENA notes that the ongoing subsidising of fossil fuels in many countries, combined with the failure so far for a carbon price to account for the true cost of burning fossil fuels, means «today's markets are distorted».

This is also not true, since the if the tax is returned to the public as you envision, they will just use it to offset the higher price of fuel.

They have roles they can fill as fuel consumption reduction devices, which given the right circumstances, are economically viable, but they can't scale all the way simply because the price of trying to do so eventually becomes too high, which is also true for nuclear.

True, the talk of the end of industrial culture may not play well with those who see a darker side of Transition Towns, but it seems hard to argue against the fact that our current reliance on fossil fuels to feed and clothe ourselves leaves us incredibly vulnerable to future price shocks and disruption of supply.

See also:: Thousands in Mexico City Protest Rising Food Prices, IRIN: Food Security Africa,:: Averting «Livestock Meltdown»: Biodiversity Key To Global Food Security,:: Agriculture for Development: World Development Report Gets It Half Right,:: Global Warming Could Cause World Crop Collapse,:: The True Price of Oil: Poverty and Death in Nigeria,:: Food Fight: Is Corn Food or Fuel?

Almost every idea that might bring us a better future would be made much easier if the cost of fossil fuel was higher — if there was some kind of a tax on carbon emissions that made the price of coal and oil and gas reflect its true environmental cost.»

Because the price of fossil fuels has never reflected their true cost, either environmental or political.

That's also why it gags politicians: it incorporates the true cost of fossil fuel consumption in prices.

That way, when fuel prices rise to reflect their true costs, the public will have a buffer — in fact, the majority of Americans will earn money from the policy.

Because fossil fuels will not be able to compete when all their true costs are reflected in their price, we will be off them in a couple of decades.

When you account for the effects which are not reflected in the market price of fossil fuels, like air pollution and health impacts, the true cost of coal and other fossil fuels is higher than the cost of most renewable energy technologies.

The same can be true of negative press — the falling price of Bitcoin could be a self - fueling implosion.