Given the devastating power of eminent domain, there must be
a true public purpose before even considering taking someone's private property.
Not exact matches
Taking aim at two - term Democratic Gov. Cuomo, Molinaro, 42, criticized «leaders who squander the
public's trust by putting the personal politics of ambition and greed above government's
true purpose» of serving the people.
«The
true purpose of these payments is unknown, but it does appear not to be a
purpose related to
public office.
Get Rid of Compulsory Schooling In the April 1924 issue of The American Mercury, journalist and satirist H.L. Mencken ginned up a well - constructed piece on the
true purpose of
public education: «The aim... is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality.»
It is
true that schools and colleges sometimes emphasize different
public purposes.
This may well be
true, but it is surprising to see such strong advocacy for the racial integration of schools at a time when the prospects for any
public action — executive, legislative, or judicial — to combine for
purposes of integrating urban and suburban school districts are just about nonexistent.
But the
true nature and
purpose of the IPCC need to be proclaimed to the
public who have been gulled into thinking the nature and
purpose of the IPCC is «science».
In the current context, if someone were to make a copyrighted scientific study available to the
public for the
true and obvious
purpose of engaging in the political debate over climate and energy policy, then I think they'd have a chance of winning in court.
Governments * are doing * nothing that could possibly affect total CO2 emissions,
true, but the
public has already spent over the many years, trillion dollars paying for all kinds of idiotic activity which is ** said ** by corrupt / stupid / evil / greedy / fraudent government policy makers to be done for the
purpose of reducing CO2 emissions.
The
purpose of requiring full,
true and plain disclosure is to make markets more efficient and to protect the
public.
129 In the third place, as regards the argument that the disclosure of documents relating to the ACTA could only have reinforced the
public interest with regard to international relations and avoid controversy arising from the leaked publication of certain proposals, it should be noted that, while it is
true that the
purpose of Regulation No 1049/2001 is to ensure maximum transparency by giving the fullest possible effect to the right of
public access to documents of the European Union (recital 4 of the regulation), it nevertheless provides exceptions to the right of access to protect certain
public or private interests, and in the present case, the
public interest as regards international relations.