In Norway and Spain, for example, people are now questioning whether feelings for animals and the enjoyment of the countryside might not be swamping
true scientific learning.
Not exact matches
However, Barker makes the point that novice researchers will
learn more effectively once they have gotten their feet wet, a philosophy that rings
true for all
scientific disciplines.
I don't know about «
true learning», but in my view, the essential elements of
scientific perspective owe absolutely nothing to either religion or «the Classics», and consist of:
If it is
true that CAGW is merely plausible, which I can not disagree with, then why are all our
learned scientific societies, and I should add our hostess, saying precisely the opposite?
This is the
true essence of
scientific learning.