Sentences with phrase «true side to them»

Not exact matches

While this may be true, there's another side to going into business for yourself: the price you pay.

Instead, a true, collaborative partnership needs to be formed where both sides contribute from the beginning.

We stayed in touch over the years discussing the business side of things and an opportunity arose for me to step into Float Pod as CEO to take over and help push the company forward, allowing Nick to focus on True Rest Franchising.

A pillow made from a new fabric to consistently feel like «the cold side of the pillow» was one such thing that sounded too good to be true.

«It needs to stay true to brand values, and you don't necessarily have to pick sides.»

You would think simple to use for the consumer means less work on the tech build side, but the opposite is true.

It is true that Canada for many years did all it could to be on the side of the angels.

Some buy - side Tesla watchers questioned whether the company could sustain such numbers - if they prove to be true - and also worried about profitability.

The same is true on the sell side, when it may take five trading days for a sell transaction to be conducted.

He has written that while it is true that this technology «could impact farmers» ability to save seed for cultivation the next year» he argues that on the positive side «the same technologies could prevent the unwanted spread of seeds and pollen in the environment.»

That's doubly true if you think consolidation is in the cards, since BHP, with a strong balance sheet, is likely to be on the buying side there.

This is true whether you want to start your own Shopify store, FBA side - hustle, or anything of the sort.

True Wealth Ventures could not agree more with the opportunity to spark more innovation by shaking things up, gender-wise, on both the investor and inventor side of the equation.

It's true that a token buyer could re-sell the token, thereby perhaps deriving a gain — although many ventures, to stay on the safe side of the SEC, have followed the SAFT (Simple Agreement for a Future Token) model of issuance, which forecloses secondary trading until the platform is live.

And, it means tapping into the required research expertise needed to get true unfiltered insights into the emotions and human side of changing buying behaviors.

Getting to open a second set of studio doors is a dream come true, and we can't wait to share the pure barre technique with the West side of the Treasure Valley.»

Shamgar, is your claim that, if the church was under greater persecution, we would all agree about these things because the people holding to one side of each of these debates aren't true believers, and so they would leave under persecution?

You believe this to be true, so if faced with this door, do you open it and walk through, with the expectation that what is on the other side is exactly what you think it is?

I have not spent much time around people who are dying, but when I sat by my Dad's side as he was making his transition, I found everything that Kerry has written to be true.

There can be no true dialogue when each side is relating to a phantom of its own projection, however benevolent that projection might be, rather than to a view of the other side that the other side can truly accept about itself.

NOt all who call themselves prophets are true believers... some are just for the gains... those are persecuted... cause their evil gets them... those who don't separate themselves from God's side and wisdom can not be harm by evil... evil bows to them and allows them to pass by him unharmed... Cause evil can not harm God... it's the law of Nature... only evil can be harmed by evil...

FACTS ARE THINGS THAT CAN BE SHOWN TO BE TRUE; your god along with the billion or so along side him have no proof what so ever.

We've always had a history of true toleration of people on various sides, but when you feel that you're morally right, it's very tempting to tell the other person, «Shut up.

Only the true word of god, the one that became flesh, Jesus, shows us how god really is and how to see and deal with the human / error sides of the bible.

I think that true and deep discipleship is not happening in a church unless the needs of the congregation and the community are being met, and I think that one of the best ways to disciple believers is to get them serving in the community along side each other.

In the graciousness of the book (something often lacking when people engage Emergent, no names but...), in its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to read.

The imitation theory of the truth of art has at least this on its side: in a sense a good story, a true story, is «true to» the structure of human experience.

If you know for a fact that your religion is true, and jihadists know for a fact that theirs is true, and both sides have prayed about it and god confirmed that its true, then how can this be enough for the ignoranus of the world to believe in religion?

But if we decide instead to come along side the community, and be present with them in whatever they are doing, then we will build relationship with them and be a true blessing to the community in the way God wants us to be.

A «true» evangelical candidate would be honest about his positions, open to reasonable ideas from all sides and would definitely care deeply about the oppressed (in our country and around the world).

There will always be two sides when it comes to the supernatural, and both sides can be true.

I offered a criticism of both sides and I guess I have to think act and talk like and angry atheist or a fundamentalist if I am to be considered a true human being.

pointless to try and go down that route, all it leads to is squabbling over what the «True Motives» were and whether they were or werent inline with what the «True Definition» of your side happens to be.

Thus, given Mays's understanding of the relation of the formal and empirical sides of speculative philosophy in Whitehead, if we were to discover that our abstract system was false under the interpretation of «our concrete spatio - temporal scheme» (PW 32/25), we would not conclude that the system was false, rather that we must look elsewhere for an interpretation or a model under which it is true.

Because this is true, can we not then assume that the rejection of the call to love and serve God lies also on both sides of death?

I am on your side... this is what i am talking about — your quickness to anger and jumpiness to get all pumped up... a true peaceful movement is not made up of people of that sort, but relaxed calm people.

Not because I think he is a good Christian, in fact, given his knowledge of Satan's inner thoughts, he is likely to sit on his (Satan's) right hand side (a.k.a. the anti-Christ) but because if he is nominated, President Obama, the only true Christian amongst those running for the office of the Presidency of the United States in 2012, will win in a landslide.

No, we will keep our God and our beliefs for God's word is true and when Christ returns, He will call us out and we will go to His side.

Yes, the true enemy is not flesh and blood... although sometimes, flesh and blood willfully chooses to side with the enemy of God...

I watched President Obama's news conference last night, and he established beyond any question that the truest test of post partisanship is not whether one receives support from the other side, but whether the majority «listens» to what the other side says.

Although on the theoretical side the Muslim philosophers certainly seemed to be anti-Islamic, at least in some of their views, on the practical side they were true Muslims, insofar as we can gather from their biographies.

In these threads that does not seem to hold true at all... The condemnations from both sides are overwhelming.

If both sides (Athiest and Believers) wan na be true, stop bashing each other.

But whoever wants, on the other hand, really to behold and receive all truth, and would have the truth - world overhang him as an empyrean of stars, complex, multitudinous, striving antagonistically, yet comprehended, height above height, and deep under deep, in a boundless score of harmony; what man soever, content with no small rote of logic and catechism, reaches with true hunger after this, and will offer himself to the many - sided forms of the scripture with a perfectly ingenuous and receptive spirit; he shall find his nature flooded with senses, vastnesses, and powers of truth, such as it is even greatness to feel.

This is particularly true of CP's first marriage, of which I acquired an extremely one - sided view from a nephew who lived in the house of the couple at the time when the marriage was about to be ended by the husband.

The same was true when Mary went to offer the purification offering for herself (Side note: though poor, she still sacrificed and obeyed God.

If It were true that all the evil were on one side, then any appeal to fairness might be seen as making a pact with the devil.

The argument is particularly devastating today, for it is addressed precisely to the deprived, to workers, to those who live in underdeveloped countries (who are in even worse case than the besieged in Jerusalem), and it is true enough on its negative side.

Further, no matter what side of the fence you are on, you'd have to be impossibly naïve and brain dead to say it doesn't matter whether your beliefs are actually true or not.

It comes from a particular vocal group of naturalists on one side and a much smaller but equally noisy lot of creationists on the other, both of whom have increasingly been declaring their respective philosophical views not merely to be true but to be true in a specifically scientific sense.