Sentences with phrase «true teachings of the religion»

While I understand your anger, I do not think you understand that it was not the whole of the Catholic Church that committed these crimes, it was men, power hungry men, that actually acted outside of the true teachings of the religion.

Modern - day so - called christians have been good at twisting facts, now they can not even be bold and honest enough to revert to the true teaching of their religion.

Not exact matches

An ever accumulating amount of research is finding that what every religion and moral teaching has said about forgiveness is true.

Disastrous events will continue to happen and even worsen as long as the world calls on the name of «Jesus» and on the names (Yahweh, Jehovah, YHWH, Allah etc) taught by the religions and not on the true name of God in the Bible (that Jesus failed to make known) that was revealed by Teacher Evangelista in http://www.thename.ph

I'm not an atheist, I was raised Catholic and believe in my religion but any Christian who openly professes their faith while condemning others who are of a different faith or of no faith at all, are blaspheming the true teachings of Christ.

They can «study» their religion, but it still comes down to faith in the teachings, and personal experience, neither of which can ever be meaningfully tested true or false in any kind of objective way.

True Religion, the religion of God's Word does not teach that Governments of today are Christian, but instead aligns them with God's adversary Satan.

True, without being «taught» (loose use of the word) you would never come to believe in any of the known religions..

One of my biggest issues with religion is that it teaches people that if you believe something hard enough it must be true even if facts, logic, and evidence say it isn't.

It would not be true to say that Jeremiah first discovered the rôle of the individual in religion; for it is implicit in all prophetic teaching.

[10] «ln our view there is an important difference between this factual information being imparted in a descriptive way as part of a wide - ranging syllabus about different religions, and a curriculum which teaches a particular religion's doctrinal beliefs as if they were objectively true.»

For example, whereas the sun and moon were the objects of worship in pagan religion, the Book of Genesis taught that they were nothing but lamps set in the heavens to give light to day and night: not gods, but mere things, creatures of the one true God.

To the extent that they are careless about their instruction in the faith, or present its teaching falsely, or even fail in their religious, moral, or social life, they must be said to conceal rather than to reveal the true nature of God and of religion.»

A churchly school should not teach religion as if all religions were equally true or false, or appoint a critical mass of its faculty from secularists, and undoubtedly in certain situations a functioning magisterium will say so with force, but such mandates are nevertheless mere preliminaries.

Though both the conception of human liberty and the virtues necessary to its true exercise sprang from biblical teachings, the framers were careful not to endow biblical religion, or any religion, with state power.

I'm profoundly dissatisfied with the notion that mysticism is a kind of true religion, or the hidden core of the true religion, while institutions and teachings occupy some kind of periphery.

You've been taught practically since birth that Christianity is the only true religion, so of course that's what you believe.

Any religion that teaches hate of anything but what God hates such as fornication idolotry or murder is not a true Christian there is only one Christian faith that has never been accused of doing nothing but teach people the bible going door to door but this is why people ridicule them for doing what the bible says they do nt charge for their material they do nt have communions they do nt pay their members for 2 years or send them to a college for doing so they do nt pay the speakers like other churches and they do nt hate anyone based on any reason they only give them bible knowledge then once they know the knowledge its their choice what to do with it.

Just as the attitude of the Sufis toward the religious teachings of Islam was a revolt against the jurists who stifled the true spirit of religion in order to preserve its form, their attitude toward God was also a revolt directed against the theologians and the philosophers.

Sunism and Shia ism are cults, denial of truth absolute GAWD, based not on true teachings of Mullahs, but muslim ism corruption of true teachings, based on Mithra ism, criminal savior ism, to justify Suni criminal King's or Amir's, another word for a self centered Shia sanatan, filthy goon to be free of La, truth, ism's, not truth, wahabism, corruption of truth absolute, labeled as religion's.

i expect that for the majority of the population religion is little more than a footnote and held to be true simply because it is what they have been taught and their daily lives never bring a reason to challenge the belief.

Maybe if Christian churches quit peddling their right - wing brand of religion and go back to the true teaching of Christ and actually followed what he taught, then maybe the younger generation would turn back.

Sunism and Shia ism are hinduism, denial of truth absolute Allah, based not on true teachings of Islam, but hinduism corruption of true teachings, based on hindu Mithra ism, criminal savior ism, to justify hindu criminal King's or Amir's, another word for a self centered hindu sanatan, filthy goon to be free of La, truth, ism's, not truth, hinduism, corruption of truth absolute, labeled as religion's.

This is true even for questions that seem closely related to religion: birth control, abortion, even teaching Creationism and the role of women in the clergy.

(Another axial religion, Taoism, on the other hand, taught that our true being consists of conformity to the «Tao» from whose «natural» truth and humility we generally stray.)

The wonder is not that legalism and ritualism thus absorbed so large a share of Judaism's thought — the same has been true in all religions, not least in Christianity but that the deeper stream of prophetic teaching still flowed on.

A scholar - theologian who once taught on a theological faculty and later went to a department of religion in a secular university has written poignantly about his pilgrimage through the kind of identity crises I have just described: one who in college had a kind of neo-fundamentalist faith, went through graduate school, established peer relationships with scholars, and then found himself in a crisis of belief, now speaks about the morality of belief — the importance of being true and honest in what one can actually avow and affirm with integrity.

For some of these so called religous leaders it appears that the almighty dollar rises above the true teachings of most religions.

Statistically, if there even is a god, it is far more likely that one of faith has chosen (or been taught without the benefit of making an actual personal choice) the wrong god to believe in or the wrong set of tenets ascribed to that particular god or that the one true religion has either gone extinct or hasn't been formulated yet.

In our view there is an important difference between this factual information being imparted in a descriptive way as part of a wideranging syllabus about different religions, and a curriculum which teaches a particular religion's doctrinal beliefs as if they were objectively true.