Sentences with phrase «true than religion»
The people felt that soccer was more true than religion.
https://www.si.com/ Not exact matches
True — religion is nothing more than some guy telling you what to do — if people worship that, they are stupid enough to have fallen for anything.
no other reason why atheists would reply on a religion blog other than they know its true?
On other subjects — his true feelings toward his own father in particular, virtually the entirety of his youth in general as well as his genuine feelings regarding religion — he could be, and was, tighter than a clam.
The holy book of your respective religion is always true, always right, and always accurate, being inspired of a higher source than human knowledge.
Bill, people choose to embrace a religion because it offers them a narrative they find more appealing than the alternatives of which they're aware, not because there is any evidence it's true.
«If you can imagine a world at peace, with no denominations of religion not without religion but without this my - God - is - bigger - than - your - God thing then it can be true» John Lennon
I can appreciate that religion in general, and christianity as it is oft times practiced has damaged more than a few people, but one might want to ask is that ALWAYS true or sometimes?
The claim, «You don't believe the Bible is true» is nothing more than a smokescreen put up by manipulative religion to discredit or ignore a challenging teaching or idea about the Bible which disagrees or contradicts what that religion teaches.
Whether we place our faith in science, religion, education, government, the justice system or nothing more than the accuracy of the tube map in the front of our diary, each one of us lives by faith in whatever we trust to be reliable and true.
True religion for Amos is a matter of high ethical seriousness, of dealing scrupulously with oneself and others, rather than disinheriting the poor of the land.
In order to truly know that there is no God, or believe it as true (as vehemently as some Atheists do, verily defining a religion of its own), an Atheist has to know a lot more than all of the rest of us on this world.
No religion is true, but some are more disturbing than others.
While it might be true that those who lived in the time of the Prophet could understand religion better than the people of today who must study Islam by means of documents only, we can not ignore the considerable change in the social situation and world conditions during the past fourteen centuries.
For Christianity, although it is a religion in the sense that it links the life of man with the Life of God, is far more than one of the world's great faiths: it is the revelation of the way of true living.
This is different from numbers 2 and 3 because it suggests that there is one religion, the one that converges the fastest, that really is «better» than the others, at least in a functional sense, if not necessarily «truer» in the long run.
I fail to see how going to catholicism suddenly makes his fairy tale book based on no facts suddenly true... oh wait more hypocrisy on the playground because religions cant stand the fact that none of them could be right, or that theirs might not be better than their neighbors.
I find that atheists tend to know more about religion than most believers — or at least that is true of Christians in the US.
False religion teaches everything else other than what true religion teaches.
i was raised as a catholic and the someone told me who Our Saviour really was and His Name and after 45 years i began praying to Our Saviour Using His Name and i always Believed in God but i knew that the christians had it wrong and now i know they did and now without even being in a religion or a community i have found what is True and its better than what christians are saying.
But there is no method by which verifiable measurable results might demonstrate that one god belief / religion is more likely to be true than any other.
To the extent that they are careless about their instruction in the faith, or present its teaching falsely, or even fail in their religious, moral, or social life, they must be said to conceal rather than to reveal the true nature of God and of religion.»
And, let us be frank: is it really so certain that formerly, when religion and the Church played a greater part in public life, men really had more true faith, hope and charity, which, after all, are more important than anything else?
too true; you're right, we are holistic people in a holistic world living holistic lives and political theory, religion, ethics, behavior, psychology, these and many others are all so inextricably intertwined with each other that it may be better to think of them as different views of the same object rather than distinct objects that are inter-related (using «object» here, of course, metaphorically)
Popularity in religion always made Newman worried that something else was afoot in the Church than the true gospel.
His system, moreover, leaves religion in a decidedly secondary status: useful rather than true.
Why don't you simply admit that you have absolutely NO evidence of any gods, you have no idea if your religion is true, and that all religions are nothing more than what MEN made up as if to speak for «god» when they have no idea if there are any gods to begin with.
Is it this: Christianity is the only true religion, even though there is no more evidence that it represents truth than any other religion!
a) you may mock religion as «fairy tales», but logically you still must admit that IF TRUE, the compassion offered there is radically different than what you are talking about.
... I can not say it any better than John Piper «True Christianity — which is radically different from Western culture, and may not be found in many «Christian» churches — renounces the advance of religion by means of violence.
If you deem your «one true religion» to be better than others, and that gives you cause to denigrate them, then you are no better than the Taliban.
MarkinFL, if that were true than we would not have «In God We Trust» (not separation of religion).
Two possibilities determining two basic attitudes, more radical than any difference of race, nationality or even formal religion; and between them runs the true line of the spiritual division of the Earth.
The main tenet of religion and belief in god is faith, which is nothing more than believing in something because you «want» it to be true.
Today, rather than being the true sense of following Christ, it is more widely known as a religion.
The problem is, when people embrace a religion out of fear that it might be true, this is nothing more than Pascal's wager.
i expect that for the majority of the population religion is little more than a footnote and held to be true simply because it is what they have been taught and their daily lives never bring a reason to challenge the belief.
True religion must first come from an inner sense that we are part of something greater than us but can not be reduced by us to any simple description or word or concept.
David «True religion must first come from an inner sense that we are part of something greater than us but can not be reduced by us to any simple description or word or concept»
Versions of those religions are still around today afterall, which actually makes them older than Christianity, therefore more true if we are judging based on the criteria of age.
It's far better to come to God through your own search and journey than to just believe, this is true for all religions and even non religious things I will say this though, I believe that God will judge the world and his ruling will be final.
Free True, and this applies to more than religion.
Richard, saying that atheists are the main source of conflict is borne out by the fact that religions that profess theirs is the only true religion / God and thereby create conflict... is no different than an atheist declaring none of them are true.
Actually, while that may have been true up until not so long ago, I'd say at this point capitalism is more of a hinderance to science than religion is.
It is no good our going on about Scripture if our audience thinks it has been shown to be no truer than the myths of other religions.
We can pay our full respect to the tested structures of authority in our common life, but all conventional human authorities easily assume a finality beyond their competence, and this is nowhere more dangerously true than in the high forms of spiritual authority which belong to religion and its institutions.
I believe that those who would see in modern psychiatry something at once more efficient and more «scientific» than true religion are doomed to disappointment.
Roman Catholicism or Christian Science, Eastern Orthodoxy or Mormonism, Anglicanism or The Society of Friends, and so on through more than two hundred Protestant sects in the United States — which kind of Christianity is the one true religion?
â $ œThe Marxists Farmer had read, and many of the intellectuals he knew, disdained religion, and it was true that some versions of Christianity, and more than a few missionaries, invited impoverished Haitians into what Pere Lafontante called â $ ˜the cult of resignationâ $ ™, into accepting their lot patiently, anticipating the afterlifeâ $ ¦
Qualities which are purported to make religions «unique» are usually talking points designed to convince the believers that their own faith is more objectively true and real, more fulfilling, than others» - this is essentially religious intolerance with a positive spin instead of a negative one.