Sentences with phrase «true value of a dollar»

Traveling can shed light on the true value of a dollar, especially when you venture overseas and convert the greenback into other currencies.

Not exact matches

Its token, which the company says will initially be pegged to the value of one U.S. dollar, strives to become a legitimate medium of exchange, a true crypto - currency as opposed to a crypto - commodity, like Bitcoin.

Now, as the Oracle of Omaha prepares to kick off this year's Berkshire shareholder convention on Saturday, the opposite is true: The vast majority of the stocks Warren Buffett owns have made money over the past year, helping his portfolio gain some $ 16 billion dollars in value.

Of course, the value of a true early entry into one of the massive multibillion - dollar unicorns — perhaps they should be called «thunder lizard» unicornOf course, the value of a true early entry into one of the massive multibillion - dollar unicorns — perhaps they should be called «thunder lizard» unicornof a true early entry into one of the massive multibillion - dollar unicorns — perhaps they should be called «thunder lizard» unicornof the massive multibillion - dollar unicorns — perhaps they should be called «thunder lizard» unicorns?

«But when these investments are not valued daily, and you have no understanding of the true economics of the business, you probably shouldn't be investing your last dollars before retirement.

Most of the stuff that this guy brings out; Old capitalism versus new capitalism, Financial intelligence and education and the importance of both, the possible pitfalls of the American social security system and medicare, Taxation system - who it favors and who it hurts the most, all the stuff about residential homes not being assets, the dollar and how it continues to decline in value and the rest all this stuff is absolutely true.

«Whereas I said Bitcoin «isn't real» because it has no intrinsic or underlying value, that's certainly true of the dollar and other fiat currencies: there's nothing behind them either.

 Almost a quarter of that was the auto aid. It was important for preserving jobs, for sure. But does it count as «stimulus,» in the sense of stimulating expenditure? I don't think so. It was more in the realm of a balance sheet transfer that kept an important company going. If the auto aid was «stimulus,» then so too was the much larger line of credit which Ottawa advanced to the banks (they could have tapped $ 200 billion under Mr. Flaherty's EFF mechanism)-- all of which was also repaid. In that case, Ottawa's «stimulus» was more like a quarter - trillion dollars... far outpacing everyone else in the OECD as a share of GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof that was the auto aid. It was important for preserving jobs, for sure. But does it count as «stimulus,» in the sense of stimulating expenditure? I don't think so. It was more in the realm of a balance sheet transfer that kept an important company going. If the auto aid was «stimulus,» then so too was the much larger line of credit which Ottawa advanced to the banks (they could have tapped $ 200 billion under Mr. Flaherty's EFF mechanism)-- all of which was also repaid. In that case, Ottawa's «stimulus» was more like a quarter - trillion dollars... far outpacing everyone else in the OECD as a share of GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof stimulating expenditure? I don't think so. It was more in the realm of a balance sheet transfer that kept an important company going. If the auto aid was «stimulus,» then so too was the much larger line of credit which Ottawa advanced to the banks (they could have tapped $ 200 billion under Mr. Flaherty's EFF mechanism)-- all of which was also repaid. In that case, Ottawa's «stimulus» was more like a quarter - trillion dollars... far outpacing everyone else in the OECD as a share of GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof a balance sheet transfer that kept an important company going. If the auto aid was «stimulus,» then so too was the much larger line of credit which Ottawa advanced to the banks (they could have tapped $ 200 billion under Mr. Flaherty's EFF mechanism)-- all of which was also repaid. In that case, Ottawa's «stimulus» was more like a quarter - trillion dollars... far outpacing everyone else in the OECD as a share of GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof credit which Ottawa advanced to the banks (they could have tapped $ 200 billion under Mr. Flaherty's EFF mechanism)-- all of which was also repaid. In that case, Ottawa's «stimulus» was more like a quarter - trillion dollars... far outpacing everyone else in the OECD as a share of GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof which was also repaid. In that case, Ottawa's «stimulus» was more like a quarter - trillion dollars... far outpacing everyone else in the OECD as a share of GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof GDP! Of course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsOf course that's nonsense. This was just one of many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof many ways that Ottawa inflated the true value of its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffsof its stimulus effort last year (including counting as «stimulus» the increase in EI payouts that automatically accompanied last year's mass layoffs).

The same is true for the actions of the Federal Reserve, because they are messing with the value of the US Dollars we hold.

That home might have sold for thousands of dollars under its true market value because of this.

One clarification: You say that «half the value of the Sleepy Portfolio is denominated in US dollars,» but this is not quite true.

All of the above is true even if the current yield of your portfolio flat - lines, as it probably will (due to the increasing dollar value of your portfolio).

At the same time, the reverse is also true: If a stock rises 10 % on New York, but falls 5 % for Canadian investors due to a decrease in the U.S. dollar, a holder of a hedged ETF would still only see a 10 % rise in the value of that holding as part of their hedged ETF.

Measuring the benefits humans receive from the environment and putting a dollar value on them allows us to better understand the true cost of environmental degradation and provides us with tools to make informed decisions about resource management trade - offs.

Some estimate that the COLI and BOLI policies in the US are worth billions of dollars, but that rank and file employees whose lives are being insured are rarely aware of the policies» true value.

Recognizing Our Accomplished Realtors Awards was a marvellous way to include the Public into the inner workings of what it takes for Realtors to deviop into true professionals, at our personal expense; rather than concentrating on sales Production, members of Million Dollar Clubs etc which encourage the Public to believe we are all Millionaires and only interested in making money more than giving value.

In other words that one million dollar house today has a true value of only one hundred thousand dollars when taking 1980's mortgage rates into account..

This dollar amount will be an estimate only since the true value of the home for down payment purposes won't be available until after the appraisal process is complete.

We are moving at the end of January to a 1700's New England colonial and could sure use some True Value dollars!