Sentences with phrase «truer than history»

Gandhi too said that he did not care whether the crucifixion was historically true, it was truer than history.

Not exact matches

More than an engrossing collection of historical true - crime stories, though, the book functions as an unlikely financial history of the young United States, as it grew «from a patchwork of largely self - governing colonies to a loosely assembled union of states and, finally, to a single nation under firm federal control.»

For Poland to be something other than the claustrophobic Soviet puppet - state it had been since 1945 — for Poland to be itself, true to its character and history — Poland had to live in the truth: It had to be a country in which 2 + 2 always equaled 4.

History shows the opposite to be true: countries that most aggressively pursue trade and investment with the outside world prosper more than inward - oriented nations.

The books of the New Testament were closer in time to the actual event than most histories of that time or earlier that are generally accepted as true.

In this instance we may be clearer about the meaning and the consequences than about the «facts» in themselves, but this would be true of other momentous events in history.

Very separate history than true Protestants.

This is true especially in a period of history in which man has been burdened with deciding his own destiny in far greater measure than it has ever been the case, and even possible, before.

A look into history will quickly convince any interested person that the true church has almost always suffered more from prosperity than from poverty.

Here Geyer's reading is truer to the facts than Johnson's, as he takes account of what he calls «the burdens of history.»

this just shows that the world is getting weirder by the day... the pope is right, the world is experiencing amnesia nowadays... people especially in the west tends to have this amnesia coz they believe that they can live without God... they believe that they do nt need Him coz, they still able to survive... BUT what they do nt realize what these are all temporary... just look at the crisis going on right now... maybe God is still a mystery coz only FAITH can conquer mystery... can anybody out there lead me to any person who can create simply a tree, a true living tree... we know for sure that there are some who can create furnitures out from a tree... im really bothered that the world will end sooner than later... GOD FORBIDS... history just keeps on repeating itself... what a pity for the small children and the coming generation...

Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.

It is true that one can find among individual theologians support for an «inerrancy» position throughout the history of the church, but it is also true that these same theologians often exercise in their exegesis much greater freedom than Lindsell's or Schaeffer's interpretation of their theory would seem to allow.

It is true that we are more immediately affected by images than by concepts and that through Christian history much of the attention of theologians has been properly directed to the fashioning and refashioning of images.

If you properly engage in this work, you will be interested in arriving at a position on whatever it is that interests you (philosophy, critical theory, history, philology, literary criticism, or whatever) that is preferable to any other that you know of on that question, and you will concomitantly want to be clear as to what the position that you construct and defend is, what it excludes, how best to show that its competitors are less adequate than the one you want to defend, and in what sense this is true.

This claim, however, is open to the decisive objection that it could not be true unless human culture and history were radically other than we must suppose them to be.

In all cases, however, to accept such statements as true is to challenge the full autonomy of science and history within their own proper spheres; and it is this challenge to a genuinely secular outlook, rather than any particular statement in itself, which makes classical theism so widely unacceptable to contemporary men.

This is the idea that as human history progressed, God revealed more and more of Himself to humanity, so that the later portions of Scripture more accurately reveal the true nature of God than the earlier portions (see chapters 2, 11).

The most convincing part of the Bible is that regardless if you think its true or not it contains the story of the only Person in human history that made the outlandish claims (too many to recount) that he made and STILL has followers today; more than 2000 yrs after his assasination.

If that were true then all the people throughout history who have died rather than convert or deny their god, would be evidence that there is no god.

If it is true that there is more heavenly rejoicing over the lost sheep that is found than over the sheep that have not strayed, God's embrace shows one important sense in which the history that began with the eating of forbidden fruit in the Garden and that will end in the heavenly city is a good one.

They try to interpret Genesis from our present situation rather than understand the true biblical history of the world and the changes that have occurred because of sin.

I do not find this so strongly in other process thinkers, and insofar as Muray will not be more specific than that the criterion for reconstituting a tradition is «whatever contributes to the enhancement of relationality and creativity that are true of the fundamental character of reality itself» (93), I do not think he will much like the basis of Hauerwas» critique, namely the stories of the history of Israel and Jesus as they continue to be remembered and enacted in the Christian church.

This is even more clearly true of Paul and John, both of whom require no more of history than the «that» of the life of Jesus and his crucifixion for their proclamation.

He brought it back to Wisconsin and used it to color his cheese and history was made (or so she says, I have no proof to back that story up, other than her family is very deep in cheese money so it could be true).

It is entirely possible that this sauce is is really the stuff of legends rather than true hot sauce history, because it's difficult to track down any really substantive further information.

Not sure why you've been thumbed down, it's perfectly true, and they are one of the founder members of the Football League, no one has a greater history than them.

This is more true about Wenger, prior to the new backroom imports this season, than possibly any manager in the history of British football.

His true shooting percentage this past season (0.703) was higher than any player in Mizzou history.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

and ti liken wenger to that is criminal.you notice that when we loose a game like yesterday there were more than 100 comments on this site, but when we win a game barely less 50 comments.So asks yourself do we have true fans or just cry babies.That's fans opinion do not count at arsenal and rightly so We have the most disrespectful fans in football history and they shall receive their reward.

This is especially true in the age of technology, in which new information is being discovered and disseminated more quickly than at any other time in human history.

Always more pleased with itself than its record would warrant, social democracy must now make a true reckoning with that history if it is to emerge from the current crisis as a continuing force for progressive change.

This is especially true for younger gay men, who are being infected at a higher rate than others, and people who have a history of substance use and heterosexual men.»

If calories in, calories out were 100 percent true and we «cracked the code» we wouldn't have more overweight or obese people than any time in recorded history.

The reasons include human history, western culture, conflicts of interest at the government and other levels, humans who love good news about bad habits whether that news is true or not, and a failed media who cares more about sensationalism and making money than spreading the truth..

The history that I tell is true and the merry service in line of dating is the best place to be found than the homosexual one singles on line.

Make your sappy true - life tabloid story, but at the very least take a small amount of time flipping back over the entire history of music in search of a cut that's more interesting, more vital than the god - damn Passenger — something which doesn't instantly remind you of many other, better movies.

In fact, throughout gaming history, there have been fewer true horror titles than you'd think.

Synopsis: This is the true story of Frida Kahlo (Salma Hayek) and her husband Diego Rivera (Alfred Molina), the larger - than - life painters who became the most acclaimed artists in Mexican history, and whose tempestuous love affair, landmark journeys to America, and outrageous personalities made them legendary.

Unlike The Silent Revolution, The Captain's narrative focus is not on the victims (who eventually become victors) of history but the perpetrators — a true rarity in the history of German cinema that is made even more remarkable by the fact that the film does not concern itself with the famous culprits (as does Oliver Hirschbiegel's Der Untergang [Downfall, 2004]-RRB- but, rather, with the «unknown» wrongdoers, that is, the «little guys» who, once afforded the opportunity, displayed the same murderous tendencies than their more famous leaders.

HELEN MIRREN, «WOMAN IN GOLD» Based on the true story of Maria Altmann, who battled the Republic of Austria in court over a famous painting of her aunt that was stolen by Nazis, «Woman in Gold» is more than a reminder of the remarkable twists and turns history can take.

Spielberg began to grapple with history in earnest with a true - life tale of a man who, after living with no particularly strong moral convictions, saved more than a thousand Jews from Nazi concentration camps.

Just like when I watched Titanic, I sat through Valkyrie hoping that maybe all of history was wrong and that the end was going to be different than what I knew to be true but, alas, it was not.

Diego Luna's «Cesar Chavez» bears some weight courtesy of its true roots, but the abundance of information and lack of heart makes it feel more like a history lesson rather than a dynamic cinematic experience.

If its first hour feels more like a lecture than entertainment, Spielberg goes on to bring it all home in a way that should please history buffs and general audiences alike — even though, true to the filmmaker's form, it has at least three endings.

is one with much more wit than any regular «kids» movie, and can be enjoyed more by audience members who actually understand the true history behind featured characters like Darwin, Queen Victoria, and more.

In looking at the short history of direct - to - video Disney sequels, as well as comparing and contrasting the 1950 gem Cinderella with the 2002 clunker Cinderella II: Dreams Come True, it will be clear that for more than a decade, the heads of production at Disney were sacrificing quality and bastardizing classic films merely for quick financial gain.

A true page out of the traditional Ferrari history book, the 1964 Ferrari 275 GTB / C Speciale contains within a 320 - hp (70 hp more than the standard GTB road car), 3.3 - liter dry - sump V - 12 engine with six Weber 38 DCN carburetors, mated to a five - speed manual transaxle transmission.

For years, there have been better compact sedans than the Toyota Corolla, and that's truer now than ever before in the car's long history.