Sentences with phrase «truly known the answer»

The dating consultant for SurviveWomen.com explains that the only person who truly knows the answer to this question is the man himself.

This question has been asked very often, and no - one has truly known the answer.

Not exact matches

But, if you hesitated on answering any of these culture fit type questions, and questioned whether you would truly enjoy working with this person, then just say no.

The answers to these questions are the psychographics of your customer base, and you need to know this information to truly understand who's buying what you're selling.

Did you know that a truly comprehensive retirement calculator can do A LOT more than answer the questions most of us know to ask: When you can retire?

I know these aren't the best answers, because I truly don't have all of them (OMG!

I pray you won't get to that point because Jesus truly does love you and died for you just believe and be saved, but sadly I already know your answer.

But don't listen to me, I am brilliant enough to have all the answers or to truly understand all there is to know as it seems most do.

If you truly STUDY the Bible (not go to church one hour a week or serve the homeless or DO this or that — but STUDY) then you will KNOW the answer for yourself.

Agnosticism is really the best position to hold, because we truly don't know the real answers to any of these questions.

Tell God you truly want to know if He exists, and if you are sincere in wanting to know this, God will answer you.

If you truly want to know whether or not God exists, the answer will never be found in a black box.

If you answer no to either of those questions then you will know how unimportant your belief system truly is in reality.

Adopting «in Jesus» name» as the necessary minimal condition for a counting as a «Christian congregation» for the purpose of a theological school's study does not, of course, require any particular answer to the quite different question whether God is truly known and worshiped by groups who do not worship in Jesus» name or whether God is redemptively present to them.

Thus for each of us, the exacting and inescapable question, which must be faced and answered, is the question of our total mortal life as we are now living it, a question which arises from our mortality with the responsibility which that entails, which puts itself to us in the form of our measuring up to the possibility of becoming authentically ourselves, and which issues in our realization (not so much in thought as in deeply felt experience as existing men) of blessedness, as we know ourselves becoming what we truly are, or in destruction or damnation, as we know ourselves both frustrated men and failures in our human fulfillment.

But if you really and truly want to quit drinking liquor for good and all, and sincerely feel that you must have some help, we know that we have an answer for you.

Taking this book literally, after thousands of years of disproof and casual coincidence, is no better or worse than getting your life's answers from anything else... all that truly matters is that you're inspired, truth is subjective... facts are not.

- Only needed to be sorted out for lay 10 yearsGilberto was our last truly class player in this most specialised position with only Alex Song (never the answer but at least knew his job and worth to the team) being anywhere near the type of player we needed.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

No one can truly answer this question except for you and your little one, no matter which Infantino carrier review you read.

Only you can answer that, because only you know what's truly right for you.

Most will be happy to answer your questions, and you will truly know the source of your food.

They do tote «spiritual» inspired advertiseing; most of which is probably not totally true for the non-religious, but with little research ACTUALLY done, and no truly applicable studies conducted with the purpose of discovering this answer, can't have a certain yes or no.

They do tote «spiritual» inspired advertiseing; most of which is probably not totally true, but with little research ACTUALLY done, and no truly applicable studies condicted with the purpose of discovering this answer, can't have a certainly yes or no.

I would not know what to answer with regards to my most common starting point because it truly depends.

The fact is, it's never too late to clean your life up and that's why I'm (re) posting this as I felt it was truly inspirational for young and older worldly people alike who are perhaps thinking of getting married and pondering the; «should I not have sex before marriage» question (the answer to which is incredibly obvious from reading The bible and yet we all get bogged down in questioning it's clear abstinence stance on the issue because the world confuses Christians and no - Christians alike).

To answer the rhetorical question posed by the above subheading: no, indeed there truly is nowt better.

I am looking for a real woman who is ready to love me 100 % just as much as i am ready to give her my love.I am here for a real relationship and i am not the type that flirts around, so anyone who is flirting around might not be lucky with me, but if you are truly ready for a real relationship, don't get by, say something and this might be an answer to your prayers.I am from a very good background and where i live has influenced me so well that i know all that i am required of as a husband and will discharge my qualities accordingly.

Dreamland offers some simple advice for improved sleep (basic behavior modification trumped sleeping pills in one study cited here), but the real fun is finding out how little we truly know about roughly one - third of our time on earth, and the wild and wide - ranging paths we've taken in search of answers.

Unless this question is answered, we do not really know if the cat food is truly «non-GMO»: i.e., the food that is sourced for cat food was fed non-GMO while it was being raised.

You are truly an angel here on Earth for answering questions and I know God will find a place for you some day... A couple of questions that I have: Is it that «confirmation» lab test that is sent out that tells me what «Stage» Riley is in?

We ask them the hard questions regarding Pet Insurance that you TRULY want to know the answers too!

If the answer is no, then it's hard to say that your annual credit is truly «saving» you money and you may want to reconsider if the value of that particular benefit is applicable to you.

If anyone truly wanted to know the answers to the many questions, they'd employ real DBA's, with real databases, a real programing language, a couple of good programmers (the one writing the Harryreadme, was obviously a good one.)

Of course the only way to truly avoid a hangover is, yes, you know the answer: don't drink.

Answering the questions above can help you know whether you are living a truly sustainable life.

Answering those questions can be difficult for most people, Maister says, because they truly do not know what they want.

You can never be truly satisfied until you know the answer to this question.

A sample answer might highlight your passion and skills: «I truly enjoy getting to know graduates as well as companies and helping them find their technical direction, so I'm very excited about bringing those strengths and interests of mine to this role.»

No one can give you a truly good answer without first knowing some basic things — and that takes more than just a quick glance at your resume's format and words.

No one has all the answers, and a family counseling program can be truly helpful to any family no matter their circumstance or situation.

These are the kinds of questions that can only truly be answered once you get to know someone.

I want you to know that I am answering your text because it truly showed that you have erred.

It never ceases to amaze me how badly some of the people in our industry answer questions for people who wouldn't be asking if they truly knew anything about mortgages.

You were truly great at keeping me grounded and for always being there to answer all my questions (and god knows there was a lot of them).