To
truly understand climate, researcher need a global records that reaches back hundreds of years.
Not exact matches
We need more empirical studies to
truly understand who will be most affected by
climate change in the future.»
Together, they will help us
truly understand the natural sensitivity of Earth system and provide a better framework for predicting future
climate change.»
If true, I am
truly freaked out that any
climate site would want someone who does not
understand economics,
climate, nor solutions.
Your spurious sarcasm language aside the increase in knowledge about
climate science over the last 25 years has been
truly impressive (for example our
understanding of how the increased heat retention gets moved around the planetary system).
I am
truly amazed that so few people (warmists in particular I guess) have done so little research on their own to try and
understand Climate Change.
This last
truly demonstrates the abysmal
understanding of error analysis at large in the ranks of
climate modelers.
Until we
truly understand ALL the mechanisms by which the sun drives our
climate, it is premature to conclude that AGW was the principal driving force of global temperature over the late - 20th century IMO.
Max, «Until we
truly understand ALL the mechanisms by which the sun drives our
climate, it is premature to conclude that AGW was the principal driving force of global temperature over the late - 20th century IMO.»
Only a solid of
understanding of natural
climate change can prevent this
climate insanity and pave the way to
truly scientifically based adaptive measures.
If we are to
truly prepare for the dangers of
climate change and build more resilient environments, we must first
understand natural
climate change.
Which one is more likely: All basic thermodynamics and stat mech textbooks are wrong, including the ones that make showing that there is no lapse rate a homework problem or that do it in the actual text, or some people who have a really hard time
understanding what a degree of freedom is or how to do an integral or mess with logarithmic expansions have made a mistake, the biggest of which is assuming that the DALR worked out in
climate systems is stable in the absence of a driving thermal gradient and that air is locally
truly «adiabatic», instead of just having a thermal conductivity that is slower than convection?
Meanwhile, fantastical reports emerge every day stoking fears of
climate change and attributing every possible ill to a supposed evil that none
truly understands.
The emerging science points to a complex interplay between manmade global warming, natural
climate variability, and sea ice dynamics that scientists are only just beginning to
truly understand.
Adults tend to assume the needs and wishes of their children through their own viewpoints, and though they are only assumptions, these continue to steer divorce policies and the overall
climate of divorce without seeking to
truly understand the child.