As much as I think ALL religion is a crock and that common sense should
trump religious dogma, to force people who don't want to use the service is just as wrong as the church trying to deny it to everyone regardless of their faith.
Go to the T said — In America, religious liberty should alway
trump religious beliefs.
We've got a long way to go before civil rights truly
trump religious immunity.
Thankfully in the USA,, USA law
trumps religious ones.
Politics definitely
trumps religious considerations once again in American Christianity as it has in Western European Christianity since the «conversion» of Constantine and the institutionalization of Christianity of the official religion of the Roman Empire.
When data shows no warming for 16 years, that
trumps religious belief that CO2 warming must be still accelerating.
There is no heirarchy of rights where gender equality
trumps religious freedom.
Not exact matches
At some point, I suspect the Supreme Court will need to rule on which right
trumps the other —
religious freedom or freedom to wed..
Personally, I against any politician who believes his
religious beliefs
trump mine.
Answer: He'd «tick off»
religious leaders so much that they'd have him executed on
trumped up charges.
Well, it's because no
religious value, rule, law, tenet, or bit of dogma EVER
trumps this nation's laws and we all agree on that, otherwise you might as well make the sleazy pope President and let the Ayatollah Khomeni be Vice President and we will live under
religious sharia law with death for anyone who speaks blasphemy or who «dishonors» any
religious figure whether real or not.
Religious zealots think the rules of their gods
trump human law.
What cracks me up is the
religious attack our science... we have their god pushed all the way back to TBB... they seem to lose track of the fact that their beliefs are based on, at minimum 1350 year old thinking (quaran) and somehow ancient philosophy can
trump The Big Bang and the solid science that its based on.
Exit polls said that «same
religious views»
trumped, «can beat Obama».
Also, the fact that this team felt as if their personal,
religious decisions should somehow
trump their agreement to league rules.
How does the Liberal Democrat determine the right to birth control should
trump right to
religious liberty?
«
Religious arguments,» he writes, «must never
trump the protection of children's basic human rights.
The problem with the Far
Religious Right is that they feel their religious rights trump everyone's rights
Religious Right is that they feel their
religious rights trump everyone's rights
religious rights
trump everyone's rights, period.
Under the most extreme conditions, the cultural -
religious survival of the Jewish people altogether
trumps the physical survival of any individual Jew.
The argument more or less says that these hypothetical «good» people realize that what they're doing to others is harmful, but that their
religious convictions, like love of God,
trump their innate morality.
Science does not disprove our
religious inclinations, and religion does not
trump science in terms of what is measureable.
There's many
religious head coverings in the world, but a
religious custom should not
trump public safety.
Our Supreme Law is the Const!tution and it
trumps your Bible, your religion, and your
religious laws.
However, you lost me at Our Supreme Law is the Const!tution and it
trumps your Bible, your religion, and your
religious laws.
I'm pretty sure the 1st Amendment right to freedom of
religious expression
trumps that VERY small price for a HANDFUL of people.
Then Know this as truth in God's Word, when Satan comes 1st on the six
trump (666), he will be using the four hidden dynasties (Political,
Religious, Educational, and Economical.)
I believe that the evangelicals and catholics pushing the issue are the ones actually stomping on
religious freedom, they are mocking a system that will
trump theirs any day... the us government.
The
religious organization is now claiming that it's rights, as a
religious organization,
trump those of actual living people.
The question is where such core
religious teachings can and should «
trump» cultural practices, and how consensus can be achieved on these divisive issues.
Indeed, in some ways, Sehat's minimalist state is already here: Courts at the state and federal levels have used expansive government «interests» as reasons to
trump protected
religious exercise.
And if any of the employees that work for Hobby Lobby don't happen to share their onesided
religious beliefs, their right to this health care option should be
trumped by Hobby Lobby's personal views?
While I respect a person's right to
religious freedom, I don't think that a parent's
religious right should
trump the health rights of their child.
Religious convictions appear to
trump party loyalty.
Single - issue positions like being Pro-Life or Pro-Choice seem to
trump any party loyalty, even
religious affiliation.
I mean, their opposition to «gay marriage» for example is founded on
religious beliefs they believe to be objectively true, to which any deviation is an offence against God - naturally, this will
trump any commitment to pluralism or relativism, as your appeal for a «secular state» seems to be about.
Yes, public officials generally must take an oath to carry out the law and duties of the office, and it would clearly be unworkable to permit the personal
religious beliefs of such officials — whatever they may be — to
trump their public duties.
Another case where
religious / political views
trump reason.
The bottom line continues to be that belief, particularly
religious belief,
trumps data.
Human rights are far from universal, and individuals who believe that
religious mandates
trump individual rights are plentiful and all too often in power, attempting to actually institute the horror that is Old Testament law, literally applied, but fortunately «the West» remains steadfastly in favor of heresy and an individual's right to choose what to believe (including the choice to believe nothing at all) and the individual's right to not have their moral behavior dictated in law and enforced by threat of violence by a set of
religious rules with which they do not agree.
But Keith Porteous Wood, of the National Secular Society (NSS) warned that a victory for the four would be «bad news» for employers and gay people, adding: «Any further accommodation of
religious conscience in UK equality law would create a damaging hierarchy of rights, with religion
trumping all.»
Justice Abella felt that the interests of the Hutterites
trumped the province's policy concerns and that the community's
religious beliefs made the very taking of a photograph a form of indirect coercion.
However,
religious requirements should not provide a
trump card against legal justifications or security considerations.