Sentences with phrase «truth about christianity»

If you want some help understanding the truth about Christianity do a search and find Ravi Zacharias.

the truth about Christianity, which is not a man made religion ----- Wrong.

Can really learn the truth about Christianity from Pat Robertson?

Not exact matches

I mean, a philosopher or scientist can talk about any of the things Christians talk bout without using the «wrapper» (transcendence, god, truth, love, etc.), which begs the question, why talk about these things through Christianity at all?

Making a judgement about a faith, be it Christianity or Islam, on the basis of a few extremists has about the same logical errancy as saying evolution is false because Hitler's murderous race purification rampage was fueled by his study of Darwin's theory, a truth written by Hitler himself.

As a retired Pope, he will never be a free person, but kept under hose arrest and supervised, to stop him from speaking truth about college of hindu Mithra ism, racist savior ism, labeled as Christianity to hind fool humanity.

Do some research about your precious Christianity, the truth can no longer be kept secret.

Consider the truth about Catholicism, Mormonism, Judaism, Evangelicals, Christianity and Islam and all other religions and ask yourself the following question.

And all of Carl's observations are about the truth about the state of nature that somehow vindicate both Christianity and Coen - style nihilism.

Atheists decry the claim of Christianity to having truth exclusive to only believers, without realizing that the claims they make about truth and reality actually are just as exclusive and less factually - based.

I gradually began to see that Christianity is not about solitary seekers after truth who just get together once in a while for a chat: other people are very much part of the divine scheme of things — even scripture has come down to us through the agency of other people.

Talking to the magazine he started 60 years ago, Christianity Today, Graham said: «I have never witnessed as much confusion as there is today about where to find truth.

The prolific Jesuit scholar, Fr James Schall, now in his eighties, has given us this book about the pleasure of knowing the truth of things, in particular the delight of discovering coherence from reflecting upon diverse aspects of existence, of realising that all sorts of «scraps of evidence» point to the fact that only Christianity provides an adequate account of our existence.

Now if we regard all real religions as attempts to get at a special kind of truth to provide some answer to man's intuitions about his own nature, we shall, I believe, find that what we know as «Christianity» comprehends, develops and fulfills all that at heart we hold to be true.

The stuffy materialism, the lack of purpose, the uncertainty about moral values and the collapse of belief in anything beyond the tomb, are not in themselves a rejection of Christianity so much as a cri de cœur the truth of the Gospel.

If that doesn't sound like your Christianity, it's because you weren't listening when Jesus said we are supposed to be hated by everyone, including our unbelieving family members, and that we are supposed to be persecuted and despised and called bad names and crucified every single day for telling the truth about who He is — the reason He was crucified.

In the second segment, the protagonist, Charles Ryder, muses on what he had once been taught about Christianity in terms that took me back to that joke, and to Rowan Williams «sitting and breathing in the presence of the question mark» while «waiting on the truth:»

Please tell me what is «bitter» about telling the truth about how Christianity is promoted at gunpoint.

When we approach this university community with the message that we are an open church espousing a progressive Christianity, we will be speaking the truth about our ongoing process.

We learn from Manent that Pascal was right that Christianity knows man — or embodies in its theology an anthropology that tells the truth about who we are.

Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.

«Whatever is the truth about Christian origins elsewhere in the Syriac speaking area, the Christianity of Aphrahat and Ephrem is best accountable for a break away movement among the Jewish community in Adiabene.

That is to say, even if sin be ignorance (or what Christianity would perhaps prefer to call stupidity), which in one sense can not be denied, we have to ask, is this an original ignorance, is it always the case that one has not known and hitherto could not know anything about the truth, or is it a superinduced, a subsequent ignorance?

Not because I don't think Christianity is true and the kids, like all sinners, need to know the truth, but because teachers who don't know all the basics about the Bible would mess it up or if they were an atheist being forced to teach it would probably spread their bias and teach things wrongly on purpose.

I am not doubting the truth of «Christianity» (or as Stephen pointed out... the truth about Jesus Christ), but only how we assert and defend that truth.

«Some people seem to think that I began by asking myself how I could say something about Christianity to children; then fixed on the fairy tale as an instrument; then collected information about child - psychology and decided what age group I'd write for; then drew up a list of basic Christian truths and hammered out «allegories» to embody them.

This self - consciousness of Christianity about its distinctive truth is understandable when the Church finds itself opposed by a demonic religion such as Nazism.

Pagan myths express certain truths about God through the images that mythmakers have found at their disposal, Lewis explained, but Christianity is God's myth expressed «through what we call «real things.»»

One comment here about Rainer Braendlein... if he has any Truth of Christianity in him, he came by it through the Catholic Church... just as any protestant does.

The irony seems to be that only if we are first clear theologically about the truth and cogency of Christianity are we able to encounter with clarity and sympathy the world's range of peoples and contexts.

The respect with which he has treated Christianity demands that he tell the truth about Jewish - Christian dialogue.

Whether in fact this was the effect of the author's proposal about Paul is a historical question; but at issue in this question is the success or failure of the proposal in early Christianity, as well as its truth or falsity, but not its interest for us.

The reflection it prompts about Christianity's roots in Judaism has importance independent of the truth of the proposal.

Please don't start your postings again about you «know» christianity is the truth and all other religions are lies, bs..

«I want to explain how I became convinced, by reason and experience, of the necessity and Tightness of a form of Christianity that is modest, accommodating and thoughtful - but ultimately uncompromising about its vital truth.»

So the next time someone asks me about the future of evangelical Christianity or whether I belong in that «camp,» or who's got the upper - hand, I'm just going to tell them the truth: hell if I know.

His twisting of Christianity for his own personal gain reveals the truth about him.

Christianity is NOT a religion is the truth about Life and the Hereafter.

Newbigin is absolutely right that Christianity, or at any rate Christian mission and apologetics, is always involved in a pluralist tension — the tension between confidence in God and uncertainty about living out that truth in the world, between faith as God's gift and understanding as a form of growing discovery, between knowing who God is and seeking to bring that knowledge into situations of despair or resistance, not to say anything about the diversity and conflict of views among self - avowed Christians.

The percentage of secularists willing to face the ugly truth about Islam will always be relatively low; too many of them are still engaged in fighting the last war, against the Christianity or orthodox Judaism of their parents.

Consider the truth about Catholicism, Islam, Mormonism, Judaism, Evangelicals and Christianity and all other religions and ask yourself the following question.

Truth be told there are about 20 credible texts other than the Holy Bible that reference Jesus, some are entire books contesting the doctrines of Christianity.

Jones does not defend this claim about Christianity's truth but rather spells out its communal and theological expression.

What is misguided about these attempts, Stackhouse seems consistently to say, is that (however unintentionally) they imply that Christianity can not make rational truth claims or, if it does, that there are no rational criteria by which they may be assessed.

If he is correct Christianity has completely missed basic truth and he is about only one who hasn't.

When I first read Mere Christianity about thirty years ago, while I fully agreed that how the death of Jesus works was not nearly as important as the truth that it works, I intended to do my best in learning how.

The thing about «blind alleys,» I really don't know what you are getting at, but if they are inspired by God and are writing truth and transformation that is closer to Jesus I wouldn't call that a blind alley, that's the true North of christianity, whether Catholic or protestant.

Plano, TX About Blog Radically Christian exists to promote the restoration of First Century Christianity, through the use of Twenty - First Century media and technology; presenting biblical truth with simplicity, love, and passion.

Plano, TX About Blog Radically Christian exists to promote the restoration of First Century Christianity, through the use of Twenty - First Century media and technology; presenting biblical truth with simplicity, love, and passion.

About Blog As a philosopher and theologian, I have a great passion to help people understand the reasonableness and relevance of Christianity's truth claims.