Sentences with phrase «truth claims made»

To me it seems pretty clear that while things may change with further research, at this point in time, the truth claims made by people promoting these products are more of a marketing artifact than a scientific conclusion.

As I explain in this article, if you look a little deeper into the science behind inositol supplements there are a lot of fairly misleading truth claims made, especially when it comes to the heavily promoted product Ovasitol, and inositol's effect on fertility and weight loss.

There are, to be sure, several moments in which he seems altogether serious about the truth claims made for his vision.

I simply believe that the Bible is true in a different way than you believe it is true, and I believe that the truth claims it makes are different than the truth claims you believe it makes.

Whereas for ordinary theologians this character does not weaken the truth claims we make but deepens and enriches them, most scientist - theologians are skeptical of talk about myth and metaphor.

Not exact matches

Like all backlashes, this one replaced one kind of irrational extremism with another, and a timeless truth — that making something great and claiming it as yours are two sides of the same marketing coin — was the casualty.

Facebook itself has repeatedly claimed that it's not a media company, and has no interest in making editorial judgments — and that it's largely up to users to sift truth from lies.

Assange has made a point of comparing his organization to traditional media outlets, saying in a recent opinion piece in the Post that his motive «is identical to that claimed by the New York Times and the Post — to publish newsworthy content,» and that WikiLeaks publishes material «irrespective of whether sources came by that truth legally or have the right to release it.»

They must go by the basic truth - in - advertising principle, meaning that endorsers can't make claims that marketers can't legally make, and that the endorsement must be the endorser's truthful opinion.

Daniels is seeking $ 75,000 in damages, according to the Wall Street Journal, and claims she had to hire bodyguards and suffered damage to her reputation as a result of Trump's online smear, which the lawsuit alleges Trump made with «reckless disregard» for the truth.

Simply seeking truth won't get you published, tenured, or paid, so she's making outlandish, meritless claims, that get her face on CNN, that get people so riled up, that hopefully, one or two of them will buy her books.

The atheist who claims to come from a «faith» background is extremely confused and more to be pitied than admired.Had the supposed «believer» continued in the «faith» they claim to have forsaken, they would ultimately have appeared before God and been rejected.These were deceived, they never met God, they never knew God and they never understood God.They are devoid of the Truth and twice lost.There is hope while they still breathe Gods gift of life that they might someday meet and be reconciled to God, but their lying nature makes salvation less likely.Debate with them is an exercise in futility.God bless

I make no claims to «T» truth.

♦ Carl Trueman argues that confessions establish constitutional restraints on church power: «In an age when words, especially words that make truth claims, are always suspected of being part of some manipulative power game, it is perhaps counterintuitive to think of confessions as delimiting the power of the church.

People are evil, and in need of a savior, and no atheist can make an exclusive claim otherwise without claiming to have a basis for their «objective» truth.

* sigh *, You are making a claim to truth without proof.

[«While these claims have been made repeatedly over the last century, the truth of the matter is that skeptics and liberal theologians are unable to cite a single piece of solid archaeological evidence in support of their claims.

Fortunately for us, the argument ought not to be about our personal validity, but to the objective claims we make about the truths of scripture and the essential elements that genuine Christian faith has and does contribute to society.

Discoveries are made and some of these contradict what the bible has claimed as «truth».

Atheists decry the claim of Christianity to having truth exclusive to only believers, without realizing that the claims they make about truth and reality actually are just as exclusive and less factually - based.

I always put it this way: I am an atheist in the sense that I reject all man - made truth claims about a deity.

A group that claims a sincere religious belief in staying high all the time will probably lose its ease, not because it is necessarily insincere but because any drug defendant could make that claim and courts have no good way to know who is telling the truth.

Since a theory or definition of politics makes a claim to truth, it must be divorced from any specific preference.

Many historical truth claims are true when they are made, but are not true later.

Lindbeck is often accused of being an anti-realist or constructivist, the idea that truth claims humans make are simply ones that we make up and «construct» ourselves with no real relationship with the way things really are.

This does not mean that doctrines are not normative or do not make truth claims, for they surely do.

It was not meant to be a proposal for an all - encompassing theory for making religious truth claims but, rather, an intramural Christian conversation about secondary matters of faith.

The claim is routinely made that because there are numerous religions, all with their own take on truth, that that fact in and of itself precludes the possibility that one is true.

And if Christianity does not capture the truth of God, then surely neither does any individual branch or denomination of Christendom, despite the claims of little minds made through the centuries.

You have made this claim against me on more than one occasion but the truth of the matter is that we are talking about two totally different concepts.

I think that is true — well, if you assume Judaism and Christianity are making «truth claims» but if you are a liberal in those faiths, you don't care.

@Tony I never ceased to be amazed by the number fo people that claim to be seekers of truth while at the same time arrogantly proclaiming that all those that reach different conclusions than they do are just making the bible say what they want it to say.

has about it something of a demand for a pedigree, which might at least lend some credibility to the claims Christ makes for himself; for want of which, Pilate can do little other than pronounce his truth: «I have power to crucify thee» (which, to be fair, would under most circumstances be an incontrovertible argument).

A recent study in a feminist periodical presents considerable evidence that reductionist stereotypes of Eddy that are still current, even among feminists, sprang to a surprising extent from resentment directed toward her as a woman making serious truth claims in a male - dominated society (Jean McDonald, «Mary Baker Eddy and the Nineteenth Century «Public» Woman: A Feminist Reappraisal, «Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion [Spring, 1986], pp. 89 - 112).

Evolutionists make no claim for perpetual truth, though creationists often do (and then attack us falsely for a style of argument that they themselves favor).

But even when the Bible is misunderstood and misused by false truth - claims, that does not make the Bible wrong.

If you want to make this distinction in 1 John 3:4 - 10, then you must also apply it to 1 John 1:8 «Anyone who claims to be without deliberate sin is a liar and the truth is not in him.»

The Holy Spirit teaches us all things; we speak of the things that the Spirit brings; truth reduced to language and writing (again); we continue to remind one another (in speech, script & action); meanwhile philosophy makes claim upon the derivatives, often assuming even to authorship.

From Peirce's claim that we can make our ideas clear by considering their conceivable practical effects, to James's notion of truth's cash value in experiential terms, to Dewey's own view of the practical character of reality, the message seems to be that philosophy has more to offer than a therapeutic stance toward social issues and a rhetorical presentation of new suggestions.

Different genres make different kinds of truth claims.

They believe that such language is defined by the categories of the Enlightenment, that there are different ways of reasoning, and that the church must make its claims to truth on a contested field without shouting in advance that others are wrong and it alone is right.

Once all the disclaimers have been made — that many religious beliefs are supremely difficult to test for truth because they refer to the supernatural or to that which it is beyond our mental powers to discern, or because (in the case of faith) they are values and not truth - claims — once all this has been said, we still have to admit that yes, of course the question of truth enters in here.

If an atheist is claiming absolute truth, then he is making a religious claim, not a scientific one.

Makes sense that churches should try to be more culturally relevant to attract new parishioners, of course this does nt make their truth claims any more believable.

At the extreme, religious groups claiming the sole way to truth make common cause with fascist politics.

It is out of the question to try to grasp God through sight (which is the equivalent of reducing truth to reality), to claim that what one sees can be God (in this case one converts reality into truth), or to make a representation of something in the spiritual realm (which is the same as consecrating a religion, since religions always belong to the visual realm).

When pressed about the unfairness of disqualifying their opponents a priori, naturalists sometimes portray themselves as merely insisting upon a proper definition of «science,» and not as making any absolute claims about «truth.»

One has to be hindu atheist, ignorant self centered to make a claim such as yours, TRUTH ABSOLUTE IS GOD Of ABRAHAM, AND HE RULES THE UNIVERSE, such as disrupt your breath and be able to live.

I just feel the need, from time to time, to point out to you and other believers, as they make truth claims, that I think they are actually faith claims.

The Catholic Church is the only Church that can historically, traditionally and logically make the claim to teach Christian Truth - which is why CNN wants to hate it out of existence.