In prose that is not simply accessible but also beautiful and electric, Ackerman distills the hard, objective
truths of science in order to yield vivid, anecdotal explanations about a range of existential questions regarding consciousness and the nature of identity.
Sociology: Auguste Comte, the founder of sociology, claimed that the religious phase of history had ended, replaced by the
higher truths of science.
You said «By believing in God, you are not denying
the truths of science.»
By believing in God, you are not denying
the truths of science.
Believing in creation by God is not denyng
the truth of science.
It is important that as informed Catholics we take note of scientific discoveries, yet as Catholics we believe that
the truths of science can never be in contradiction to the author of those truths, namely God.
When we limit our knowledge strictly to the Bible and refuse to listen to — or dialogue with — others, we're rejecting
the truth of science, logic, experience and the wonderful wisdom of others.
At its best, the Catholic tradition has been a tradition of curiosity, of openness, of reason, of looking difficult questions squarely in the face, confident in the knowledge that
the truth of science not only can not contradict the truth of Catholic Christianity, but will actually beautifully complement the Christian revelation.
Essentially, though, there are two challenges: 1) How do we teach science to children when
the truth of that science provides incontrovertible evidence that their parents who reject it are idiots?
The ignoring of the effect of the aerosols by Victor shows a complete lack of interest in understanding
the truth of the science or a purposeful desire to deflect reality.
That's seems like a common tactic from those who want to avoid
the truth of the science.]