Not exact matches
A sweeping new study published in the journal
Science has found that false or misleading stories spread faster and farther
than the
truth on social media.
But it is much, much more logical to use
science to try and find out why we are here
than just settling for whatever holy book it is you worship as
truth and leaving it at that.
Science may never meet God, but the intelligent scientists are the ones who will find the
truth sooner
than others.
In
truth Intelligent Design is really nothing more
than a Relgious Belief given the cloak of
Science, but from a Scientific perspective it is only a Hypothosis at best.
There is not one shred of
truth from
science to account for the presence of life upon the earth by any means other
than a special creation by the great original first Cause - God - Who is life and the fountain source of all life!
The sad
truth is... atheists have no more of a chance to prove their belief with
science than those that have faith in God.
Science - fictional adventures in an imaginary future, among extraterrestrial intelligences or future versions of humanity, are — obviously — not accurate predictions of our future, but have more
truth in them
than to suppose our current social and biological order is unchanging.
Sometimes these imperfect human beings find things like arts and literature that explain the
truth of what is to be human better
than science and history.
On the other hand, there is in the history of
science more continuity
than one would expect from Feyerabend or from Kuhn's earlier work, in which
truth is entirely relative to a succession of self - contained language systems dominated by diverse paradigms.
Real Christians Hate Religion... Real Christians Hate Hypocrites... Real Christians should be more like Christ... How could you claim to be a Christian if you don't even know your Christ... The reason why doomed people would never understand Christ is because they never tried to search for the
Truth... They only listen to such rubbish things rather
than the
Truth... Read and do more and Talk less... It doesn't take a genius to know that Someone created you rather
than you coming to life with just atoms randomly hitting each other... If you're really smart, think about it... Stop the non-sense talk about God and
Science and find it out for yourself...
Now why not youngsters that attracted to
science research and study the locked verses in all known holy books in to one: - One Master Christian holy book - One Master Judos holy book Then both studied and revised with the Holy Quran finding real differences and work out to solve it finding the
truth for the sake of
truth only through the use of
science that they speak of rather
than worshiping it?!
Furthermore, Thomas assures us that the principles of this sacred
science are more certain
than any human
science, since they derive their certitude from the light of divine
truth, not from the insight of a particular theologian.
Finally, the credibility of
science itself has been shown — once again, and as if we needed a reminder — to be subject to such ordinary human failings as ego defense, the willingness to bend the
truth rather
than admit error, and the temptation to disparage and insult one's opponents.
The Need for a New Synthesis: A traditional Idea It is not surprising that
science gets at the
truth about the world, for fundamentally
science is nothing other
than sophisticated observation of the cosmos.
Hopefully
science leads to
truth rather
than profit or it isn't worth the effort of calculations in the long run cause a man can't survive the eye of a hurricane.
Website blacklists, storage of all your emails by intelligence services and routine monitoring of your internet connection may sound like something from a
science fiction novel — or an authoritarian regime — but the
truth may be stranger
than fiction for Britain in 2012.
«This missing
science of heredity... is, in simple
truth, ten times more important to humanity
than all the chemistry and physics, all the technical and industrial
science that ever has been or ever will be discovered,» wrote H. G. Wells in 1903.
I also have friends here at U.C. Davis doing similar kinds of work at the Center for
Science and Innovation Studies, studying economics as a political power system rather
than an immutable
truth.
In versions of manuscripts for another project submitted to Cognition,
Science, and Nature, Hauser claimed that «16 out of 16 subjects» responded more to poor grammar
than correct grammar, when in
truth 13 monkeys had responded to a greater degree.
A moral story that praises a character's honesty is more effective at getting young children to tell the
truth than a story that emphasizes the negative repercussions of lying, according to research published in Psychological
Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological
Science.
If anyone can discover the
truth by using reason and
science, Jefferson reasoned, then no one is naturally closer to the
truth than anyone else.
And
science, rather
than pumping us full of
truths, encourages us to keep looking.
He also maintains that Western
science is more
than simply Western, because it is universal, but this is precisely the claim which conservatives have made a point of rejecting: they do not see a tradition so obviously tied to the history of the West as a system of objective, neutral or universal
truth.
Truthful tweets took six times as long as fake ones to spread to 1500 people across Twitter — in large part because falsehoods were 70 per cent more likely to be retweeted
than the
truth, even after accounting for the posters» account age, activity level and number of followers (
Science, doi.org/gc3jt6).
She was created for a purpose so revolutionary, someone was willing to kill for it.Seventeen - year - old Lexi Matthews keeps two secrets from her elite boarding school classmates she s the daughter of a famous and controversial geneticist, and she can influence people s thoughts.But after new student Jack DeWeese heals her broken arm with an anything - but - simple touch, he forces Lexi to face a new reality her abilities reach much further
than speaking to the minds of others.After Lexi s father goes missing and she receives threatening emails, she can t decide whether to fall into Jack s arms or run and hide.As Lexi seeks answers to what she and Jack are, she discovers a
truth more unsettling
than anything her
science books can teach.
A pervasive curiosity, an objective tolerance that finds all shades of opinion interesting and respectable as long as they do not interfere with liberty of inquiry and belief, a systematic pursuit of
truth in spite of traditions and doubts — these, much more
than a taste for sentimental botany and rhapsodical astronomy, were the product of the five years or so that Voltaire spent in active pursuit of
science at Cirey with Madame du Châtelet; like his heroes, he has learned from
science, and achieved in his own way a synthesis, quite different from that of the seventeenth century.
Suddenly, we seem to live in a time dominated by «fake news», «alternative facts», conspiracy theories, scepticism of scientific research, partial accounts parading as «the real
truth which has hitherto been concealed from us, the people», revolts against allegedly smug academic elites and distant political elites — a time where YouTube videos claiming research into climate change to be a scam get far more viewers
than videos presenting the
science of climate change.
The festival will take a closer look at the issues of climate change and our future relationship with the changing landscape, while also examining the language surrounding future projections that are more akin to works of
science fiction
than empirical
truth.
My problem with these attempts to convince / influence people by appealing to something other
than the actual
science is that they tend to work equally well both ways, whereas sticking to the rules of
science really does tend to favor the
truth.
While the
Science Report item is humor, I'm sure you detect more
than a hint of
truth in it.
Andy Revkin, please for the love of all that is that is ethical and moral, do you job and report on the
science and the
truth rather
than making straw men arguments, and stop cow towing to the likes of Nigel Persaud.
May would no doubt argue that these shifting allegiances reflect no more
than the «
truth» of «the
science» on offer from Greenpeace et al regarding these various areas.
Of course, «the
truth,» according to Inhofe, is that climate change is a myth: «The
science is still out on what effect CO2 might have in terms of what they call global warming and the
science is more on our side
than on their side.»
So rather
than abusing me personally for advocating this principle — that personal abuse being a sad waste of energy and time — perhaps more folks (including Anthony Watts) ought to reflect upon the principle «Be First with the
Truth» itself, and then contribute responsible comments upon the broad span of duties that this principle devolves upon America's citizens (both
science - minded and skeptic - minded).
When you've got an educational system that is weak in teaching
science, myths are going to win out over
truth more often
than not.
Nothing could be more appropriate today
than to quote the world leading researcher J.R. Christy, who in an article in Nature (vol 463, p. 732) summarizes his views on climate
science's current level: «The
truth, and this is frustrating for policy makers, is that scientists» ignorance of the climate system is enormous ``.
Filed under Climate Alarmism, Climate Change, Climate Disruption, Co2 Insanity, Global Warming, Government, NASA, NOAA, Politics, Sattelitegate,
Science,
Truth Stranger
than Fiction
C02 is a contributing factor, the
truth is a bit less certain
than the
science has published.
Sadly, the burden invariably falls to that small group of maverick believers in free markets and honest
science who don't care about all the brickbats they get for being defenders of «dirty fuel» because they'd rather speak the
truth than be popular.
Yet these terms point to something that is more important
than many scientists seem to realise — that there are innate problems with the ideas of «
truth» and «evidence» that may be difficult for
science to deal with.
Standards of
truth and objectivity are higher at the Sun or the Daily Mail
than at Psychological
Science or at Frontiers in Personality
Science.
When such an assumption may not be made the math and
science are worse
than worthless because they mask the
truth.
This seems to be more about SteveM's desire to fight and to bolster his ego and self importance
than get to the
truth, and is most definitely not about advancing the
science.
The result, therefore, is more of a self - justifying (because it abrogates power to the UNs well - paid bureacracy) scam
than a neutral,
truth - seeking,
science focused project.
The problem isn't the
science, it is
science becoming politised and kidnapped by those who seek their own glory rather
than the
truth.
From a legal perspective, it's slightly more nuanced
than you have stated — the issue is not simply whether Steyn has defamed Mann, but whether he either knew what he said was untrue or showed a wilful disregard for the
truth (at least on the assumption that Mann counts as a public figure on the subject of climate
science in Law).
Anybody who cares about
truth, reality
science and scientific integrity more
than stroking their own confirmation bias.
We can only hope that this industrial scale corruption of
science will eventually end and scientists will return to the task of finding the
truth, rather
than trying to scare us into submission.
The current situation for the climate
sciences has been described as «a struggle about the
truth of the state of climate» (Romm 2010), and a number of books even claim that climate
science myths have been introduced to society in a distorted way, causing more confusion
than enlightenment (Oreskes and Conway 2008; Gelbspan 1997; Hoggan et al. 2009; Mooney 2006).
This is not too hard to understand because
science is geared to regressing to the
truth, even more so
than the ad hoc wisdom of crowds approaches do.