Sentences with phrase «try speaking from»

We need to try hearing with our hearts, try speaking from our hearts.

Not exact matches

From left, Rep. Gerry Connolly, D - Va., speaks with a Customs and Border Patrol liaison on the phone as he along with Rep. Don Beyer, D - Va., and Rep. Jamie Raskin, D - Md., try to determine if any international travelers are detained without legal access at Dulles International Airport in Virginia.

Don't ever try to connect with a session speaker after they've just spoken, because you'll be in a group with all the other people from that session.

Along the way, Silas tried to separate himself from his father, coaching at pre-draft camps, participating in Basketball Without Borders, and speaking at clinics — anything to make his own name.

To avoid making costly mistakes (and I'm speaking from experience), here's what we try to do at my company, Lolly Wolly Doodle:

«While trying to extract information from (Apple) management is like squeezing «water from a rock,» we did speak with AAPL CFO (Peter Oppenheimer)... and found the conversation helpful,» ISI analyst Brian Marshall in a note to clients a few weeks ago.

«We are speaking up now because we are disappointed and frustrated; we feel we have hit a dead end in trying to influence the company quietly from the inside,» the Kapors wrote.

In speaking with you, he or she will also try to understand where you're coming from, which can make all the difference.

He aggressively deflected attention from himself, speaking rarely to the press and then typically at the request of a CEO he was trying to help.

According to several music executives, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the talks are private, Apple recently tried but failed to persuade record labels to agree to lower licensing costs that would have let Apple sell subscriptions to its streaming service for $ 8 a month — a discount from the $ 10 that has become standard for services like Spotify, Rhapsody and Rdio.

After the backlash, Trump issued a rare conciliatory statement and spoke to Panamanian press, insisting that he was simply criticizing the negotiating abilities of American politicians and that «if I were from Panama, I'd try and make the same kind of a deal, I respect that.»

The second verse speaks from the perspective of the mother, who is trying desperately to escape an impossible and deadly situation.

your claim of «they change the definition» tries to under - cut the argument itself «at the knees» so to speak... but let me remind you that you changed your self - definition from drunk and unsaved to «drunk with the new wine» and saved (get the Acts reference, i'm kinda proud of that one; — RRB --RRB- things change and when we know better we do better.

So, by your reasoning, if «People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit) speak for themselves.

Part of you is still reeling from the revelation and trying to reconcile the fact that a man who you respect (ed), who taught about things like integrity and honesty, was apparently more able to speak those truths than live them out.

A professor at a major Catholic institution where I used to speak from time to time when I was a Lutheran recently said that he had tried and failed to have me invited for a lectureship.

Or, you can try celibacy along with staying away from male heathens who speak out id both sides of their mouths, never to take responsibility for their thoughts / beliefs, words or actions as they move on down the road to their next victim as soon as the previous one got pregnant.

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

What is possible for us is to take seriously what is said by those who speak from the side of oppressed groups, to do what we can to make sure their voices are heard, and to try to adjust our own living and thinking to make them more appropriate to what we have learned.

The decisive and constantly repeated act of man is to separate this word from the one who speaks it and to try to make it his own.

To try to talk of what is human in separation from the rest of nature and God is to speak of an abstraction.

You say you don't know gods will because to try and think like god is too hard (which for the record I think is a cop out in any debate or discussion about god that I understand you really believe it and are not trying to duck around a question, but to say I don't know, god is too powerful to understand sort of halts discussion from there) but you also are saying to speak with him on a daily basis.

Preachers must be aware of the diversity of persons in their congregation, yet try to speak so that the Spirit, through scripture, addresses many hearts in ways that will be fitting to each, as different as these hearers are known to be from one another.

Which is why I chose to not speak from a personal perspective but from one that is trying to observe and understand the vastly opposing responses.

Early on, having admitted the difficulty of speaking of ultimate mystery at all, he adds, «This does not mean that it is not worth saying, that it is just empty talk... I do have some things to say, but... I want it understood from the outset how problematic all of this is, how uncertain; but however uncertain, these are matters worth attending to, worth trying to understand as well as we can.»

I have tried to read books and internet to get some clarification of the bible, I think well this person would be good to learn from because they are so knowledgeable about the Bible and then they speak about faith and works and I get so confused all over again.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

i'm not trying to say this IS THE WAY IT IS i am only speaking from my understanding and since my wife and i discuss EVERYTHING down to the nitty gritty i can't imagine there is much from the experience i am lacking — but again, this was only one persons opinion of something that effects many.

These are the inevitable consequences of Jesus» Sonship, as is recognised by the evil spirits, but Jesus does not suffer the spirits to speak and tries as far as possible to prevent news of his healings from spreading abroad.

I've realized that people are more moved when I speak from my heart, from a place of unshakable faith about an unfailing personal Savior than when I try to rely on solely my intellect or how well I can communicate my ideas.

I wasn't trying to write a manifesto or speak for a generation or exhaustively examine the causes of declining church attendance among twenty - something; just speak from experience with some surveys for support.

Some like John Jay tried all at once the strategies of ignoring, overwhelming and inventing when he claimed that the emerging republic was «one connected country» and «one united people — a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in manners and customs.»

And — speaking of heroics — an Iraqi doctor tried to deliver her to an American compound two days before the rescue effort, only to be driven away by gunfire from U.S. soldiers who apparently feared an ambulance bomb.

Nor is it possible, for reasons which must be dealt with in a moment, to try to separate the orienting term from the tendency as if it were purely external and merely as a matter of fact the goal to which the tendency moves, but only in virtue of an independent impulse in the latter not intrinsically dependent on the term but simply belonging objectively speaking to finite spirit as such.

Try to extract it from the words recorded in the Synoptic Gospels as spoken by him, and nearly everything else goes with it.

The big difference between this kind of vision and the kind of vision you speak against (quite rightly IMO) is that it is not one you are trying to impose on the church, nor is it seeking an essential change, but it is still a change you are urging, and the urging changes it from reporting to visionary.

Throughout the course of the events in Ferguson I have tried to seek insight from friends who can speak to this issue in ways I can not, and have dealt with this struggle in ways that I have not.

In a parable immediately following this exchange, Jesus speaks of those who try to come to the marriage feast, but are told: «Depart from me, all you workers of iniquity.

We ought to try simply to understand what the first Christians meant when they spoke of Christ as being the «first - born from the dead».

They spoke of Jesus like one speaks of an intimate friend or lover, as if they had just returned from a long walk by his side, their faces still flush from the movement, their breathing still labored from trying to keep up.

That is obvious in a broad and vague way when we consider some of the various ways in which we speak of trying (and often failing) to understand: We speak of hoping to understand the instruction manual that accompanies a new word processor and of trying to understand a novel like James Joyce's Ulysses; though both are printed texts, what it is to understand one is quite different from what it is to understand the other.

Furthermore, he violated the consti.tution by speaking about political issues and trying to inadvertently sway the vote away from Obama, for which once the IRS are done he could very well have cost his cult of bigots their tax - exempt status.

Jeff: This is what causes division as we go about doing even good things, out of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil to set up another sect out of our carnal nature; above is the outcome; Jesus came to cause division among men that tries to become their own god and sets up camp, even for them that call themselves Christian, for them that have went from Him and His Words, even that are not of His Spirit: Jesus said; the Words that I speak are Spirit and Life, That means the Words of man can only bring forth death: Therefore; if we do not have His Spirit in us, then we too can only speak forth death: This is what it is to be a believer, we truly believe our Lord: I can see what the Catholic church and her daughters are doing to form a religious Babylonian city: Even as God caused a division in Babylon in the past because the peoples became great, so to is it now with all of the man made sects of religion: But when we are filled with the Spirit of God then we can not help but to live for God: It is written; those who are led by His spirit are His children: Thank - you Jeff: Those who are of His Spirit will know these truths, those who are not of His Spirit truly believe a believer is as they and can not know what we speak, because they live in unbelief: Thank - you again Jeff; In Jesus Name Alexandria: P.S..

Jeremiah 10 they nail their IDOL down like a scarecrow it can't move can»... t speak can't move must be carried these are nothing but the WORK of CON men.john 10 jesus christ sais his sheep hear his voice and another voice thy will not follow and if another person tries to preach to them they WILL FLEE from him.

The cartoon from earlier today was inspired by something I read years ago that I've tried to apply ever since, and that is that I should only speak or teach what I actually believe or know to be true.

The cartoon from earlier today was inspired by something I read years ago that I've tried to apply ever since, and that is that I should only speak or teach what I actually believe...

Perhaps she would speak of impossible expectations and all the time she's wasted trying to contort herself into the shape of those amorphous silhouettes that flit from magazines and billboards into her mind.

I try not to put too much pressure on myself to speak up as the token «Christian feminist» on issues like these, but after reading multiple blog posts and articles this week from Christian men about women and contraception, I decided to add my two cents as a pro-life woman of faith who supports affordable access to birth control for women.

In my own opinion, «understanding» would be a much better translation and, in the sense that you seem to speak, fulfills the need for our attaining it via some valid manifestation presented us by God, Himself, not just an individual trying to convince us he has had a revelation from the Almighty.

A big book that tries to take on the whole shebang, so to speak, from the very beginning up to this morning's newspaper.