Not exact matches
Google's aim is partly to convince people to
turn off their own
ad - blocking software, which costs publishers revenue by preventing
ads from displaying.
(My best friend
from high school Jennie could attest to that - Sometimes I couldn't
turn it
off:p) You saw that in Robin Williams in «Good Morning Vietnam» in «Mrs. Doubtfire» and how he
ad libbed in Aladdin.
I think the sign
off from CRA above says it all... Just like when you read a voter ballot on propositions, I go straight to the source of who is behind the voice, and CRA consistently has used this «trace» argument time and again, just like the chem companies do with the lead in lipstick (I just attended the Teens
Turning Green national summit, and found the debriefing almost verbatim to the CRA «counterpoint» above... it's only a «little» lead, not enough to... blahdeblah, times «x» amounts of applications per day times «x» amounts of other products with «trace» amounts,
ad infinitum...)
Not sure if it's because I already have AdBlock on (oddly, a few days ago «a message
from the creator of AdBlock» suddenly popped up on while I was opening a new tab proposing me to
turn it
off, of course I didn't), but I haven't seen
ads, and even if I saw them, I wouldn't click them, simply because I don't care about them.
[there are countless examples of unmitigated BS
from the pro-AGW industry: for just two instances, take climateprediction.net's scaremongering last year on 11C temperature increases, or Tim Flannery's recent taxpayer - funded
ads in South Australia claiming
turning off your lights will ease global warming].
Turning off interest - based
ads prevents
ad networks
from building up a profile on what you like and what you don't, based on your viewing, reading, or other habits.
Finally, go the
Ads section of Facebook and
turn off Facebook's ability to collect data about you
from the other websites you visit.