Not exact matches
Shen says, «This could have great applications in energy, and especially in solar thermophotovoltaics» — harnessing solar energy by using it to
heat a material, which in
turn radiates light of a particular color.
Each person in a building
radiates a given amount of
heat, which in
turn requires a certain amount of cooling to keep in check.
Exposing the nanoparticles to a low - frequency electromagnetic field causes them to
radiate heat that, in
turn, erases the tethers and releases the drugs.
The Sun's thermal energy reaching us is the same
heat we feel from a fire
radiating its thermal energy to us; we can be in a cold room and our backs cold, but our fronts
heating up nicely so we
turn around and toast the other side..
Unless you are going to deny the earth
heats the sun at all, then it makes no difference HOW the sun
heats the earth, the result is the still the same — the earth then
radiates all / some of this
heat, which
heats greenhouse gasses, which in
turn return some of this
heat to the earth.
But if a little more energy is absorbed, then CO2 is acting like a little black soot in the atmosphere and it will, in
turn,
radiate more toward space as a black box would from the added
heat and this might compensate for the change in albedo.
which in
turn means more evaporation, which in
turn creates more clouds trapping the
heat allowing less
heat to be
radiated off into space
The tired old alarmist argument goes something like this: CO2 levels increase, which in
turn increases temperature, which in
turn means more evaporation, which in
turn creates more clouds trapping the
heat allowing less
heat to be
radiated off into space.
Since to me (and many scientists, although some wanted a lot more corroborative evidence, which they've also gotten) it makes absolutely no sense to presume that the earth would just go about its merry way and keep the climate nice and relatively stable for us (though this rare actual climate scientist pseudo skeptic seems to think it would, based upon some non scientific belief — see second half of this piece), when the earth changes climate easily as it is, climate is ultimately an expression of energy, it is stabilized (right now) by the oceans and ice sheets, and increasing the number of long term thermal radiation /
heat energy absorbing and re
radiating molecules to levels not seen on earth in several million years would add an enormous influx of energy to the lower atmosphere earth system, which would mildly warm the air and increasingly transfer energy to the earth over time, which in
turn would start to alter those stabilizing systems (and which, with increasing ocean energy retention and accelerating polar ice sheet melting at both ends of the globe, is exactly what we've been seeing) and start to reinforce the same process until a new stases would be reached well after the atmospheric levels of ghg has stabilized.
The creation directly of Thermal IR
heating to land and sea in raising the temperature of the Earth which then
radiates out x amount of Thermal IR, and, the creation of
heat from Life itself as it uses these different energies, including the Solar of the cartoon, to convert to chemical and mechanical uses which enable Life to flourish and in
turn radiate out Thermal IR.
That molecule can in
turn radiate IR, but can not transfer
heat to a warmer earth.