yes it does say to
turn the other cheek in the bible, but you're using it out of context.
It seems as if the act of
turning the other cheek in the face of controversy or challenge has become a thing of the past.
What does the Lord's injunction to
turn the other cheek in Matthew 5:39 require when it comes to ecumenical dialogue?
East Gallery:
Turn the Other Cheek In this exhibition of new figurative work, Cathy Daley deals with the theme of communication and the effect of subjectivity on relationships and understanding.
Not exact matches
Maybe I could promise them some future reward for being docile... for
turning the
other cheek... Even better; what if I could convince them that they could endure suffering
in this world because it was meaningless?
Jesus
turned the
other cheek, but it seems that Christians
in America aren't too fond of doing so.
I feel like a lightweight
in the heavyweight division; this statement is not driven by a need to appear humble or to «earn points» with God or those longsuffering Christians still reading this thread by
turning the
other cheek and being meek.
Bottom line, let's look at the Bible
in context (i.e. Jesus is God, same God who says
turn the
other cheek told the Israelites to kill every man, woman, and child
in Canaan) and let's use common sense while always trying to follow Biblical teachings.
The greatest love known is to give (or risk) your life for a friend - Jesus didn't say that the greatest love known is to «
turn the
other cheek and forsake a friend» - you recieved sacrifical love from a complete stranger and willfully chose to withhold your sacrificial love
in return.
Sure, if a driver flips you off on the freeway, it's a noble and wise thing to «
turn the
other cheek» - but if a mass murderer is alive and planning more carnage, it would be an insult to all that is good, right, and just
in the world to allow him to plan and execute further terrorist plots.
I refused even though my mom told me protect myself, because I had learned
in church, that Jesus my lord and savior said not to, that we should
turn the
other cheek.
Jesus could have left the moneychanges alone and prayed for them
in the Temple, but instead he whipped them,
turned over their tables (not his
other cheek), and then chased them away.
f The more original Biblical reference to retaliation was from the mythical character Jesus (invented by Constantine at the first council at Nicaea
in 325, and modeled after his own «prophet» the Sun God, Mithra, and named Jesus Christos to combine the Celtic God Hesus and the Indian God Krishna, whose Latin name was Christos, into one God) who said «
turn your
other cheek» (when struck
in the face).
As a non-believer
in any personal god I am not compelled to
turn the
other cheek, but give back as much or more dissing as I get and often do it first, why wait?
He shows how we Christians have terribly misunderstood and misapplied the words of Jesus
in Matthew 5:38 - 42 about
turning the
other cheek and walking the extra mile.
Jesus spent all of his ministry teaching you to treat your neighbor
in the same way that you would want to be treated; invited you to take notice of the plank
in your eye, not to cast the first stione, to
turn the
other cheek.
In the same vein, we rightly tell women they should not simply
turn the
other cheek when a man sexually assaults them.
It comes
in a barrage of equally hard sayings toward the end of the Sermon on the Mount, where Jesus tells his followers to
turn the
other cheek, give away your coat if someone sues you for your shirt, and «love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is
in heaven» (Matthew 5:44 - 45).
A final pastoral function is the reconciling one — i.e., restoring the basis for belief
in persons of faith despite their contradictory behavior; «
turning the
other cheek»
in anomalous situations.
Of course I also agree with ex-NY Mayor Koch who stated something like, I don't believe
in turning the
other cheek, I give back as much as I get.
In imitating God and His virtues, Rabbi Cordevero believes that humanity should desire to sustain love and «
turn the
other cheek» even to those «who do not deserve it at all.»
Thus,
in 1975 when Dr. Robb (then president of the «Good News» movement) leveled a blast at all the United Methodist seminaries, claiming that
in none of them could an evangelical student hope for a decent exposure to the Wesleyan heritage, there were not many of us
in an
other -
cheek -
turning mood.
Practicing Christianity has for African - Americans meant
turning the
other cheek, walking
in humility, and enduring cruel and debasing treatment.
Jesus» commands are pretty clear —
turn the
other cheek, love enemies and forgive them, don't take revenge, etc, so it would seem that refusing to fight or support
in any way might be the thing christians should do, unless the war is clearly justified.
he did speak of «
turning the
other cheek, loving your enemies, he did admonish his disciple peter for using a sword on him, he did allow himself to be killed, he did chose to forigve»... i'm just now seeing anywhere
in the NT where followers of christ are called to kill??? please show me... please show me
in the the ten commandments where it instructs on killing... oh, it does say not to murder
Some of the most widely quoted sayings
in the Sermon on the Mount, and the ones most consistently violated, are the commands (Mt 5:38 - 42) to
turn the
other cheek, to give the cloak when deprived of the coat, to go two miles when compelled to go one, to refuse no request for a gift or a loan, to offer no resistance to an evil man, as recent translations read where the KJV says «resist not evil.»
This is like what has been said about
turning the
other cheek;
in fact it simply carries the same theme a little further.
Between,
in the body of the sermon, lie the sayings most characteristic of the real Jesus: those concerning love of enemies,
turning the
other cheek, giving the shirt off one's back, and forgiving debts.
While there are difficult verses (such as «eye for eye, tooth for tooth» and «
turn the
other cheek»),
in context, they do not contradict (with that case, Moses was setting up punishment
in court, while Jesus was telling how individuals should live).
In just that context he must renounce all use of force,
turn the
other cheek when affronted, and give his last garment to whoever asks for it.
I'm not sure it's possible to be a healthy, well - adjusted person and go around loving your enemies and giving without expecting anything
in return and
turning the
other cheek.
The prolem I've always had with organized religion is that at some point after all the «Do unto
others» «
Turn the
other cheek» «Help thy neighbor» they all say «Oh, by the way, do it our way or burn
in hell».
But
in Western culture, Bowman explains (echoing Nietzsche), primitive honor did battle for centuries with the Christ - ideal of inner virtue, humility, and
turning the
other cheek.
Ironic isn't it — the biggest mass murders
in history perpetrated by the most religious followers of a religion promoting
turning the
other cheek...
answer YOUR A LIBERIAL if i were a doctor and every monday i let people who did not have health insurence or money
in their pockets come to my office so i could heal them what am i?answer YOUR A BLEEDING HEART LIBERIAL if i let you hit me right up side of my head and all i did was to
turn my
other cheek to you what am i?
At the center of this final battle between good and evil is an action - hero - like Jesus, who is
in no mood to
turn the
other cheek.
Certainly it makes no difference whether the setting is a mountain or a plain, and after the Beatitudes there are only slight differences
in wording.3 Many familiar teachings are included here:
turn the
other cheek, go the second mile, be reconciled with your brother, lay up treasures
in heaven, judge not, and love your enemies — not just your friends, but your enemies!
Do you believe when Jesus said «
turn the
other cheek» he was referring to being constantly slapped down by your fellow believers — you know, the ones who are to be maturing and new creations
in Christ?
Because the Bible is
in the cultural stream: David and Goliath, healing the blind man, I was blind but now I see,
turn the
other cheek.
With
turning the
other cheek, my take (again rightly or wrongly) is
in the context of Roman occupation and it being an act of active resistance, using laws that exist against
in this case a Roman that would slap a Jew
in the face.
By
turning the
other cheek, it's not passive but
in the knowledge that a soldier would get into trouble if he slapped a second time.
One night I gave to the fourteen - year - olds
in my cabin a brief exposition of the Sermon on the Mount, including the injunction to «
turn the
other cheek.»
The heart of God is not so much reflected
in sunshine and rain as it is
in the cross, where God literally
turned the
other cheek to the enemies of goodness and justice.
Those who
in the face of violence, oppression, abuse and neglect continue to
turn the
other cheek, go the second mile and share possessions even with accusers are not really victims.
It means the end for the «kingdom of the gentiles,» although the kingdom of God will triumph not by «paying back the gentiles
in their own coin,» as Wright says, but by
turning the
other cheek and walking the second mile.
I grapple with «
turn the
other cheek»
in the latter context - it is a very fine line sometimes between saying: no this is not ok do not abuse me, and being abusive
in return.
Believers preach / believe
in tolerance and
turning the
other cheek.
Once - Reluctant said, on November 12th, 2009 at 10:13 pm It's good to see you can take the humour
in stride, and even
turn the
other cheek.
Loving your enemies puts you at a distinct disadvantage
in a competitive climate where they are likely to sock it to you if you
turn the
other cheek.
While Jesus» name won't appear on the ballot this fall, I imagine that every time I care for the poor, attempt to live more simply,
turn the
other cheek, and love my enemies, I'm casting a vote for Jesus, who will one day return to rule His Kingdom
in person.