Not exact matches
Unlike Marx and others who tried to
turn socialism into a
science and thought they knew what would happen, Rorty's religion is radically open to, adamantly insistent
upon, the new — making possible a life of «pure, joyous hope.»
For example — Often used by many christians as an arguement for intolerence towards human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to
turn this country into, where
science and logically thought are frowned
upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.
AA, religion, christ himself,
science satanisim, math, medicine or whatever it is you choose to
turn to try to get out of pain, remorse, guilt, anger, selfishness, legal problems, drug / alcohol abuse, financial ruin or any other negative result producing situation that you have brought
upon yourself if it changes you for the betterand helps others feel better about you or themselves who cares what, who, or how someones higher power works!!!
Prior to Galileo
science thought of Man as the mathematical and moral centre of a World composed of spheres
turning statically
upon themselves.
With devastating, scholarly detail, Jaki
turns the whole Enlightenment project of separating Christianity from
science upon its head.
From myths and folklore, to fairy tales, fantasy and
science fiction, people through every age and culture have
turned to storytelling to reflect
upon their lives.
Xenogears received critical acclaim
upon release, and the
turn - based action RPG had the perfect balance of
science fiction, spirituality, and psychology to bring the player a multi-layered plot and a satisfying RPG experience.
Should scientists appreciate that climate - change
science too, in the end, «
turns upon humble human affection»?
I do like the «no credibility» aspect of the comment, Adam, but the point is that so much public sentiment is based
upon commentaries just such as these — in fact, these particular articles where apparently very influential in
turning public opinion against climate
science — and now we are seeing retractions.
The purpose for which Brandon Gates posts in this forum is to offer a shred of plausibility — however tattered and insubstantial — to which the average climate catastrophe True Believer can
turn as he visits this forum, the better to strengthen the confirmation bias
upon which such cement - heads must necessarily rely as the alleged «
science» of their beloved fraud is firehosed away from under their feet.