Simply stated, this involves a natural - law -
type argument in which (quoting John Haldane) one advocates «that which ought to be, not merely that which happens to be.»
Not exact matches
«The
argument is the
types of things we're doing now with information technology just don't show up
in GDP because a lot of what we do on the Internet is free,» or very nearly so, says Philip Cross, a former chief of economic analysis at Statistics Canada who wrote a paper on the slow - growth economy for the Fraser Institute think tank last year.
In fact one could even make the
argument that the best trade for that
type of situation is a long gold / short gold stocks position, but we digress.
For some people $ 40,000 might be relatively little to risk
in exchange for that guarantee; or so the
argument in favor of these
types of «longevity» annuities goes.
Atheist are not bad people, bad people come
in all
types and ways, all smart people are not Atheist, so there is no
argument here.
«A straw man or straw person, also known
in the UK as an Aunt Sally, [1][2] is a
type of
argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.
Werner Jaeger, who has written the classic history of the idea of paideia, [2] pointed out
in a later book on Early Christianity and Greek Paideia that Clement not only uses literary forms and
types of
argument calculated to sway people formed by paideia but, beyond that, he explicitly praises paideia
in such a way as to make it clear that his entire epistle is to be taken «as an act of Christian education.»
To say that the claims that are based off of a book were created after the book was first written is just stupid (maybe your
argument isn't what you
typed and you made an error
in trying to convey your thoughts).
The final component
in Berger's
argument focuses on religion, which he identifies as a
type of symbolic universe.
However, as writers
in this group tend to suggest, that
type of
argument overlooks the fact that characterizations of the «essence» of Christian faith are themselves deeply shaped by the social and cultural locations of the people who make them.
Or maybe they can recognize the kinds of
arguments that do and do not reach people (especially academic
types)
in our science «soaked culture.
Flusser's statement seems closer to the truth than Buber's
arguments in his book Two
Types of Faith.
Thus «x» is any propositional function with individuals for its
arguments, «(x) x» means «there exists some individual
in the universal domain that has the property».4 At the lowest level
in the theory of
types there are individuals — a, b, c, d,... n, but the precise identification of the individuals is left open since the system of logic was only to be used as a foundation for pure mathematics.
Schleiermacher had an answer to these objections, and his successful
argument for including a theology faculty
in the University of Berlin added a second pole to the «Berlin»
type of excellent theological education: Theological education should be included as «professional» education.
This stringency seems to provide some grounds for the
type of probability - based anti-evolutionary
argument that Dawkins sets out to refute
in Climbing Mount Improbable, and provides some support for the
arguments Johnson makes
in Reason and the Balance concerning the unlikelihood of major evolutionary transitions occurring solely by Darwinian mechanisms.
Arguments can be had
in the safety of solitude, while
typing away on a phone or computer.
We have no idea that there might be other
types of life
in other parts of the universe or through a black hole into another universe that have very different narrow constrictions for environment that this
argument says is prime for us.
This
type of
argument is again broadly evidentiary
in nature, although it reflects not the «turn to the subject» characteristic of the appeal to individual experience, but rather a «pragmatic» or «linguistic» turn, as illustrated by Whitehead's observation that the evidence of human experience as shared by civilized intercommunication «is also diffused throughout the meanings of words and linguistic expressions» (cited
in TPT 74).12 Such an appeal is an essentially historical form of argumentation.
Furthermore, even the identification of the putative content of experience proves to be normed by whatever hermeneutical analysis is employed, for one can only imagine, much less recognize as present, what one can come to identify somehow.16 Finally, some hermeneutical analysis is also presupposed by and, therefore, normative of any
argument from experience, whether of the individual or the communal
type, since it is only experience as interpretable
in terms of some description or other to which one can ever appeal either for the mutual corroboration of such descriptions or for their illustration of a theistic interpretation.
The first general
type of
argument intended to lend credibility to such a description we can call the appeal to experience which,
in turn, can comprise an appeal either to individual experience or to communal experience (or to what we may equally well call the history of ideas).
Hasker next suggests that my position on the nature of intrinsic value is counter-intuitive by concluding — from my
argument that within the Hick1 - lasker
type of theism our enjoyment of freedom could be the same whether we had real or only apparent freedom (as Hick himself had said)-- that I would hold that falsely thinking one is loved and knows the truth is «just as valuable» as really knowing the truth and really being loved, so that these latter relations are «not of any worth
in themselves.»
To «The Bobinator»:
in your attempts to provide any
type of
argument against Trudy, you simply come across as mean and sarcastic.
Schillebeeckx would have a stronger
argument if there were an established cultural tradition of a specific
type of conversion experience such as can be found
in certain Christian denominations, particularly
in «evangelical» sects and
in the southern United States.
Many of the objections put forward by pro-life agencies
in Britain against recent euthanasia Bills gave precedence to the «thin end of the wedge»
type of
argument, often pointing to Holland as a worst case example.
I'd like to read some articles that mention lectins
in their
argument against the validity of the blood
type diet.
However, the club has spent on players; we can have an
argument about the
type and quality of players, but the fact remains we brought
in players and sold little, if any.
Point taken, but I'd argue that
in any corner of the internet where these
types of discussions are held quickly turn into some of the nastiest, most disingenuous
arguments held
in bad faith that you'll ever find online.
It would behoove us to keep this
in mind because the need to «win»
arguments is not conducive to happy marriages, positive family dynamics, or interpersonal relationships of any
type.
In fact, there is little hard evidence to suggest that, if the pregnancy is «high - risk», a negative outcome is more likely if a home birth is attempted, so there is an argument for including «high - risk» pregnancies in this type of analysis, and this was attempted as part of this research projec
In fact, there is little hard evidence to suggest that, if the pregnancy is «high - risk», a negative outcome is more likely if a home birth is attempted, so there is an
argument for including «high - risk» pregnancies
in this type of analysis, and this was attempted as part of this research projec
in this
type of analysis, and this was attempted as part of this research project.
I would vote for most PR systems
in a referendum, though (to complicate things) I think there is a good principled case for the
type of compromise package I advocate, beyond the «it could happen
in practice» pragmatic
argument.
It's also part of a broader problem,
in that politically - minded young people often seem instinctively uninterested
in JS Mill -
type arguments for free speech, and consider censorship questions as more about protecting certain groups from emotional pain than protecting individuals from those who would stop them participating
in debate.
Indeed the critical portrayal of republicanism as a system only suited to the small cities of ancient Greece bears some resemblance to the Leninist -
type argument that anarchism was a primitive form of socialism that had no place
in a revolutionary movement or a modern industrial economy.
As to the latter, to take an extreme case, if a new
type of government comes to power, and
in the course of it two drunks
in a bar have an
argument about whether the new government is better than the old and they throw a couple of punches, and that is the only violence, would you say that that means it failed the «no violence» test?
«When I was doing those TV debates it sometimes felt like I was up against a quasi-religious rock concert, where no matter what truth you told it didn't really matter
in a post-truth
type of
argument in the politics.»
To my lasting shame, I did not join
in the TV reporter's protest — nor did any of the dozen or so other media
types — even though I found Turco's
argument specious and his final say on the matter insulting.
Darrell Goodliffe would find a way to f**k up a coherent
argument if it popped
in through his window, handcuffed him to his computer chair, and
typed itself out
in full.
Your entire day is spent mostly
in front of the computer screen,
typing letters,
arguments, or applications.
Tina Hesman Saey covered researchers»
arguments for and against this
type of genetic engineering
in «Editing human germline cells debated» (SN: 5/30/15, p. 16).
«Obesity and
Type 2 diabetes
in children is on the rise and there is the
argument that it is related to lifestyle and availability of high calorie foods and reduced physical activity, but our study has found that maternal antidepressant use may also be a contributing factor to the obesity and diabetes epidemic,» said the study's senior investigator Alison Holloway, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at McMaster University.
Although the Copenhagen conference could have been criticized on many fronts, it is hard to imagine that Palin's remarkable statement represents anything other than a misplaced religious end - of - days
argument of the
type that asserts confidence
in human dominion over the earth — and that God will ensure the planet remains fine
in the face of human progress, until God decides to end it all and the worthy ascend to heaven.
Considering two different cluster ages (100 and 150 Myr), we selected cluster member candidates on the basis of their location
in the (I,I - z) CMD relative to the isochrones, and estimated the contamination by foreground late -
type field dwarfs using statistical
arguments, infrared photometry and low - resolution optical spectroscopy.
Still, the recent increase
in risks for women with this
type of history «is concerning and certainly presents an
argument for a more rigorous patient selection process, and strict management protocols,» he added.
If the people involved with these
types of articles would apply even a fraction of the effort - toward their own exercise program - that they do
in their «
argument» against exercise — imagine the shape they could be
in!!!
In order to do that, you of course are going to get some of the straw men
arguments and a lot of the critics that I've come across are the armchair nutritionist
types.
What's most stunning about the anecdotes recounted by Dick's interviewees is how alike they are, and if his film doesn't delve quite deeply enough into the
type of culture that breeds such conduct (specifically, the way
in which the army projects strength as a masculine trait, thereby subconsciously disparaging female victimhood as an undesirable weakness), its spartan use of graphics and statistics conveys
arguments with little grandstanding.
Learning opportunities that require this
type of evaluation process ask students to check for reliability, examine efficiency, monitor consistency, search for fallacies
in an
argument, or examine the probability of test results.
A lesson which develops source analysis understanding
in order to prepare students for GCSE
argument «How Far...»
type questions on when the Final Solution was developed.
But since flim - flam passes for evidence even
in serious intellectual magazines, like The Atlantic, we have to endure this
type of
argument.
Students can, without significant scaffolding, comprehend and evaluate complex texts across a range of
types and disciplines, and they can construct effective
arguments and convey intricate or multifaceted information... Students adapt their communication
in relation to audience, task, purpose, and discipline.
The practices represent different
types of expertise students should develop
in using math, from making sense of problems to reasoning abstractly and constructing viable
arguments.