Sentences with phrase «type of argument used»

it's the same type of argument used when buying a Chrome book or an iPad to write in.

This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it does influence the types of arguments used.

Not exact matches

Werner Jaeger, who has written the classic history of the idea of paideia, [2] pointed out in a later book on Early Christianity and Greek Paideia that Clement not only uses literary forms and types of argument calculated to sway people formed by paideia but, beyond that, he explicitly praises paideia in such a way as to make it clear that his entire epistle is to be taken «as an act of Christian education.»

What shocks me is that more Democrats aren't using this obvious argument to dismantle the bizarre coalition of fundamentalist Christians and neo-con business types.

Thus «x» is any propositional function with individuals for its arguments, «(x) x» means «there exists some individual in the universal domain that has the property».4 At the lowest level in the theory of types there are individuals — a, b, c, d,... n, but the precise identification of the individuals is left open since the system of logic was only to be used as a foundation for pure mathematics.

The basic argument of Bailey is that 1 Corinthians is composed of five major Prophetic Rhetorical Homilies, all of which use numerous types and formats of these Middle - Eastern thought structures.

This same type of argument was used against Nylander.

They use arguments and propaganda of exactly the same type and value but adjusted to politically correct 2011 terms.

«Obesity and Type 2 diabetes in children is on the rise and there is the argument that it is related to lifestyle and availability of high calorie foods and reduced physical activity, but our study has found that maternal antidepressant use may also be a contributing factor to the obesity and diabetes epidemic,» said the study's senior investigator Alison Holloway, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at McMaster University.

Considering two different cluster ages (100 and 150 Myr), we selected cluster member candidates on the basis of their location in the (I,I - z) CMD relative to the isochrones, and estimated the contamination by foreground late - type field dwarfs using statistical arguments, infrared photometry and low - resolution optical spectroscopy.

What's most stunning about the anecdotes recounted by Dick's interviewees is how alike they are, and if his film doesn't delve quite deeply enough into the type of culture that breeds such conduct (specifically, the way in which the army projects strength as a masculine trait, thereby subconsciously disparaging female victimhood as an undesirable weakness), its spartan use of graphics and statistics conveys arguments with little grandstanding.

THEN there are 5 types or styles of argument you can use.

A variety of activities used to teach the problem of evil including: taboo cards as a revision activity, a worksheet about the types of evil, two information sheets which students read and come up with their own definitions of natural and moral evil and finally a card sort and template which pupils use to construct the argument.

Ed Myths was a response to that type of policy argument and an attempt to demonstrate how systematic evidence could be used to inform policy - making.

The practices represent different types of expertise students should develop in using math, from making sense of problems to reasoning abstractly and constructing viable arguments.

These tasks can include anything from: group work / conflict resolution sessions; having students undertake learning style and personal learning activities so that they understand their strengths / weaknesses in a group; using ICT tools to support collaboration (e.g. Google Drive or edmodo); explicit teaching of problem solving and critical thinking (argument mapping, pro / con activities, logic and reasoning tasks), peer and self - evaluation in group work; small group dynamic activities that require students to solve small problems collaboratively (and mirror the types of open ended questions and problems encountered in other subjects e.g. maths, humanities, English, science).

They are versatile enough to be used for any type of texts / resource that could be presented but also witty enough to be engaging and present a clear line of argument (exactly what is required to enter the top bands).

Learn what the research says about how to develop expertise in this genre of writing — building an understanding of (persuasive) schema; developing stronger writing prompts for the 3 argument types (fact - based, judgment - based, policy - based); and teaching students how to find and use the most relevant evidence (text, data, etc.) needed to support each argument / opinion type.

I think the «professionals» that do the test drives are so diluted with the massive range of cars trucks SUV's etc that they drive they loose the ability to fine tune what matters to the specific group of people into this type of car... Also there is a lot of room in the front seat - seems to have endless adjustment to it - I am a huge guy 6» 3 and 250 pounds and just to feel like the Santa fe I have to have the seat upwards, I will slowly adjust this back as I get used to the car... Also no one wants to discuss the arguments about the 19 inch wheels adding a little to the ground clearance - an engineer showed me this huge equation that in the end said it added 1.45 inches... who knows... But I am impressed with the power, I thought it was slightly bigger and more powerful that the CX - 5 and handled just as good maybe better off regular roads....

Perhaps the most compelling argument for using e-readers with autistic students, or students receiving any type of special education services, for that matter, is the cost.

Perhaps the most profound argument for the use of e-readers in this type of setting is the fact that the other students are not aware of what book their neighbors are reading, minimizing the embarrassment that may come from having to read a book well below the students grade level.

This is not surprising since, as you will see, the arguments and types of reasoning used to promote the BARF concept are also commonly used to defend other forms of alternative veterinary medicine.

That's the same weak argument that was first (ineffectively) used when PennHIP's initial statistics showed it was a far more accurate method of prediction than OFA - type v - d positioning.

But what in fact appears to happen is that the concerns at least of some of those worried about these types of actions, have led them to try and convince society by attacking the science of the majority of climate scientists and to use scientific arguments that on the whole are rather weak and unconvincing, and nearly always involve the cherry - picking of data.

On the question of hurricanes, the theoretical arguments that more energy and water vapor in the atmosphere should lead to stronger storms are really sound (after all, storm intensity increases going from pole toward equator), but determining precisely how human influences (so including GHGs [greenhouse gases] and aerosols, and land cover change) should be changing hurricanes in a system where there are natural external (solar and volcanoes) and internal (e.g., ENSO, NAO [El Nino - Southern Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation]-RRB- influences is quite problematic — our climate models are just not good enough yet to carry out the types of sensitivity tests that have been done using limited area hurricane models run for relatively short times.

I think the people that only use the three types of arguments you describe are either not scientists, or are not reasonable scientists.

An argument that the wrong inference is drawn from the numbers, or the wrong type of numbers are being used to make decisions isn't a good argument that too much faith is placed in figures.

There used to be a few more «liberals» or «realists» who employed that type of argument here — but the are pretty much non-existent at this point.

This has nothing to do with the increase in mass of about 30 % over the past 150 years, although this type of calculation is used as argument that the anthro CO2 is not the cause of the rise...

This is before the claimant can issue proceedings; Subject only to any delay caused by completion of the medical evidence the whole process can be concluded in two to three months; There will be a presumption of a paper hearing by the district judge if the claim can not be resolved between the parties using modified Pt 8 type proceedings; There will be fixed interim payments if the claim does not settle promptly; Contributory negligence arguments around seatbelt issues are to be determined by fixed deductions from damages.

However, as is also clear, the language used is not consistent giving room for argument of the type advanced before us as to what a juror might understand was prohibited.

The types of arguments you can use depends on the program.

According to Dr. Gottman's research, «Formalizing repair attempts by using these scripted phrases can help you defuse arguments in two ways: First, the formality of a script ensures that you will use the type of words that work well for putting on the brakes, and second, these phrases are like megaphones — they help ensure that you pay attention to a repair attempt when you're on the receiving end.»

Research of couples arguing shows that people just don't use intellectual, heady types of communication skills in the heat of an argument.