Sentences with phrase «type of romantic partner»

Dr. Susan Krauss Whitbourne writes in «Psychology Today» that a man who is securely attached and has a positive attitude toward women is the best type of romantic partner.

Not exact matches

im average guy who works hard like all types of activites i love being very romantic and intimate with my partner.

You're not alone — most people who are using online hookup apps have a picture in their mind of what body type they prefer, the hair color of the person they want to hook up with and the height of a romantic partner.

When it comes to romantic partners you are likely to have a certain type of personality you connect with easily or a particular look that you find hard to resist.

Some of us are just not the «romantic» types (and maybe our partners aren't either!).

In this type of relationship, often the sugar baby serves to be a romantic partner, while sometimes, she acts as the companion of her sugar daddie in his...

This type of stress arises from interactions that aren't overtly hostile at the start, but that impose an increasing burden and lead to confusion about how to respond: a controlling friend who texts all the time, another friend who spies on your photos or breaks into your inbox, a romantic partner who pressures you to send inappropriate selfies or give him access to your digital accounts.

Researchers have linked the type of relationship we have with our caregivers (secure versus insecure) to the sorts of relationships we are likely to have with later romantic partners; secure early relationships are conducive to later secure relationships.1 It is typical for adults in secure romantic relationships to indicate that they feel supported by their partners and that their partners are central to their happiness and well - being.2 Further, securely attached adult relationships are even associated with greater physical and psychological health.2

These types of dilemmas happen all the time and in many different domains in romantic relationships, like finance, chores, and sex.2 In such situations one or both partners will have to sacrifice their own self - interest for the other.

Generally, researchers break it down into two main types: sexual versus emotional.1 Sexual infidelity is the type of cheating most people think of when someone engages in physical sexual activity with someone who isn't one's romantic partner, without the partner's knowledge or consent.

A study1 recently published in the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships examined the link between guilt and forgiveness seeking across different types of relationships (e.g., friends, romantic partners, family).

On the one hand, partners who were friends first may have had similar backgrounds and opportunities to develop many other types of similarities (e.g., leisure pursuits) even prior to forming a romantic relationship.

People who engage in this type of therapy are often able to develop the skills necessary to adequately address any future circumstances that might otherwise result in conflict, whether this conflict occurs with a romantic partner, a family member, or a colleague.

Confiding in someone who could be a potential romantic partner rather than your spouse, is a type of infidelity.

Different types of violence can occur between adult partners in romantic (e.g., dating, cohabiting, married) relationships.

In order to test these hypotheses, men and women from the University of Hawaii, who varied in love schemas, were asked to indicate their preferences for potential romantic partners who varied in physical attractiveness, body type, and love schemas.

An ambitious empirical study oh how biological temperament steers people toward a particular personality type as a romantic partner offers the prospect of unraveling one of the oldest human mysteries.

Regarding the sixth question, the analyses revealed that sibling types did not differ in the intensity of their emotional closeness to the romantic partner, F (2, 327) = 1.89, p =.15.

Perhaps the attachment to the romantic partner is equally strong independent of sibling type, and the predicted effects solely lie on the different rank of the sibling in the attachment hierarchy of the participants (attachment to the romantic partner MZ = DZ = NT).

Comparisons of the rank of the sibling and the romantic partner in the attachment hierarchy within each sibling type revealed in line with the third prediction that MZ twins placed the twin, mean rank = 1.42, SD = 0.76, significantly higher than the romantic partner, mean rank = 2.10, SD = 0.88, z = 4.59, p <.001.

Using this approach, we could straightforwardly compare the relative rank of the romantic partner with the rank of the sibling in the attachment hierarchy as a function of sibling type.

Finally, we investigated whether the attachment and the emotional closeness to the romantic partner suffer from the relationship to the sibling and were a function of sibling type as an open question.

This analysis revealed that the sibling types differed in the degree of their emotional closeness to their sibling and romantic partner, F (2, 326) = 25.96, p <.001, η2partial =.14.

Further, regarding the sixth question, the three sibling types also differed significantly in the assigned rank of their romantic partner, χ2 (2) = 47.18, p <.001.

This research examined the types of eating regulation goals that women have for themselves as well as for their romantic partner, and how these relate to their interpersonal style toward their partner, and to their partner's psychological and relational well - being.

This study compares the attachment to the romantic partner with the attachment to the sibling as a function of the participant's sibling type among monozygotic (MZ) twins, dizygotic (DZ) twins, and non-twin (NT) siblings.