Sentences with phrase «type of striker who»

Giroud is the Old fashion British Center forward type of striker who plays with his back to goal.

Not exact matches

This is exactly the type of versatile player that Arsenal need right now, as he can play as a winger or a striker, and anyone who can score 8 La Liga goals in 10 games (while not playing for Madrid or Barcelona) is definitely worth taking a chance on, especially for a price that works out at just over 14m GBP without any haggling.

For one thing he is a different type of player and gives Arsenal a completely different option up top, unlike Theo Walcott who maybe should be the player that Arsenal are looking to offload now that we have this new striker with pace and plenty of goals.

I have always liked Chicarito who I feel is a different type of striker to what we currently have.

Wenger likes certain types of strikers and the only time i recall him getting a player who is all about finishing is Jeffers, we know how that turned out... there was Suker & Eduardo too but they had something more also a high class of finishing ability especially Suker.

We need to understand that for our system to work we need a van persie kind of striker - a person who is as adept at scoring goals as in assisting, or may be I should say Sanchez type of striker.

The type of footballer who everyone wants on their team and no striker wants to come up against, Skrtel will take the ball and the man, rather than just the ball just to make a point to the opposition.

We do need a different type of striker, with pace and dribbling skill, who can get in behind opponent defence, and more clinical in front of goal.

Welbeck is the only forward we have who has most of the qualities that we would refer to as an Arsenal type striker, except for his finish which needs to be work on in the summer.

Secondly Nolito is more of a wingman than a striker and although we don't have too many recognised wingers at the club, especially not to a high standard of ability, we should be focusing less on another midfield type player and instead be targeting a player who will be a regular upfront and be able to deliver to the high standards in front of goal that we expect.

Thats why i think we need a different type of striker in our squad who has that kind of quality.

Welbeck who actually have the attributes of arsenal type striker is not a quality finisher, he could have been in double figures if he actually finish the chances created for him the past season with so few games.

Giroud is the type of player who needs those crosses, and he excels with another striker next to him (just look at him and Griezzman).

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

whatever you think of ramsey... and in my books he is a decent b2b but certainly not top class... he is not going to control the area between edge of box and centre line which is what all great DMs do... nor has coquelin proved that to me... he is a guttusso type player and has improved massively in that role... not convinced it is what will take us to challenging for titles however which is why a cavalho type DM is a needed addition especially as arteta and flamini are obviously not up to the task... but have always said that wengers job is to get best out of ozil santi and wilshere who are the real creative world class strengths of this squad... they need protection behind them and options in front... at moment the real worry is that wenger will continue to use mertesakher at CB and fail to bring in quality striker... so the song remains the same... without quality DM and attacking option we will be trying to retain 3rd place and reach qf of cl

After all there can be no doubting that Tottenham now have a fantastic squad and a great manager who should help them make a dent on the top six whereas work at pushing Newcastle United up the ladder is still ongoing however i do think this is just crazy paper talk, i am not sure he is the type of striker Ramos is looking for and it appears to be a deal Tottenham aren't even considering so the Sunday Express (Where this story appears to have originated from) probably made up the story in the first place!

We need a new striker of the type who can not only provided support for the other attackers, but who can score and add his own dynamic runs to the attack.

cavani probably wont happen not wenger type of striker (wont play on the wings, non flexible non starter for wenger) like unless some one else said on here if it was on our terms and price (or if the big russian was willing to make a one off donation to cover all expenses then maybe also while we use the rest of funds to get players we need) then and only then it would happen maybe the growing consensus is a d / m who covers at c / h (it would have been mbia for free if we got cavani how scary is that) and maybe one more marquee signing for a reasonable price i would bet my house on it (if i had one of course lol) if we were to offer bvb # 45 million for reus this week or at the start of next and offered him # 130,000 in wages he would be ours injury or not at 25 years old worth the risk every time.

I personally think that now is where the real genius of the formation kicks in, two ACMs who can be of different types along with three Forwards, only one of those have to be a striker.

So I think if we're buying a striker, it shouldn't necessarily be for the goals tally but because it provides us with a different option and a different type of player who can pose problems to defences that OG can't necessarily pose himself.

typical story when we end up with someone we did nt want to in the first place and deep in us we know he is not that type of player who we want... giroud is for me laughting stock, this guy is better but he is not henry we all know that... and i do nt know what is happening with wenger, did he truly belive that he is gonna lift trophy with girud, remy, sanogo upfront... others clubs strikers, costa - drogba, studridge - balloteli, jovetic - negredo - aguero - dzeko, rvp - rooney, lukaku - eto» o, soldado - adebayor, michu - w.

I think we need spain players with qualities, like Carzola for example... A player of Carzola's qualities can easily catch up with our game not like Olivier Giroud that is taking a lot of time to adapt to the premier league game, so if i should select the kind of players we should be having i'll go for 2 strikers which are Roberto Soldado of Valencia and Falcao who is out of our limit cos there're a lot of clubs on him in which we know Arsene wenger is not the type of Man that compete when it comes to buying quality players so what i suggest is that Mr wenger should go to Spain and pack as much as he can pack into the squad and let them all play Spain type of football similar to barcelona's style of play which everyone knows...

«You have many types of strikers and he is the one who is more of a combination player than a finisher.

United are in good form, with a new star striker in Robin Van Persie who loves to score in these types of fixtures.

If Simeone wants to stick with a 4 -4-2 formation and play another striker in place of Torres, then he has two options: either Ángel Correa, another Griezmann type of player who likes to move around the pitch, or Luciano Vietto, a more direct striker who is always near the goal.

Winger - cum - striker Walcott is something of a luxury lightweight, the type of player who regularly does well playing against West Ham rather than for them.