Sentences with phrase «types of entities which»

That is, a civilized society and a Society per se are equivalent types of entities which only vary to an unusual degree.

«5 Presented as one of eight derivative categories of existence the concept «nexus» denotes that type of entity which is brought into being as the relational complex of two or more actual entities grouped together into a composite whole.

That a Society has both essential and accidental qualities thus enables it to be a type of entity which endures throughout change as a «complete existence» with an ongoing historical development of its own: it remains what it is essentially and yet changes accidentally in «reaction to changing circumstances.»

He developed an understanding of another type of entity which combines order and life.22 He did so because he recognized that there is something like social order in the human soul and that this is combined with life and freedom.

Not exact matches

Two types of loan off - loading have to be distinghished: 1) off - loading of loans to an SIV (structured investment vehicle) which is an off balance sheet entity that is often sponsored by its creator - a private bank.

Without the two-fold reality which the relativity principle attaches to all completed occasions (and, more generally, to every entity of every type), the Category of the Ultimate, or principle of creativity — the most general principle presupposed by all the other categories of Whitehead's metaphysics (PR 31)-- would be an outright contradiction.

It is that, while Laszlo centers upon patterns of structure and relationship which are reiterated throughout the hierarchy of entities of the world, Whitehead focuses on a primordial type of entity, the actual occasion, whose basic processes are found only in its kind and not reiterated in larger arrangements such as nexus and societies.

Ford's theory of inclusive occasions places occasions within occasions; we, however, believe that there are two types of occasions, occasions which constitute space - time and occasions which are the basic constituents of particles and, indirectly through particles, of all of the more complex entities.

Whitehead also stated (in the paragraph from which Nobo quoted) that the «mutual immanence of contemporary actual entities is «of the indirect type» (Adventures 259).

That is, what I am maintaining is that the ultimate basis upon which Whitehead has distinguished the different «kinds» or «types» of entities is the different senses in which they «are.»

The quite fundamental issue and that which specially concerns us here — for it is that which Professor Buchler's discussion has brought to the fore — is the problem of the basis upon which a distinction into «kinds» or «types» of «entities» or «existence» is made at all.

Here is what Whitehead said in 1911 about the theory of types: «All the contradictions can be avoided, and yet the use of classes and relations can be preserved as required by mathematics, and indeed by common sense, by a theory which denies to a class — or relation — existence or being in any sense in which the entities composing it — or related by it — exist» (MAT 293).

Throughout these categories we find the descriptions of the various types of entity becoming more definite as the categories build to more complex explanations which involve the previous ones.

She says, «The type of immortality which a process conceptuality suggests is subjective, retaining the living experience of the entity, but it transcends personality... «11 And she adds,»... the boundaries of personality have been left far behind as pertinent solely to finite existence in the temporal world.

For the correspondence between the two to be identical, a civilized society would have to be the exact same kind of entity as some other type of Society, inanimate or personal for example, which of course is not the case.

While an event is relative in being internally related to other entities of the same logical type; which it requires by a necessity that is «particular and definite,» a species or genus is relative only in that it requires, by a necessity that is «generic or indefinite,» one or more intentional classes (of individuals or of other more specific kinds), all of which are only contingently nonempty (1970a, l0l f., 103, 109).

Thus the status of a civilized society is equivalent to that of a Society per se in that both types of «entities» are composed of constituents which are ontologically superior to the whole of which each of those constituents is a component.

And yet, even for psychicalism — and this explains the qualification «partly» — psychical concepts are also different from obviously formal ideas because they are categorial, and hence universally applicable, not to entities of all logical types, but only to «concrete singulars,» which is to say, individuals and events, as distinct both from aggregates, which are concrete but not singular, and all levels of qualities, which are merely abstract (141).

Thus each type of entity is a dependent existent, one which derives its being from the actuality of its constituents.

When Hartshorne says that there is a sense in which analogical terms apply literally to God and, therefore, simply are literal in this application, what he means by «literal» is not that such terms apply to God in the same sense in which they apply to any other entity of the same logical type, this being, as we have seen, what he otherwise takes «literal» to mean.

Thus, just as in Whitehead's categoreal system the two first - mentioned elements, absolute concreteness and unique occurrence, are united in the concept of a determinate, fundamental, categoreal existence (the concept of an occasion or actual entity), so the corresponding counter-elements, absolute abstractness and the character of abiding existence [lmmer - Gewesen - Sein], are joined together in another concept of an opposite categoreal type, that of an utterly abstract entity, which always was and always is, which Whitehead calls an eternal object.

This is why it is necessary to develop a «one - substance cosmology,» i.e., one in which there is only one type of actual entities (PR 29; cf. 28).

The finite entities chose some options and excluded others, which is a type of finitude.

The next stage was to accept that in many entities we have to consider a large number of interacting components, and processes of cause - effect which are not simply linear, but may interest either by being linked into networks, or by various types of feed - back interaction, positive or negative and so on.

In the «organic» theory, (i) there is only one type of temporal actual entity; (ii) each such actual entity is extensive; (iii) from the standpoint of any one actual entity, the «given» actual world is a nexus of actual entities, transforming the potentiality of the extensive scheme into a plenum of actual occasions; (iv) in this plenum, motion can not be significantly attributed to any actual occasion; (v) the plenum is continuous in respect to the potentiality from which it arises, but each actual entity is atomic; (vi) the term «actual occasion» is used synonymously with «actual entity»; but chiefly when its character of extensiveness has some direct relevance to the discussion, either extensiveness in the form of temporal extensiveness, that is to say «duration», or extensiveness in the form of spatial extension, or in the more complete signification of spatio - temporal extensiveness.

In one systematic passage in which the four stages of datum, process, satisfaction, and decision are described, this contrast is made in terms of two types of causation: «According to this account, efficient causation expresses the transition from actual entity to actual entity; and final causation expresses the internal process whereby the actual entity becomes itself» (PR 150/228).

«There then remain two alternatives for philosophy: (i) a monistic universe with the illusion of change; and (ii) a pluralistic universe in which «change» means the diversities among the actual entities which belong to some one society of a definite [personal] type» (PR 79).

Yet the latter entities do not perform nearly the type of deep dive that Sports Insights does, which is why the service has attracted attention from the sports betting industry.

In 2015, the IDA was informed by the New York State Authority Budget Office of the State Comptroller's Formal Opinion No.2014 - F1 which stated that Industrial Development Agency's did not have the legal authority to create subsidiaries for purposes outside of those specifically authorized in their enabling legislation and that IDA's are not authorized,» to make grants or loans of its money to any type of entity.»

Musser: Right and even our best microscope or, in a sense, microscope, is the Large Hadron Collider — the one being built or one about to start up, really, now in Switzerland — and it can penetrate to, I think it is 10 - 19 to -20 meters; in effect it's a microscope down to those distances; and the plank scale, the scale at which strings seem to operate these other types of entities is another 1015 times smaller; it is 10 - 35 meters.

The loan agreement was dated Sep 2016 and was made between Affinitas and certain persons and entities with an interest rate of 8 % (Loan type A) and 9 % per annum (Loan Type B) in an amount of $ 5.85 M ($ 1.85 M of which is under the Type A Loans and $ 4M of which is under the Type B Loatype A) and 9 % per annum (Loan Type B) in an amount of $ 5.85 M ($ 1.85 M of which is under the Type A Loans and $ 4M of which is under the Type B LoaType B) in an amount of $ 5.85 M ($ 1.85 M of which is under the Type A Loans and $ 4M of which is under the Type B LoaType A Loans and $ 4M of which is under the Type B LoaType B Loans).

Namely, bond coupon payments are determined by market interest rates, the type of issuing entity (government bonds pay lower coupons than corporate bonds because of lower default risk), the creditworthiness of the issuing entity (AAA companies pay lower coupons than CCC companies), and the maturity of the bond, which we will talk about next.

Agency bonds are issued by two types of entities — 1) Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), usually federally - chartered but privately - owned corporations; and 2) Federal Government agencies which may issue or guarantee these bonds — to finance activities related to public purposes, such as increasing home ownership or providing agricultural assistance.

The new measures now require funds to be more selective in the types of entities to which they lend money and to keep more of their money in shorter term loans so that they can more easily return investors» cash in the event of a run.

A bond issued by two types of entities — 1) Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs), usually federally - chartered but privately - owned corporations; and 2) Federal Government agencies which may issue or guarantee these bonds — to finance activities related to public purposes, such as increasing home ownership or providing agricultural assistance.

Because the Fund may invest more than 25 % of its total assets in municipal obligations issued by entities located in the same state or the interest on which is paid solely from revenues of similar projects, changes in economic, business or political conditions relating to a particular state or types of projects may have a disproportionate impact on the Fund.

To meet their emissions reduction obligations, regulated entities can reduce emissions on - site, trade emissions reductions achieved beyond the cap, or use emissions reductions generated in the state from a wide variety of project categories, nine of which are cited ACR offset project types.

Stakeholders Person or entity holding grants, concessions, or any other type of value which would be affected by a particular action or policy.

This type of entity provides an alternative to a general partnership for which the partners have unlimited personal liability for corporate debts.

Starting a business means many daunting choices: which type of business entity to form, how to finance it, potential liability, etc..

Self - Help Applications for the Public that provide preliminary guidance: — Which type of legal entity is right for your new venture?

Proving negligence in these types of cases is particularly complicated and the time period during which a claim can be filed against a government entity is smaller.

It's best to carefully weigh the pros and cons when deciding which type of business entity to set up — for example, you can choose between a Sole Proprietorship or Partnership, or an entity that offers liability protection (like an LLC, S - Corp, or C - Corp).

[32] The only other entity which is not a party that may, in a general sense, have an interest in this type of situation would be the Public Guardian and Trustee who, through its statutory obligation, has an interest in protecting infants in this type of context.

Last June, the Law Society of Upper Canada established a Task Force, which I chair, to consider whether it would be beneficial to implement some type of proactive, compliance - based entity regulation in Ontario.

Routine disclosures also are not subject to individual review; instead, covered entities must implement policies and procedures (which may be standard protocols) to limit the protected health information in routine disclosures to the minimum information reasonably necessary to achieve the purpose of that type of disclosure.

There are three types of denials for which covered entities must provide the individual with a right to review.

Covered entities must develop policies and procedures (which may be standard protocols) to apply to disclosures to routinely hired types of business associates.

For any type of disclosure that is made on a routine, recurring basis, a covered entity must implement policies and procedures (which may be standard protocols) that permit only the disclosure of the minimum protected health information reasonably necessary to achieve the purpose of the disclosure.

(i) For any type of disclosure that it makes on a routine and recurring basis, a covered entity must implement policies and procedures (which may be standard protocols) that limit the protected health information disclosed to the amount reasonably necessary to achieve the purpose of the disclosure.