I don't object to God and the Bible being
the ultimate authority in my life, just the incorporated church that has changed the facts about both of the above.
Not exact matches
Questions such as whether the language of «faith» has any
authority in a scientific age, or whether mind and
life are reducible to atoms and molecules, whether only the tangible is real, whether the human person is anything more than a complex physico - chemical mechanism, whether we are free or determined, whether there is any «objective» truth to the symbols and myths of religion — all of these questions are asked at all only because what is fundamentally at issue is whether there is an
ultimate context that gives meaning to cosmic process and significance to our
lives in this process.
Further, the distribution of the peoples of the earth is represented as being
in accord with divine purposes; even if not ethically determined, at least it was an expression of that impulse which the writers believed to be the
ultimate authority in human
life.
The armed forces are loyal, and we
live in a democracy, but actually their
ultimate authority is the Queen.»
Yet with no white - coated experimenter sitting
in our
living rooms, who is the
ultimate authority figure granting us permission to delight
in the pain of others?
Grand Baymen is the
ultimate authority on places to vacation and
live in Belize.
Obeying the
Authority of Scripture: Both individually and corporately Trinity Western wholeheartedly embraces all the Bible teaches
in regard to faith, ethical commitments, and way of
life, believing it to be the
ultimate standard of truth and hope.
«
In an Article 8 case where this question is reached, the ultimate question for the appellate immigration authority is whether the refusal of leave to enter or remain, in circumstances where the life of the family can not reasonably be expected to be enjoyed elsewhere, taking full account of all considerations weighing in favour of the refusal, prejudices the family life of the applicant in a manner sufficiently serious to amount to a breach of the fundamental right protected by Article
In an Article 8 case where this question is reached, the
ultimate question for the appellate immigration
authority is whether the refusal of leave to enter or remain,
in circumstances where the life of the family can not reasonably be expected to be enjoyed elsewhere, taking full account of all considerations weighing in favour of the refusal, prejudices the family life of the applicant in a manner sufficiently serious to amount to a breach of the fundamental right protected by Article
in circumstances where the
life of the family can not reasonably be expected to be enjoyed elsewhere, taking full account of all considerations weighing
in favour of the refusal, prejudices the family life of the applicant in a manner sufficiently serious to amount to a breach of the fundamental right protected by Article
in favour of the refusal, prejudices the family
life of the applicant
in a manner sufficiently serious to amount to a breach of the fundamental right protected by Article
in a manner sufficiently serious to amount to a breach of the fundamental right protected by Article 8.