It's unclear that a presidential decision to halt cost - sharing payments would
ultimately hold up in court, but it's also uncertain that payments would continue while the case is litigated.
I would submit that this form is most valuable to lawyers who end
up litigating on behalf of litigants claiming damages or defending their positions against same based upon not only dishonest and misleading statements that most assuredly appear on these SPIS smooth deal - facilitator documents, but also upon assumed honestly
held but nevertheless misleading statements (the seller «thinks» he / she knows the correct answer to a question, but
in fact does «not» know for sure, and guesses... yes... or no) that can
ultimately lead to an expensive
court case.