Sentences with phrase «ultimately take it to trial»

Not exact matches

In our Thai Cupid review, we're going to take a look at the sign - up process, the quality of the matches, how easy the site is to use, the features, customer support, costs and pricing, free trials, and ultimately whether or not this site is worth it or not for you.

He was ultimately arrested on gun charges and taken to jail where he has languished for over a year and a half without trial.

The Education Endowment Foundation is currently running randomised control trials to measure impact on young people's motivation, engagement and ultimately, destinations, although this last one will obviously take a few years.

The process may involve watching a product demo, taking advantage of free trials and asking POS - provider representatives a lot of questions, he explains, adding that retailers should ultimately be completely comfortable with their final decision and confident that the provider they chose to work with shares their values.

As I dug deeper I was struck by the sense of outrage and loss this painting aroused in so many people: The family of Lea Bondi, determined to reclaim the stolen portrait she had failed to recover in her lifetime; the Manhattan District Attorney who sent shock waves through the international art world and enraged many of New York's most prominent cultural organizations when he issued a subpoena and launched a criminal investigation following the surprise resurfacing of Portrait of Wally; the New York art dealer who tipped off a reporter about the painting during the opening of the Schiele exhibition at MoMA; the Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security who vowed not to retire until the fight was over; the art theft investigator who unearthed the post-war subterfuge and confusion that ultimately landed the painting in the hands of a young, obsessed Schiele collector; the museum official who testified before Congress that the seizure of Portrait of Wally could have a crippling effect on the ability of American museums to borrow works of art; the Assistant United States Attorney who took the case to the eve of trial; and the legendary Schiele collector who bartered for Portrait of Wally in the early 1950s and fought to the end of his life to bring it home to Vienna.

This earlier report concludes that self - represented litigants tend to take unreasonable positions in family law disputes which ultimately reduce the likelihood that these disputes will resolve without a trial.

In this case, Chief Justice Glenn Joyal of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench ultimately found that the time that a judge takes to arrive at a decision of guilty or not guilty should not be included in considering whether the length of a trial falls within the parameters established by Jordan.

Insurance companies quickly recognize attorneys that do not try cases and will keep settlement offers unreasonably low knowing that such attorneys will ultimately settle for less because they either do not want to, or can not, take a case to trial.

A lengthy sexual abuse case in Manitoba recently made the news, when a court decided that the trial process, which ultimately took well over 3.5 years, did not violate the accused's right to a timely trial.

Ultimately the choice of going to trial or taking a settlement is the client's to make.

While the defendant will no doubt say some of these tactics were ultimately vindicated by the result (which turned, to some degree, on the evidence of a witness who was summoned shortly before the sixth day of trial) the defendant has to take a significant share of the responsibility for the length of the trial and, as a result, the expense that was incurred.

As Lord Browne - Wilkinson said in 1993's Channel Tunnel Group Ltd. v. Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd.: «It would be a serious matter if the English courts were unable to grant interlocutory relief in cases where the substantive trial and the ultimate decision of the case might ultimately take place in a court outside England.»

Justice Abella then went on to suggest that if you were to take a lawyer from a hundred years ago and place them in a courtroom today, they would need a bit of time to get caught up on the new rules of civil procedure but ultimately would be able to run a trial.

Ultimately, a hotly - contested, complex divorce that must go to trial may take up to two years or more to complete.