Sentences with phrase «unadjusted data shows»

@AK: But the unadjusted data shows a much higher rate of rise for 1910 - 1945, before there was enough extra CO2 to make much difference.

But the unadjusted data shows a much higher rate of rise for 1910 - 1945, before there was enough extra CO2 to make much difference.

It's unadjusted data shows Canadian retail e-commerce increased almost 47 per cent in May from a year earlier.

When characterised this way, both adjusted and unadjusted data show virtually identical warming over this latter period.

Not exact matches

In the end, while the authors of this chapter do not disclose the actual correlations between their two measures and value - added, specifically (although from the appendix one can infer that the correlation between value - added and Tripod output is around r = 0.45 as based on an unadjusted r - squared), and I should mention this is a HUGE shortcoming of this chapter (one that would not have passed peer review should this chapter have been submitted to a journal for publication), the authors do mention that «the conceptual overlap between the frameworks is substantial and that empirical patterns in the data show similarities.»

The figure below shows these linear trends for the GISS data for each calendar month, for two data versions provided by GISS: unadjusted and «homogenised».

A comparison of HadSST2 with the NCDC temperature data, and of the unadjusted HadSST3 (i.e. without the new bias corrections) with NCDC using only common coverage ocean cells is shown in right panel of Figure 2.

However, the unadjusted data represented by the UKMO EN3 data shows cooling for depths of 0 - 750 meters through March 2012: LINK

While I used adjusted global mean data for the plot above, unadjusted global mean data shows essentially the same thing — an increasing trend, contrary to your claim above.

Since urban stations show a higher temperature (on average) compared to rural stations (on average), having more urban stations in the mix will increase the overall average temperature of even an unadjusted data set.

A plot of land - only unadjusted and UHI - adjusted GISTemp data would show a more discernible difference (but still not huge).

This indicates that the observed warming can not be an artifact of the adjustment process as the unadjusted GHCN version shows similar amounts of warming and the adjustments applied to raw ocean data decrease the amount of indicated warming.

As Figure 2 shows, the unadjusted data (pink) have tended to fall towards the lower end of IPCC projections in recent years, primarily due to the preponderance of La Niña events and an extended solar cycle minimum, which have short - term cooling influences on global surface temperatures.

Indeed, this is also what the unadjusted raw temperature data for many places in Australia shows.

Mi Cro August 30, 2014 at 2:53 pm Clive, that's all fine and dandy, except those warming trends did not take place globally, they were regional trends.............................. We are finalising an analysis for Australia that shows of the claimed 1 deg C or so of warming since 1900, the maximum temperature change based on unadjusted data is half that or less, so 0.45 degrees for the century in the USA would fall neatly in the range we estimate for Australia.