Sentences with phrase «unaffordable legal services»

And law societies don't have a government - type civil service to provide the necessary continuing expertise for solving such problems as unaffordable legal services.

So problems like unaffordable legal services, and the very poor «legal health and knowledge» of the Canadian population, are left to get worse, decade after decade.

This gap in innovation is attributed to a reason for unaffordable legal services.

That is why the present unaffordable legal services problem makes victims of the majority of Canada's population.

There has been no such national effort to solve the national unaffordable legal services problem, and no progress towards a solution.

Law society efforts and access to justice committees have been in effect for several years now, but the victims of unaffordable legal services continue to grow in size and number.

But the law societies have failed to be proactive about unaffordable legal services, but they are in regard to the much less serious problem of incompetent and unethical lawyers.

To best serve self - represented litigants (SRL's): (1) define the problem of unaffordable legal services accurately; (2) determine the exact cause of the problem; and then, (3) devise a feasible, effective solution.

The cause of unaffordable legal services is the lack of innovation in the method of providing legal services.

Law society benchers are part - time because they are practicing lawyers, and they are «amateurs» because the major problems of law societies, such as unaffordable legal services, are not legal problems.

So, to avoid being too short of time and stress - endurance, benchers don't tackle difficult problems like unaffordable legal services.

This article, «Access to Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions,» (pdf) deals with the cause and the solution to the unaffordable legal services problem, and the responsibility of Canada's law societies for that cause.

Law societies are the cause of the unaffordable legal services problem.

(3) the unaffordable legal services problem, i.e., the majority of the population can not afford a lawyer's advice, therefore they must go to court unrepresented by counsel.

Malcolm your favorite solution, alternate business structures (ABSs), they can not solve the unaffordable legal services problem because they propose no change in the method of producing legal services.

The law societies are doing nothing to solve the unaffordable legal services problem.

The Committee's Report makes no reference to the impact of the unaffordable legal services problem upon the court system and its unacceptable levels of delay.

And see: (1) «Access to Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions» (SSRN, pdf.

«The Technology of Centralized Legal Research Can Solve the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»;

This is the wrong approach to the «access to justice problem of unaffordable legal services,» because:

See these articles: (1) «Access to Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions» (SSRN, August 29, 2017, pdf.)

Support services methods of production are essential to solving the «unaffordable legal services problem.»

As a result, the unaffordable legal services problem is inevitable.

But because law societies in Canada have done nothing to try to solve the unaffordable legal services problem («the problem»), they have undercut their ability to prosecute them for UPL for the reason that such organizations are not themselves licensed lawyers.

Because law society management structure has not changed since its 19th century creation (Monday, July 17, 1797, for LSUC, while the French Revolution still raged, as did Britain's trans - Atlantic slave trade until 1807), law societies are not capable of solving the unaffordable legal services problem by sponsoring the innovations that would enable law firms to produce affordable legal services.

Therefore, the failure of law societies to take action against a problem the size and duration of unaffordable legal services, justifies government intervention under the federal government's «trade and commerce» power of s. 91 of The Constitution Act, 1867.

Apps can not cure the problem of unaffordable legal services.

As a result, the A2J problem of unaffordable legal services is inevitable because law firms do not have the necessary high degree of specialization and volume of production that produce the economies - of - scale necessary to maintain legal services as affordable.

Obfuscation of law society responsibility for affordability as the cause of the unaffordable legal services problem?

They appear to be an important part of the Law Society of Upper Canada's (LSUC's) response to the unaffordable legal services problem («the problem»).