Sentences with phrase «unanimous consensus in»

But there's a virtually unanimous consensus in the literature that rebound is likely to be significantly higher in emerging economies, where demand is far from saturated and efficiency improvements make energy cheaper and more useful for accelerated industrialization and economic growth.

There is a near - unanimous consensus in the medical community that breast is best, with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending that mothers exclusively breastfeed infants for a minimum of 6 months.

Not exact matches

Teams that fall victim to groupthink develop the illusion that they are unanimous in their thinking (silence is perceived as evidence of consensus).

That does not amount to a long tradition of treating sodomy as a right, but it does suggest a widespread (although not unanimous) consensus that the state should not criminalize such private conduct in the home.

That does not amount to along tradition of treating sodomy as a right, but it does suggest a widespread (although not unanimous) consensus that the state should not criminalize such private conduct in the home.

Quenton Nelson was a unanimous All - American (Mike McGlinchey was a consensus All - American) but that was it for individual praise - for one of the greatest players in Notre Dame history.

«I was pleasantly surprised by the fact that there were unanimous decisions about most issues, and strong consensus on the others,» says Ron Fouchier, a flu virologist at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, whose study has been accepted by the journal Science.

Last November, every major news outlet and pollster said Donald Trump would lose the presidential election, and just last week there was similarly unanimous consensus that Britain's Conservative Party was headed to a big win in its own election.

While there was a remarkable degree of consensus on our main picks, it was by no means unanimous, so we've included a few extras that some panel members felt strongly about in the «Honourable mentions» sidebar on page 50.

In such a case it makes rather more sense to weight near - unanimous scientific consensus positions than the weight assigned to some uncredentialed fringe or another.

«Such surveys are often cited as demonstrating a near - unanimous scientific consensus in favor of a climate policy, when they never ask any question about whether and to what extent the anthropogenic component in recent warming might be dangerous or about whether a «climate policy» should be adopted in attempted mitigation of future warming.»

The Cook 97 % paper was designed and constructed in what was a premeditated, non-scientific and dishonest attempt to make the public believe that there is a nearly unanimous consensus among climate scientists that humans have caused from > 50 % to 100 %, of recent global warming.

MIT professor Richard Lindzen, Ph.D., one of 11 scientists who prepared the National Academy of Sciences 2001 report on global warming, has stated repeatedly that there were a wide variety of scientific views presented in that report, and that the full report made clear that there is no consensus, unanimous or otherwise, about long - term climate trends and what causes them.

Yes, Profe Schlesinger does not equal unanimous or even «generally agreed consensus» however not even mentioning such a serious finding but at least, a serious scientist and participant in the conference, seems to me like you are «sexing down» your story.

For example, regarding the validity of the evidence that the basic greenhouse gas mechanism is causing recent global warming, there is near - unanimous scientific consensus among the experts that have real climate credentials, are working in the field with a position in a recognized scientific department at a university or laboratory (not a right - wing think tank), and who publish in the peer - reviewed scientific literature (non-peer reviewed think tank papers don't count).

That being said, the Treaties clearly make a distinction between situations requiring a unanimous vote by the European Council (e.g. guidelines in the Common Foreign and Security Policy field) and areas where decisions are to be taken by consensus (e.g. guidelines in the area of Freedom, Justice and Security)

Constitutional Law: Senate Reform Senate Reference (Order in Council P.C. 2013 - 70, Feb. 1, 2013)(35203) Apr. 25, 2014 Parliament can not unilaterally achieve most of the proposed changes to the Senate, requiring the consent of at least seven provinces representing, in the aggregate, at least half of the population of all the provinces; abolition requires consent of all of the provinces and can only be done with unanimous federal - provincial consensus.