Sentences with phrase «unanimous opinion of the court»

Delivering the unanimous opinion of the Court and citing Stolt - Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int» l Corp., 559 U. S. 662, 684 (2010), Justice Kagan concluded that the arbitrator's decision survives the limited judicial review § 10 (a)(4) allows.

Not exact matches

In a unanimous opinion, the Court asserted, for the first time, that «the federal judiciary is supreme in the exposition of the law of the Constitution.»
Because public opinion supporting certain kinds of abortion is close to unanimous; it was formed before the 1973 Supreme Court decision; and the majority that have come of sexual age since that year now take for granted that fertility decisions are to be made only by the individuals involved.
In a unanimous opinion today, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected patents behind a diagnostic test sold by Prometheus Laboratories of San Diego, California.
In a unanimous opinion on April 5, a three - judge panel of the San Francisco - based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit reinstated a jury award that a federal magistrate judge threw out in 2002.
Roberts did not have a convincing explanation as to why the court would have made this plain statement in a unanimous opinion if it were not obvious to the court in 1971 that this was the proper understanding of Brown.
Consistent with NSBA's position as outlined in its «friend of the court» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rcourt» (amicus) brief, Justice Samuel Alito delivered the Court's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rCourt's unanimous opinion and found that the school officials in this case should not be viewed as law enforcement agents, and the statements made by the young child to the teachers were not given with the «primary purpose of creating an out - of - court substitute for trial testimony.&rcourt substitute for trial testimony.»
(District of Columbia) In a carefully - worded but unanimous opinion, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the right of students with disabilities to a «free appropriate public education» requires more than a simple compliance «check list» from schools.
The majority opinion of Justice Stewart was specifically approved by a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada in Hunter v Southam Inc., [1984] 2 SCR 145 where Justice Brian Dickson held, at p. 159, that s. 8 of the Charter containing the constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure is not restricted to the protection of property or associated with the law of trespass, at p. 159: «[I] n Katz... Stewart J. delivering the majority opinion of the United States Supreme Court declared at p. 351 that «the Fourth Amendment protects people, not places».
So begins an opinion that a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued today.
The week before senators plan to vote on the man who is likely to take her seat on the Court, the Supreme Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the unanimous Court's opinion that the state of New Hampshire has overreached in its requirement that all minors inform their parents 48 hours before an abortion, without exception for a minor's health.
Most recently, in R v Oakes, 2016 ABCA 90, the case that is my topic here, the majority ruling of Justices Myra Bielby and Frederica Schutz, at para. 11, adopted the opinion in R v Truscott (2007), 225 CCC (3d) 321 (Ont CA) where a unanimous five member panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal stated, at para. 110, that the power to overturn a conviction founded in a miscarriage of justice, ``... can reach virtually any kind of error that renders the trial unfair in a procedural or substantive way.»
And I have also written about the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Riley v California, 573 US 1 (2014) where Chief Justice John Roberts held that a warrantless search and seizure of digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest violates the Fourth Amendment and is unconstitutional.
A Judge may be deprived of his office or of his right to a pension or other benefits in its stead only if, in the unanimous opinion of the Judges and Advocates - General of the Court of Justice, he no longer fulfils the requisite conditions or meets the obligations arising from his office.
So begins an opinion that a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued today.
A unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit today issued an opinion holding that «state sovereign immunity is not a defense to this action.»
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, and IV - B, and the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts IV - A and V, in which BLACKMUN, O'CONNOR, SCALIA, and THOMAS, JJ., joined.
In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court of the United States has clarified what constitutes a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act («ADA»).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z