Sentences with phrase «unauthorized copying as»

Opponents of DRM, on the other hand, see unauthorized copying as more of a social and business issue.

Please check the address bar of your browser — if you are NOT looking at this page at http://www.singledating.com/blog/ then you are almost certainly reading an unauthorized copy as this content is exclusive to SingleDating.com and it is copyright (yes I know, but they will even try to copy this part too!)

Please now check your browser's address bar: if you're not seeing this «Find Love: Meet A Girl Who Is Right For Mee» article at http://www.singledating.com/blog/ then you are probably reading an unauthorized copy as this content is exclusive to SingleDating.com and is copyright (yes, the copyright violators will sometimes even copy this notice!)

Please check the address bar of your browser — if you aren't looking at this senior singles dating page at http://www.singledating.com/blog/ then you are almost certainly reading an unauthorized copy as this content is exclusive to SingleDating.com and is copyright (yes, I know, but they will even copy this bit too!)

Please check your browser's address bar: if you're not seeing this «Dating Tips For Women and Girls» post at http://www.singledating.com/blog/ then you are most likely reading an unauthorized copy as this content is exclusive to SingleDating.com and is copyright.

Not exact matches

We will protect personal information by reasonable security safeguards against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use or modification.

Researchers defined a security violation as any unauthorized access to confidential data, which could include copying, transferring or selling that information to a third party for personal gains.

We will protect personal information by reasonable security safeguards against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use or modification.

promotes or enables unauthorized copying of another person's copyrighted work, such as providing computer programs or links to them, providing information to circumvent manufacture - installed copy - protect devices, or providing music or links to music files;

Copyright prevents unauthorized resellers from copying and selling your work, protecting your earnings as an author.

But it didn't cover watermarking; it covered searching for unauthorized copies of e-books on the Internet based on metadata, such as filenames and book titles.

Pottermore famously employs digital watermarks as a form of «social DRM,» meaning that the technology doesn't prevent people from copying or sharing ebooks, but does discourage unauthorized sharing by making it socially undesirable (since the purchaser can easily be traced).

Briefly, scholarly works are meant to be distributed as widely as possible with no restrictions, while textbooks for higher ed (college / university) are «locked down» as much as possible because students are not willing buyers and take many opportunities to make unauthorized copies.

Having said that, DRM is effective at curtailing the most basic types of unauthorized copying, halting casual (or perhaps unintentional) theft, such as sharing a single copy of a book with your friends and family.

The majority of eBooks we've worked with do not bother enabling digital rights management as it can potentially inhibit the legitimate purchasers of your book, but do little to thwart the unauthorized copying and use of your eBook.

Is or promotes an illegal or unauthorized copy of another person's work, such as providing pirated computer programs or links to them, provides information to circumvent manufacturer - installed copy - protect devices, or provides pirated content or links to pirated content files;

Just got sent a copy of a pretty interesting book, «Halo Effect: An Unauthorized Look at the Most Successful Video Game of All Time», which is described as»... examining the Halo phenomenon from every angle... from profiling the greatest Halo player who ever lived to providing a behind - the - scenes look at the making of the wildly popular, virtual - reality Halo movies.»

It is clearly a copyright infringement to duplicate and publicly display your unauthorized copies of their artwork, unless your work is exempt as a parody, or the like.

Copyright law does not distinguish between making an unauthorized copy from a DVD that you own, as opposed to one that you stole.

The Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act («PIPEDA») requires organizations to take reasonable steps to safeguard the personal information in their custody or control from such risks as unauthorized access, collection, use, disclosure, copying, modification, disposal or destruction.

34 (1) An organization must protect personal information that is in its custody or under its control by making reasonable security arrangements against risks such as unauthorized access, collection, use, disclosure, copying, modification, disposal or destruction.

This license does not include any downloading or copying of any kind of information for the benefit of another individual, vendor or any other third party; caching, unauthorized hypertext links to the Site and the framing of any Content available through the Site uploading, posting, or transmitting any content that you do not have a right to make available (such as the intellectual property of another party); uploading, posting, or transmitting any material that contains software viruses or any other computer code, files or programs designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of any computer software or hardware or telecommunications equipment; any action that imposes or may impose (in Policybazaar's sole discretion) an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on Policybazaar's infrastructure; or any use of data mining, robots, or similar data gathering and extraction tools.

We will protect personal information by reasonable security safeguards against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use or modification.

We will protect personal information by reasonable security safeguards against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use or modification.

If the copyright was registered prior to the first unauthorized copying or within 3 months of first publication of the copyrighted work, the copyright owner may instead elect, any time before final judgment is rendered, to recover statutory damages between $ 750 and $ 30,000, as determined by the court.

You are specifically prohibited from any use of this Web Site, and You agree not to use or permit others to use this Web Site, to: (a) take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the Web Site's infrastructure, including but not limited to «spam» or other such unsolicited mass e-mailing techniques; (b) disclose or share the assigned confirmation numbers and / or passwords with any unauthorized third parties or use the assigned confirmation numbers and / or passwords for any unauthorized purpose; (c) attempt to decipher, decompile, disassemble or reverse engineer any of the software or HTML code comprising or in any way making up a part of this Web Site; (d) upload, post, email or otherwise transmit any information, Content, or proprietary rights that You do not have a right to transmit under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships; (e) violate any applicable local, state, national or international law, including, but not limited to, any regulations having the force of law; or (f) use any robot, spider, intelligent agent, other automatic device, or manual process to search, monitor or copy our Web pages, or the Content without our prior written permission, provided that generally available third party Web browser such as Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer ® may be used without such permission.

9 DOS 94 Matter of DOS v. Shane - motion for pre-hearing discovery beyond SAPA 401 (6) is denied; rules re: subpoenas in administrative proceedings reiterated; proper procedure of reserving right to file post-hearing memorandum of law; MLS form listing agreements are acceptable; individual license not sufficient to allow acting as representative of corporate licensee - need affiliated license; agreements procured by individual acting under name of firm but without affiliated license are illegal and unenforceable - no brokerage fee can be claimed; misrepresentation and execution of unauthorized extension; misrepresentation of law (distinction between canceling agency authority and abiding contract rights); RPL § 443 controls the disclosures required of licensees; subsequently licensed corporation not vicariously liable; failure to provide copy of agreement (19 NYCRR 175.12); inadvertence considered in determining penalty

189 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Naftal - listing agreements; deposits; unauthorized practice of law; vicarious liability; amendment of pleading to conform to the proof; improperly altering listing agreement without the consent or knowledge of principal to show the potential commission split with buyer's broker to meet MLS requirements; preparing and submitting fraudulent MLS change notifications purporting to extend and alter listings; deposit of escrow funds into operating account; preparation of lease constitutes the unauthorized practice of law; pleadings may be amended to conform to the proof and encompass a charge not stated in the complaint where the issue has been fully litigated by the parties and is closely enough related to the stated charges that there is no surprise or prejudice to the respondent; continuing to offer properties for sale after preparation of forged listing extensions violates 19 NYCRR 175.10; DOS fails to establish violation of 19 NYCRR 175.12 for failure to provide copy of listing extension where extension was not authorized by principal; DOS fails to demonstrate demand for unearned commission where broker may have believed they were entitled to a commission; broker's licenses suspended for one year and thereafter until such time as restitution in the amounts of $ 5,000.00 and $ 2,055.40 is made