Sentences with phrase «unbelievers then»

Because if he is not cool with you killing unbelievers then he has changed his mind.

But if you are an extreme unbeliever then I hope that you give some room or space for us believers in faiths of GOD to discuss their indifference's by gathering the Puzzle to lay out the base of the «Foundation of the Holy Book» before that which no one knows of but GOD just as the verses speaks of here...!?!

Not exact matches

Thank - you Cecilia, but if you don't believe, then you are where you are because of your unbelief, and what fellowship does a believer have with an unbeliever: We are not of the same Spirit: Therefore it can not be, even as is written:

If by some wild stretch of imagination there was a heaven (which there isn't) and I was not allowed to ever enter because I was an unbeliever, then fine by me.

If there is no God, then we all have nothing to lose, but if there is... you unbelievers have hell to look forward to for the rest of your days and then some.

It's even sadder when we think we're better then unbelievers.

Unbelievers often view Christians as phonies; we preach the love of Jesus, then kick a few outcasts along the way.

But after their stories are out there for a while, and substantiating evidence and maybe even proof starts rolling in, and the tide seems to turn and their peers start believing too, then sometimes the unbelievers change their minds and listen to the victims, the survivors, and the marginalized.

Then I redirected my prayer life (still as an unbeliever!)

I believe this is the first place the unbeliever goes but then all of Hell is cast into the «Lake of fire.»

In the Scripture itself Allah defiantly stressed the impossibility of imitating the Qur» an when He said to the unbelievers, «And if ye are in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto Our slave (Muhammad), then produce a surah of the like thereof, and call your witnesses beside Allah if ye are truthful.

Blessed are the Cheesemakers, «Exactly, because if they had any actual connection to reality they could be shown to be true and unbelievers would then become believers.

Exactly, because if they had any actual connection to reality they could be shown to be true and unbelievers would then become believers.

Then there are church leaders who say that the church service is primarily for unbelievers.

10:28 above... then the Fundamentalists should change their view on «hell» to be a «destruction» of the body and soul in hell for those who are unbelievers... in other words, annihilation... not eternal torment.

Yet I find it ironic that many Calvinists will then try to reason with unbelievers about how they need Jesus, and also reason with non-Calvinists about the rationality of Calvinism.

Yes, unbelievers often do not understand the things of God... bu then, many «believers» struggle with this as well.

If unbelievers start wars and kill each other, then let them.

Through their words and actions, an evangelist helps bring unbelievers to believe in Jesus for eternal life, and then brings believers to follow Jesus in their life.

If God is the one who imparts faith to the unbeliever, then the responsibility to believe lies not with man but with God, and therefore, God can have no basis on which to judge people for failing to believe.

Then after giving unconditional election a second and more Biblical look, I went through the musing s about how it could be true if all unbelievers go to eternal hellfire torment, and then I got hit with the realization that the New Testament teaches eternal torment for Satan and his followers, which I heartily endorse, but It teaches destruction for unbelievThen after giving unconditional election a second and more Biblical look, I went through the musing s about how it could be true if all unbelievers go to eternal hellfire torment, and then I got hit with the realization that the New Testament teaches eternal torment for Satan and his followers, which I heartily endorse, but It teaches destruction for unbelievthen I got hit with the realization that the New Testament teaches eternal torment for Satan and his followers, which I heartily endorse, but It teaches destruction for unbelievers.

Sometimes, we overlook the sins of other believers because we recognize they are «sinners saved by grace» but then condemn and correct certain behaviors of unbelievers because we want to show our separation from the world.

And if that does not satisfy them, they are obviously showing an unhealthy interest in controversy and disputes about interpretation of Scripture and are causing divisions and should be treated like an unbeliever until they feel remorse (for being neglected) and repent of their waywardness and then you can invite them back into the fold as a brother.

But if a Calvinist takes the alternate opinion, along with Hoekema, and says that Romans 7 describes the condition and experience of the unbeliever, then this text creates problems for their teachings on total inability.

Tiggy said, on November 17th, 2009 at 11:55 am I guess if one goes to church and just ignores the theology, then that's okay, but if you have someone suggesting that Satan is influencing your life in some way, and you want to stand up and say, «I don't actually believe in this being you think is influencing my life, then you are immediately considered a heretic or an unbeliever or even socially unacceptable in a not so subtle, yet unarticulated way.

Paul has just told us what we were like as unbelievers, and then he begins Ephesians 2:13 with the words, But now.

You said... «If I am wrong, I have only lived a good life, as there is nothing beyond the grave, however, if I am right (which I know I am) then you unbelievers have a lot to worry about»

If we are fellow workers with God in the creation of a fully achieved humanity, then the problem suggested above — that art in praise of God can stand on its own and be beautiful even to the eyes of the unbeliever — should not surprise us.

Justification in the sight of man by way of sanctification or becoming ever more like Christ is a process which has the potential of saving others.; this by exemplifying through faith in action that faith alone in the blood of Christ alone saves you, this on the hope of attracting believers from faith to faith in action and unbelievers first to faith and salvation and then to faith in action, paying it forward, growing His Kingdom.

No need to take my word, warning comes before destruction and it Jesus Christ who shall give you the very evidence that you refused to accept while being alive and by then, it will be too late for the unbeliever and the religious people who has taught false doctrines.

If you don't understand that hell was made for Satan then perhaps you also don't believe that we as Christ followers have an enemy and his role here on earth... most unbelievers are living a hell down here so when I preach or do one on one evangelism, I most certainly inform them of hell... I could quote verses here but really you just need to have solid theology....

His identity is not in death, for then he would be an unbeliever.

Is the issue then that believers are called to a higher standard than unbelievers and the governments of the world?

But then in 14:24, he writes that if people are speaking in tongues, and an unbeliever comes in, they will think we are crazy, but if we are prophesying, then they might be convicted.

No - one has the right to comment on whether someone's living by the flesh or the Spirit unless they are commenting on clear outward signs of good or bad — Jesus» encouragement to judge a tree by its fruit has come back to me again and again as I meet «unbelievers» who have much in common with me until we talk about God and then to quote Rob Bell «the God they have turned their back on is not the God I believe.»

So the primary functions of the church are to invite unbelievers to believe in Jesus for eternal life, and then to invite believers to follow Jesus in this life.

You correctly point out that if turning from sin is a requirement for salvation then our works are a necessary part of salvation; but I would go further and say that an unbeliever simply can not change their minds about sin.

[2.191] And kill them wherever you find them, and drive them out from whence they drove you out, and persecution is severer than slaughter, and do not fight with them at the Sacred Mosque until they fight with you in it, but if they do fight you, then slay them; such is the recompense of the unbelievers.

I judged him then to be that sort of serious unbeliever» faithful to honesty, courage, and the community of inquiry concerning God» who shares much in common with the serious believer who works in darkness.

We are told, as unbelievers, that we will go to hell, be punished, god will get us and so on.And you wonder why we come on here and ask questions, and then point out the fallacies in your logic, and you appear to not offer any evidence to the contrary.

How then can Christians, whose scriptures so frequently ring with the phrase, «thus says the Lord,» be expected to live with unbelievers who deny God's sovereignty to begin with?

For a Christian to truly believe what the Bible says about unbelievers and then not warn them would be a terrible offense.

God the Holy Spirit uses us to provide information regarding Christ and His work on the cross and then the Holy Spirit uses that information to convict the unbeliever.

Quran (25:52)-- «Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness...» Quran (33:60 - 62)-- «If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.

Unbelievers are judged for their works or sins and then are destined for a Christless eternity.

Children are born in a state of fitra (purity) and then their parents teach them to be believers or unbelievers.

Better information would help but if people refuse to take it, what are you gonna do (besides building up a political majority and then forcing the relevant policies on the unbelievers, which ultimately is what will happen, of course).

Also, if the unbeliever leaves the marital relationship permanently but is not willing to file for divorce, perhaps because of lifestyle, irresponsibility, or to avoid monetary obligations, then the believer is in an impossible situation of having legal and moral obligations that he or she can not fulfill.