But in no case should a reporter who wishes to portray with accuracy the debates about global warming, present a minority view unbacked by science and promoted by businesses with a small, old dog in a very tough dog fight, as equivalent to hard science from
unbiased scientists with no economic interest in anything but getting the facts and predictions right.
Some unscrupulous marketers even go so far as to present themselves as
unbiased scientists with graphs and charts and numbers all meant to mislead people into believing their competitors products are low quality.
Not exact matches
One chance in 10 40,000, a possibility that even British
scientist Sir Fred Hoyle clearly recognized as impossible,
with him once stating that this is «the same as the chance of throwing an uninterrupted sequence of 50,000 sixes
with unbiased dice!»
Their «frackademics» are bought and paid for to tout the industry as opposed to the real
unbiased scientists who week after week are finding inherent problems
with fracking that can not be prevented.»
In this new study and for the first time,
scientists used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) combined
with a standard clinical trial design to derive an
unbiased brain - based neurological marker to predict analgesia associated
with placebo treatment in patients
with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain.
With so many proposals, and with mission teams averaging 20 people each, some Venus scientists wondered whether enough unbiased colleagues were left in the community to competently review the propos
With so many proposals, and
with mission teams averaging 20 people each, some Venus scientists wondered whether enough unbiased colleagues were left in the community to competently review the propos
with mission teams averaging 20 people each, some Venus
scientists wondered whether enough
unbiased colleagues were left in the community to competently review the proposals.
I deny the use of proxies that do not correlate
with measured data I deny that all
scientist are
unbiased I deny that there is an explanation for how the first cell was formed.
I was anticipating an informative
unbiased assessment of Global Warming / Climate Change
with new facts and involvement of knowledgeable
scientists in the field.
Perhaps it's not the most
unbiased thing that a
scientist can do
with his / her time, but at least they are being upfront about their beliefs, prejudices and visions.
You're also now complaining about the fact that climate
scientists have run corrections on data
with known and well - understood bias errors, implying that the raw data is somehow «pure» and that the
unbiased data has somehow been made «corrupt.»
How can that be considered compatible
with the
unbiased role we expect of
scientists?