Sentences with phrase «unborn child does»

At least when we have s e x and unborn child doesn't end up in an abortion clinic trash can.

the unborn child did not.

Not exact matches

Tell me, little Unborn Child, what did the Creator say?Did He wrap you in His love, and wipe your tears away?You hover on the edge of time.I see your faceless form.You laugh whenever children play, Oh, God, for you I mourn!He sent His only Precious Sonto teach us all «the Way.»

Prove to me that that unborn child should die for what we have done in the name of adultery, War, and lust..

Certainly the lives of women are as important as those of unborn children, but no one in America or abroad advocates the slaughter of thousands of women annually, while many do defend murder of the unborn.

She added: «We recognize that there are difficulties women face with pregnancies, especially in cases where the unborn child may be born with a life - limiting disease, but we do not believe that abortion is the answer, and that funding for a free abortion in another country is short - sighted as it neglects any mention of an offer of counselling or care for the woman.»

Causing the death of an unborn child is in the Bible, for in the Bible at Exodus 21, it says that «in case men should struggle with each other and they really hurt a pregnant woman and her children do come out but no fatal accident occurs, he is to have damages imposed upon him without fail according to what the owner of the woman may lay upon him; and he must give it through the justices.

The media hounded Tim Farron for his Christian views; they did not regard it as acceptable for him to hold views other than those of the political elite, or the majority, Similarly, our belief in the personhood of the unborn child and the sanctity of their lives enables us to see abortion as a sin crying to heaven for justice, not merely some privately held opinion; for us it is most definitely not «a woman's choice».

God DOES allow free will, which is precisely why killing unborn children is currently legal in the US.

So, Democrats — including several Catholics, such as Senator Tim Kaine, who are «personally» though not professionally opposed to abortion — voted to filibuster the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, and the Republican leaders who could have moved a bump stock ban bill to the floor after the Las Vegas massacre did not.

Suppose your unborn child was determined in the first trimester to be grossly malformed, unlikely to live, possibly to kill you during pregnancy; and if if it did live without killing you, to have a life of severe pain and suffering with the hope of nothing resembling, or even close to, normal life.

If an unborn child is a human being, it doesn't belong to you, unless of course you believe in slavery.

To do so would be to neglect the reality that her choice — whatever it becomes — impacts the lives of her family, her boyfriend Tom, Tom's family, her unborn child if she is pregnant, her schoolmates, her youth group at church and potentially many others whose lives intersect with hers.

If they didn't find a couple willing to adopt the unborn child by the end of day, they would abort it, according to the priest.

But, I just wonder when you speak of those marginalized, do you include unborn children, who have far less of a voice in politics than do the homosexual community?

Unfortunately, they don't have the sense of autonomy that would lead them to refuse sex if their own life - chances (as well as those of their as - yet - unborn children) are in danger of being damaged by male reluctance to use the simple means of contraception readily available.

If we give X a right to do as she wants, and she wants to get an abortion, we must soon face the question of protecting her from Y, who wants to protect the rights of unborn children.

2) it is only a matter of time until we will have the scientific ability to do the kind of care you are talking about with the unborn (someone other than the mother caring & nurturing the child).

What sense does it make to kill an unborn child to prevent future mistreatment?

Why is there a pair of pro-life billboards where I live that say «When you are at the pearly gates and God asks you «did you protect unborn children» what will your answer be?»

However, the pro-abortion group does not agree that unborn children are human beings.

That seems to me the same issue as the abortion decision, except that the unborn child has a great deal longer to live if you don't press that particular button.

Only when I thought either Jennifer or my unborn child — or even both — could die did I realize how important they were and how destroyed my life would be if I lost them.

When my own children disobey me, it hurts me as a parent, but I don't stop loving them neither can I make them be unborn to me.

Perhaps the humanity of the unborn child that everyone instinctively recognises is easier to suppress if you don't wake up in the night feeling a baby turning somersaults inside you nor be expected to accept chronic sickness because taking anti-nausea drugsmight harm the tiny life you are incubating.

Inside the idea that «conscience» can permit or even require us to do something long understood to be wrong, period, where's the circuit - breaker that would stop a couple from «discerning» that an abortion is the best resolution of the difficulties involved in carrying this unborn child to term, although under future circumstances they would embrace the «ideal» and welcome a child into their family?

People who think homosexuals should not have special legal entitlements as a minority group, parents who do not want their eight - year - olds instructed in the use of condoms, those who insist that abortion is very bad for unborn children and their mothers — bigots one and all.

While we should no doubt seek to do justice to all concerned, one can not help but note the dramatic disparities between what is at stake for the unborn child, the mother, and the politician.

God killed all those people for a reason, the expectant mother kills her unborn child for a reason, do you think they are both evil?

The reason the abortion issue is so foundational is not because Catholics love little babies ¯ although we certainly do ¯ but because revoking the personhood of unborn children makes every other definition of personhood and human rights politically contingent.

She has reasons for her decision, do you think she is evil if she chooses to kill her unborn child?

For example, to condemn lethal organ harvesting, or pre-viability removal of an unborn child from its mother, it is not necessary to claim that the surgeon «must» have intended the foreseen death for the unborn child or the organ donor — as a result of what he did intend for the object of his assault.

Say: «Come, let me convey unto you what G - D has [really] forbidden to you: «Do not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.&raquDo not ascribe divinity, in any way, to anything (or anyone) beside HIM; and [do not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.&raqudo not offend against but, rather,] do good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.&raqudo good unto your parents; and do not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.&raqudo not kill your children (born or unborn) for fear of poverty --[for] it is WE who shall provide sustenance for you as well as for them; and do not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.&raqudo not commit any shameful deeds, be they open or secret; and do not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.&raqudo not take any human being's life -[the life] which G - D has declared to be sacred - otherwise than in [the pursuit of] justice: this has HE enjoined upon you so that you might use your reason; and do not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.&raqudo not touch the substance of an orphan — except to improve it - before he comes of age.»

Murder is done in abortion, the unborn child is innocent.

The killing of an unborn child due the child's mother being physically injured does not contend one nowadays to seek wanton and sigh, legal abortion upon the mother's will to wantonly abort.

Does anyone else find it peculiar that an Unborn Fetus is sacred and holy and when the child is born without monetary support the once sacred Fetus becomes a welfare food stamp bum and cheat not worthy of an education?

With many of these issues, there did seem to be a clear Christian position — on the abortion of unborn children, for instance, and on the need to stabilize families.

«When they see the child moving in the womb on an ultrasound, when they hear the heartbeat of the unborn child, when they know there are people and programs available to help them with a new baby and new circumstances, when they see what dismemberment abortion does to these precious children, the pain and agony that is involved in every chemical abortion, they look for life - preserving solutions that are better for everyone involved.»

But, at quickening (animation, enlivening), the unborn child exhibited something that no merely constructed thing could do: It moved itself.

Nick, I'm quite certain that Jesus would cut Planned Parenthood as he would never agree with killing innocent unborn children as liberals seem very eager to do.

NO - does it violate the hypocratic oath doctors and nurses have to take if they allow a mother to suffer to attempt to save the unborn child?

In most churches, we don't think twice about preaching on issues such as raising children, marriage, or even protecting the unborn.

God did not zap Joseph any more than God zapped Mary; Joseph was free to continue with his plan to put Mary away and leave her to deal with the unborn child.

Whatever one thinks about its legality, abortion has nothing to do with advancing human «health,» and a large number of Americans regard it as a gravely wrong act of violence, not only against unborn children but also against women.

This means that if you could legally do something with a born child, you'd be able to do that same thing legally with an unborn child.

Miriam adds, «They should change the name of the center to the «Unborn Children Center» since they don't seem to care too much about the women involved.»

Although I admire the Aspen Women's Center's honesty, I find it truly offensive that they imply that if a woman wants a doula, natural birth, or has a birth plan, she is not concerned with the welfare and health of her baby (so much more personal than «unborn child» don't you think?)

If our body was ready to get pregnant, we must do our part to give them our body and our unborn child what it needs to achieve a healthy, full - term pregnancy.

It is AMAZING to me that a woman can choose to KILL her unborn child because she doesn't want responsibility... but a woman who desires to flee from the environment in which she (and quite possibly her baby) was traumatized and has a tragedy occur... then she's just a negligent murderer.

Most moms do what «sbest for their kids.And yes, there are women out there who legitimately can not bf, so formula is a WONDERFUL choice for them.I exclusively bf both of mine, but think it's okay to ff if you don't have enough milk.there are other situations where i think it's selfish.As for drugs during pregnancy and birth, I had to take 3 doses of medication while pregnant so that I could eat.my morning sickness was so bad I couldn't even keep water down.I made the choice to do that so I didn't starve my unborn child, but I only took what was neccessary to keep something down, and then had no other drugs and plan not to until my son is done bf.And as for the «natural» baby, carcinogens are EVERYWHERE, even in your organic food.in this industrialized world you can not get away from them, and to attack other moms for their choices is a sad statement of your morality and on how your child's persoality is going to turn out.also, having multiple kids is definately more demanding than one.