Sentences with phrase «unborn child if»

The effects of Paxil on an unborn child if taken during pregnancy can be severe.

In 1 BC, a Roman citizen wrote to his wife telling her to kill her unborn child if it turned out to be a girl.

To do so would be to neglect the reality that her choice — whatever it becomes — impacts the lives of her family, her boyfriend Tom, Tom's family, her unborn child if she is pregnant, her schoolmates, her youth group at church and potentially many others whose lives intersect with hers.

Everything we read these days tells us that we're harming our unborn children if we eat anything that contains aspartame, refined sugar, or processed cornstarch.

Not exact matches

here in America they want to protect the unborn baby but if that child is born with a pre existing condition or illness then it's on its on because they're not going to pay for that childs possible lifetime medical care.

Abortion is «tragic,» but a woman should always be free to choose if the unborn child lives or dies.

So if those human beings feel that flying airplanes in to buildings, or torturing other humans, or killing their unborn children is right, they can.

But when that manifestation of disoriented tenderness occurs again as dissipated by an almost universal acceptance of abortion, Mother Teresa is right to say (as Percy quotes her): «If a mother can kill her unborn child, I can kill you, and you can kill me.»

If we put a price tag on physical stature, intelligence, race, or eye or hair color, as well as relative freedom from disease, our unborn children will become commodities.

If you support the murder of unborn children, you're not Catholic, period.

Suppose your unborn child was determined in the first trimester to be grossly malformed, unlikely to live, possibly to kill you during pregnancy; and if if it did live without killing you, to have a life of severe pain and suffering with the hope of nothing resembling, or even close to, normal life.

If an unborn child is a human being, it doesn't belong to you, unless of course you believe in slavery.

If they didn't find a couple willing to adopt the unborn child by the end of day, they would abort it, according to the priest.

Unfortunately, they don't have the sense of autonomy that would lead them to refuse sex if their own life - chances (as well as those of their as - yet - unborn children) are in danger of being damaged by male reluctance to use the simple means of contraception readily available.

If we give X a right to do as she wants, and she wants to get an abortion, we must soon face the question of protecting her from Y, who wants to protect the rights of unborn children.

So... if the country is about half pro-life and half pro-choice, but» (90 %) of unborn children diagnosed with Down syndrome are now aborted,» that means that the vast majority of pro-lifers would rather have an abortion than a child with Down syndrome.

@ tom tom: i guess we're carrying on a double conversation now... 1) if the unborn child is a living being, it's murder.

The Journal of Medical Ethics has an entire symposium on infanticide in its latest issue, in which one can see scholars at prominent institutions reasoning (plausibly, alas) that if the unborn child can be licitly aborted, then «after - birth abortion» can be permitted as well.

If he knowingly commits a post-24 weeks abortion, based on such stringent life and health criteria, the doctor must certify his judgment about the threat in writing; acquire the concurrence of a second doctor in that judgment based on a «separate personal medical examination» of the woman; perform the abortion in a hospital; employ procedures designed to maximize the unborn child's chances to survive; and have a second physician present, ready to consider any surviving child his primary patient.

The Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act provides that unless a physician can establish that he «reasonably believes» an unborn child is younger than 24 weeks, or, if the child is older, he can establish that continuing the pregnancy will result in either the death of the mother or «the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function,» the physician can not perform a late - term abortion.

That seems to me the same issue as the abortion decision, except that the unborn child has a great deal longer to live if you don't press that particular button.

Only when I thought either Jennifer or my unborn child — or even both — could die did I realize how important they were and how destroyed my life would be if I lost them.

How as a Christian can you question another Christian who plans to have an abortion if they believe their God has spoken to them and already deemed that their unborn child will be a sinner and that they should have the abortion and let Him take over?

But on the side of the goal of «every unborn child protected in law and welcomed in life» is moral truth, and what we must hope is the enduring, if sometimes inarticulate, decency of most Americans.

Perhaps the humanity of the unborn child that everyone instinctively recognises is easier to suppress if you don't wake up in the night feeling a baby turning somersaults inside you nor be expected to accept chronic sickness because taking anti-nausea drugsmight harm the tiny life you are incubating.

«If [justice] must be accorded to the unborn child, as it must,» the editors write, «it must also be accorded to the mother, and, yes, even to the Catholic politician who tries to balance competing rights and claims in a pluralistic society.

She has reasons for her decision, do you think she is evil if she chooses to kill her unborn child?

Yet if I say that it's just a happy coincidence, am I taking away from the miracle and the glory for God's mighty act for a seemingly small and ordinary woman and her unborn child?

If, as an unintended consequence of saving the mother's life, her unborn child loses its life, that should be viewed as a profoundly, deeply sad, and regrettable, but lawful outcome.»

Given RCAR's insistence that there is no unborn «child,» it would seem that they are compassionately willing to go along with what they believe is a lie if it makes people feel better.

«There is substantial medical evidence that an unborn child is capable of experiencing pain at least by 20 weeks after fertilization, if not earlier,» states H.R. 36, introduced by Arizona Republican Trent Franks.

And if so, surely similar denials of personhood could be applied to unborn children who are not yet «sentient», the severely mentally disabled, people in comas or persistent vegetative states, and indeed anyone in a very deep sleep.

If, however, the unborn child is just a collection of matter, essentially indistinguishable from a woman's appendix, then abortion is more ethically akin to birth control, if not simply a matter of moral indifferencIf, however, the unborn child is just a collection of matter, essentially indistinguishable from a woman's appendix, then abortion is more ethically akin to birth control, if not simply a matter of moral indifferencif not simply a matter of moral indifference.

If accepted, they risk compromising the vital public, ecumenical, and prophetic witness of Christians to the dignity and rights of unborn children.

If the unborn child is a living human being, then abortion is nothing less than the killing of an innocent life.

NO - does it violate the hypocratic oath doctors and nurses have to take if they allow a mother to suffer to attempt to save the unborn child?

This means that if you could legally do something with a born child, you'd be able to do that same thing legally with an unborn child.

If you're very worried about protecting your unborn child, you can simply avoid painting during the first trimester.

Although I admire the Aspen Women's Center's honesty, I find it truly offensive that they imply that if a woman wants a doula, natural birth, or has a birth plan, she is not concerned with the welfare and health of her baby (so much more personal than «unborn child» don't you think?)

If our body was ready to get pregnant, we must do our part to give them our body and our unborn child what it needs to achieve a healthy, full - term pregnancy.

Smoking is much less of an issue today as it was with my first child, but if necessary, protect her and your unborn child from other people's recklessness.

Most moms do what «sbest for their kids.And yes, there are women out there who legitimately can not bf, so formula is a WONDERFUL choice for them.I exclusively bf both of mine, but think it's okay to ff if you don't have enough milk.there are other situations where i think it's selfish.As for drugs during pregnancy and birth, I had to take 3 doses of medication while pregnant so that I could eat.my morning sickness was so bad I couldn't even keep water down.I made the choice to do that so I didn't starve my unborn child, but I only took what was neccessary to keep something down, and then had no other drugs and plan not to until my son is done bf.And as for the «natural» baby, carcinogens are EVERYWHERE, even in your organic food.in this industrialized world you can not get away from them, and to attack other moms for their choices is a sad statement of your morality and on how your child's persoality is going to turn out.also, having multiple kids is definately more demanding than one.

If you decide to breastfeed while pregnant, it is essential that you eat well for the health of your nursing child and your unborn child.

Take the pregnant 32 - year - old, for instance, who loses her shit over getting her unborn child onto a Pre-K waiting list («I don't have an attitude, I'm just saying if there is a spot available...» she says into the phone).

However, if a mother is pregnant and finds herself a victim of domestic violence, it could pose a threat to a mom's life and her unborn child.

If you are eating healthy nutritious meals, your body does take good care of you, your unborn child and the child who is nursing.

If you are well - nourished you should have no difficulty providing for both your nursing child and your unborn baby, especially if your older child is more than one year olIf you are well - nourished you should have no difficulty providing for both your nursing child and your unborn baby, especially if your older child is more than one year olif your older child is more than one year old.

If you question the effects of anger on your unborn baby then you must be treading softly or fearful of harming your child.

It continued: «We uphold that there is a fundamental difference between abortion, and necessary medical treatments that are carried out to save the life of the mother, even if such treatment results in the loss of life of her unborn child.

How beautiful if all of you could be together and speak with one voice especially for the future of young ones and unborn children butyou are struggling to outdo each other.