Sentences with phrase «unborn children at»

Several states, including Indiana, have passed statutes allowing wrongful death claims for unborn children at various stages of gestation, and courts in other states have recognized causes of action related to fetal death.

Studies have shown that dieting in pregnancy changes your unborn child at the cellular level.

For those of us that consciously chose the option, it certainly wasn't about a masochistic desire to suffer more or to put ourselves or our unborn child at risk.

Many substances contain unseen elements to amplify their addictive qualities, may muddle an expectant mother's thinking, and overall put an unborn child at a significant disadvantage.

David believes the visions are the result of Eveleigh coming off her meds, while her new friend Sadie (Gillian Jacobs), also pregnant, is horrified to think that Eveleigh would put her unborn child at risk by taking anti-depressants.

Is the mother and unborn child at a greater risk of harm if the mother's rights to an abortion are denied?

Not exact matches

Women who are pregnant are at risk of passing along the Zika infection to their unborn children.

At the time pursuing a PhD in electrical and computer engineering at U of T, Frey and his wife at the time learned that their unborn child showed signs of a serious genetic disordeAt the time pursuing a PhD in electrical and computer engineering at U of T, Frey and his wife at the time learned that their unborn child showed signs of a serious genetic disordeat U of T, Frey and his wife at the time learned that their unborn child showed signs of a serious genetic disordeat the time learned that their unborn child showed signs of a serious genetic disorder.

He said that at young age he «fell in love» with an ultrasound image of his unborn child.

They talk about an attack on religious teachings while speaking at an NRA event about how abortion is murdering unborn children while at the same time wanting to go to war and bomb thousands of innocent men, women, children, as well as innocent pregnant women with unborn babies.

At his sentencing today, Scott Roeder - the man who killed Kansas abortion provider George Tiller last year - gave a long, scriptural - laden defense of the slaying, arguing that he was protecting unborn children and obeying a higher law by killing the doctor.

But the great and encouraging consequence of this breakthrough is that the humanity of the unborn child, even at the earliest embryonic stage of development, is now a subject of polite conversation even in the circles that so fanatically resisted acknowledging the facts of life.

It is about fundin other more controversial «birth control» products that take the life of unborn children (you have to remember the perspective here that there is an underlying belief that life begins at conception).

Causing the death of an unborn child is in the Bible, for in the Bible at Exodus 21, it says that «in case men should struggle with each other and they really hurt a pregnant woman and her children do come out but no fatal accident occurs, he is to have damages imposed upon him without fail according to what the owner of the woman may lay upon him; and he must give it through the justices.

Under current law it is legal to murder an unborn child ONLY before the age of «viability», the point at which the unborn child can survive outside the womb.

= > that's a reasonable argument (I disagree with it), but as the amendment only has the affect of reducing the age at which the unborn childs rights are respected, the only point to debate is what age it should be.

Humbly, respectfully and prophetically, she petitioned for a religious freedom to uphold and support the sacredness of every at - risk, unborn child, saying, «I want the child.

We arent talking about a new situation wrt the law, we are only talking about reducing the age at which the rights of the unborn child are respected.

The abortionist points a finger at a unborn child and the words «you are a nuiscence and a burden.»

To do so would be to neglect the reality that her choice — whatever it becomes — impacts the lives of her family, her boyfriend Tom, Tom's family, her unborn child if she is pregnant, her schoolmates, her youth group at church and potentially many others whose lives intersect with hers.

He explained: «Since then, 8,894,355 abortions have been carried out, and at least that number of unborn children have lost their lives.

Hence the liberties that permit one to purchase lavender bed clothes, to gaze fervently at pornography, to become a Unitarian, to market popular celebrations of brutal violence, or to destroy one's unborn child are all equally intrinsically «good» because all are expressions of an inalienable freedom of choice.

Then five - year - old Ryland Ward was part of a Sunday morning service at First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs in which a gunman stormed in and killed 26 people, including an unborn child.

Colleague of mine, a pastor who is expecting a child, had a male pastor come up to her at a conference and ask to lay hands on her belly and bless her unborn child.

First, as I note at Public Discourse today in» Kermit Gosnell and the Logic of «Pro-Choice,»» the most up - to - the - minute philosophers in bioethics are dispensing with any «sharp distinction,» as Jon puts it, between the unborn child and the one who has been born.

The Journal of Medical Ethics has an entire symposium on infanticide in its latest issue, in which one can see scholars at prominent institutions reasoning (plausibly, alas) that if the unborn child can be licitly aborted, then «after - birth abortion» can be permitted as well.

Why is there a pair of pro-life billboards where I live that say «When you are at the pearly gates and God asks you «did you protect unborn children» what will your answer be?»

In Parliament, Jim Dobbin campaigned for a reduction in the upper limit at which women may abort their unborn child, from 24 to 13 weeks.

And it has been understood that the pro-choice position is that the life or death of the unborn child is a private matter to be decided at the sole discretion of the mother - for any reason and at any point of the child's life up through the moment of being born.

Every thoughtful person has understood that the pro-life position - explicitly and consistently articulated by the Catholic Church at every level of teaching authority - is that justice requires that every unborn child be cared for andprotected in law.

We see the consequences of this quite regularly at the Cardinal Winning Pro-Life Initiative when women in crisis pregnancies weigh up the benefits of keeping their unborn child with that of holding on to a second car or a Sky box.

Pro-choice advocates have trained their focus on the rights of the mother, and attempted to sidestep the rights of the unborn child by using dehumanizing terms that at least downplay the child's personhood.

It is false and pernicious to claim that the unborn child is, at early stages of development, only a potential human being.

Let's look at the mentality of many Christians who believe that when God first destroyed most everyone with his purported flood, that he had already deemed those that were to perish as sinners, including women and their unborn children.

The prayers include the Magnificat, the familiar «Holy Michael, Archangel, defend us in the day of battle...» and a rather good hymn which can be sung to the tune of Come, Holy Ghost and is specifically aimed at begging for protection on unborn children.

we have new regulation after regulation at state level to discourage unborn child murder.

Code § 13A -6-1 (2006) defines «person,» for the purpose of criminal homicide or assaults, to include an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability and specifies that nothing in the act shall make it a crime to perform or obtain an abortion that is otherwise legal.

While we should no doubt seek to do justice to all concerned, one can not help but note the dramatic disparities between what is at stake for the unborn child, the mother, and the politician.

Afterwards they are invited (everything is by invitation; there is no coercion at any point) to tell their own abortion story, to connect the pains of the past with the present; and in the telling of these stories, damaged relationships with God, with the unborn child, with family members and the Church are also addressed.

At least when we have s e x and unborn child doesn't end up in an abortion clinic trash can.

Therefore, in recognition of the biological reality that human life begins at the moment of fertilization, the unborn child is enti.tled to the protection of the law under all circu.mstances and at every stage of pregnancy.

Therefore, in recognition of the biological reality that human life begins at the moment of fertilization, the unborn child is ent.itled to the protection of the law under all circu.mstances and at every stage of pregnancy.

The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children has been told it can no longer have a stand at an event... More

The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children has been told it can no longer have a stand at an event for new students of Dundee University.

At the local level, pro-life leaders are connecting the mission of the Church and the centrality of the Gospel to advocacy for unborn children and their mothers.

The House voted 237 - 189 in favor of the Pain - Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which targets late - term abortions at the point where pro-life advocates argue that babies can feel pain in utero.

At stake are medical treatments for and the fate of many unborn children in the mid-to-late second trimester.

«There is substantial medical evidence that an unborn child is capable of experiencing pain at least by 20 weeks after fertilization, if not earlier,» states H.R. 36, introduced by Arizona Republican Trent Franks.

Still, not everyone agrees that a zygote or a fetus has a soul, and there is disagreement even among the most ardent pro-life supporters about the exact point at which an unborn child qualifies as a human being.

«This decision will save lives, will encourage the hundreds of thousands of men and women who will march on Washington this week [at the Jan. 27 March for Life] for the rights of unborn children, along with millions more around the country who believe that foreign aid should promote life, not end it,» stated Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC), in a written release.