The findings contained in the Institute's final report will be the first empirical data gathered in Canada on the efficacy of
unbundling as an access to justice strategy, and should be applicable throughout the country.
Not exact matches
Unbundling (or limited scope representation
as it is commonly referred
to in the U.S.) is becoming more recognized and highlighted
as a key tool
to increase
access to justice, particularly for those who do not qualify for legal aid services but can not afford full representation (the CBA, NAC and Macfarlane reports for example).
Much of the research and writing on
access to justice issues in the last five years, including that of the Canadian Bar Association and Julie Macfarlane's National Self - Represented Litigants Project, has discussed
unbundling as a potential, albeit partial, remedy.
The ABA has begun
to encourage lawyers
to offer
unbundled legal services
as a way
to boost
access to justice, even providing standard contracts called limited scope engagement agreements that detail the specific tasks
to be completed by the lawyer.
I realize that cost is often a major impediment
to access to justice, hence I accept legal aid clients and Cba referrals
as well
as offer
unbundled services, all on a case by case basis.
Unbundled legal services, also called limited - scope representation, has gained traction in recent years
as a way
to increase
access to justice and reduce the cost of legal services.
The concept of
unbundled legal services has been recognized
as a measure
to improve
access to justice for those who fall into the wide and growing gap between Canadians who can afford full representation and those who qualify for legal aid.
Even the legal services community who for years has called for only full service representation for all is now starting
to promote
unbundling as one of the major ways we can improve
access to justice in our country.
She voices her concern that
unbundling legal services should not be viewed
as a one - size - fits - all solution
to access to justice or a way for
justice stakeholders
to avoid providing full representation where necessary.
Unbundled legal service, also called limited scope representation, has emerged
as a model
to create more affordable services, increase
access to justice, and provide a broader base of clients
to practitioners.
Across the board, there was concurrence that there is a crisis of legal affordability and that
unbundled legal services are needed
as one way
to address a lack of
access to justice and lack of
access to legal services.
Unbundling (or limited scope representation
as it is commonly referred
to in the U.S.) is becoming more recognized and highlighted
as a key tool
to increase
access to justice, particularly for those who do not qualify for legal aid services but can not afford full representation (the CBA, NAC... [more]