Not exact matches
Is it more rational to believe the universe popped into existence
out of nowhere completely
uncaused, or that it was caused by a powerful and intelligent mind?
'' Is it more rational to believe the universe popped into existence
out of nowhere completely
uncaused»
Contrary to the determinists, who see all events as the predictable result of antecedent causes, physical indeterminists insist that at the sub-atomic level there are happenings which are «
uncaused,» arising spontaneously and unpredictably
out of a mysterious depth to which our science of causes can not penetrate.
If nothing exists beyond the universe and All of the universe, space and time itself came into existence some 13.75 billion years ago then All of the universe, space and time itself came into existence
uncaused,
out of non-being.
Not fair to cheat and just make intelligence an a priori infinitely improbable characteristic of your infinite eternity and explain the visible Universe however improbable you want to judge it in ignorance, with the an even less probable
uncaused cause judged in even greater ignorance as it is
out there where it can not even in principle be observed, slipping the pea neatly under the shell.