I'd like to see the graphics with
uncertainty bars so as to understand a bit more on how close the CRU and the project lay against each other.
Not exact matches
They demand my
uncertainties so that they can prove that their answer is within my error
bars, but don't realize that they also have error
bars.
IntCal13 and priors produce a well - hammered - out collective curve that shows every participating study ON the graph, with
uncertainty bars,
so the scientists can see exactly what studies went into the curve at the radiocarbon age in question.
So, here's a question, VikingExplorer: If, as you have it, unique solutions are not central to physical meaning in science, what's the point of physical error
bars and
uncertainty intervals?
Concerning volume: If it's not taken by IPCC (I did not read the draft and also, there will surely be modifications) then for the simple reason, that it can not be measured directly and
so any data have a pretty wide
uncertainty bar and are open to attack.
So in this case, the expected feedback forcing will rise, and there may well be greater
uncertainty bars.