It's risk assessment theory that is the more appropriate mode of thinking in debating the risks of CO2, knowing what we know about risk /
uncertainty of the carbon cycle, paleo - research, modelling, observations, etc..
The technique includes the determination of
uncertainty of carbon stores throughout the country, which is essential for decision makers.
«The certainty and transparency of a carbon tax that is revenue - neutral will drive innovation much faster than
the uncertainties of carbon trading,» he said.
Not exact matches
«A rejection
of the fourth
carbon budget risks turning
uncertainty into a spiral
of doubt,» he wrote.
In a 1968 report prepared for API in New York City, SRI scientists Elmer Robinson and R.C. Robbins acknowledged some
uncertainty concerning the relation between
carbon emissions and rising temperatures, yet said
carbon dioxide was the most likely cause
of the «greenhouse effect.»
Therefore, Caldeira said, the more important question - and one
of the largest sources
of uncertainty in climate models - is «will the end
of oil usher in a century
of coal, or will it usher in a transition toward low -
carbon - emitting technologies?»
Three approaches were used to evaluate the outstanding «
carbon budget» (the total amount
of CO2 emissions compatible with a given global average warming) for 1.5 °C: re-assessing the evidence provided by complex Earth System Models, new experiments with an intermediate - complexity model, and evaluating the implications
of current ranges
of uncertainty in climate system properties using a simple model.
The scientists also identified
carbon fluxes where further research would be needed to reduce
uncertainties, including the exchange
of carbon between shelf waters and the open ocean.
A new paper, co-authored by Woods Hole Research Center Senior Scientist Richard A. Houghton, entitled, «Audit
of the global
carbon budget: estimate errors and their impact on uptake
uncertainty,» was published in the journal Biogeosciences.
David Fahey, an atmospheric scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado, said that the researchers will need to do additional analyses to reduce the «significant
uncertainties associated with the role
of black
carbon in the climate.»
Because
of those
uncertainties, researchers can estimate only that doubling atmospheric
carbon dioxide from preindustrial levels would increase global temperature between 1 °C and 5 °C.
As promising as it sounds, there are many
uncertainties about whether solidifying
carbon dioxide emissions could be a viable part
of a climate strategy, said Bert Metz, a fellow at the European Climate Foundation who is unaffiliated with the study and was the lead author
of a 2005 IPCC special report on
carbon capture.
Reliable
uncertainty estimates are needed for the prioritisation
of research relating to the development
of greenhouse gas inventories and for the assessment
of the importance
of emission sources and
carbon sinks.
Therefore, it is important that, in addition to the size
of the
carbon sink, we also know what kind
of uncertainties pertain to the figures reported,» Lehtonen says.
This seemed to have little effect on the total
uncertainty of the litter input, but the
uncertainty of the upland soil
carbon sink estimate multiplied.
«IPCC guidelines lead to an underestimation
of uncertainty of forest
carbon sink estimates.»
(C) potential metrics and approaches for quantifying the climatic effects
of black
carbon emissions, including its radiative forcing and warming effects, that may be used to compare the climate benefits
of different mitigation strategies, including an assessment
of the
uncertainty in such metrics and approaches; and
«(A) the technical capacity to monitor, measure, report, and verify forest
carbon fluxes for all significant sources
of greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation with an acceptable level
of uncertainty, as determined taking into account relevant internationally accepted methodologies, such as those established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change;
So, now instead
of carbon listed as being 12.0107 atomic mass units with a measurement
uncertainty of about 0.0008, it has an official atomic weight
of [12.0096; 12.0116], where the brackets and semicolon indicate an interval
of atomic weights.
For example, the authors acknowledge the role
of aerosols in stimulating clouds to form and the darkening
of snow and ice by black
carbon, adding that there is still too much
uncertainty to include fully in their calculations.
We enable our members to capture opportunities, mitigate risks and manage
uncertainties of global
carbon policy.
There are still large
uncertainties regarding the
carbon budget due to lack
of understanding
of how the climate operates and lack
of knowledge
of how successful future climate policy will be.
«The inertia in the climate system makes it possible to predict, within model
uncertainty, changes in flood hazards up to the year 2040, independent
of the specific
carbon emission pathway that is chosen by society within the next 25 years.»
M2009 use a simplified
carbon cycle and climate model to make a large ensemble
of simulations in which principal
uncertainties in the
carbon cycle, radiative forcings, and climate response are allowed to vary, thus yielding a probability distribution for global warming as a function
of time throughout the 21st century.
Addressing these three broad areas
of climate change research in reverse order: -(3) The anthropogenic origin
of the rise in atmospheric CO2 levels is questioned because the levels
of uncertainty of the size
of natural fluxes within the
carbon cycle are seen as too large for such a conclusion to be made.
I'm especially interested in finding out (1) the extent (volume and mass)
of the atmosphere into which the
carbon mass was added and (2) the ranges
of uncertainty associated with both the extent
of the atmosphere and the mass
of carbon produced.
It is my understanding that the
uncertainties regarding climate sensitivity to a nominal 2XCO2 forcing is primarily a function
of the
uncertainties in (1) future atmospheric aerosol concentrations; both sulfate - type (cooling) and black
carbon - type (warming), (2) feedbacks associated with aerosol effects on the properties
of clouds (e.g. will cloud droplets become more reflective?)
The review, which is being published in the journal Science on Friday, concludes that the human - driven buildup
of carbon dioxide under way now appears to be far outpacing past natural events, meaning that, for ocean chemistry particularly, the biological implications are potentially enormous — and laden with the kind
of uncertainty that is hard to see as a source
of comfort.
Firms want a fair degree
of price certainty in long - term investment decisions, and the allocation
of carbon - based assets (like permits) make a reduction
of permits in circulation in response to reductions in scientific
uncertainty somewhat problematic.
Potential
carbon cycle feedbacks (which are generally expected to be amplifying) go into the temperature responses and their
uncertainty is a big part
of the ranges given.
ESTIMATING THE PERMAFROST -
CARBON FEEDBACK ON GLOBAL WARMING A key uncertainty is the fraction of carbon that might be decomposed under anaerobic conditions — resulting potentially in methane emissions to the atmos
CARBON FEEDBACK ON GLOBAL WARMING A key
uncertainty is the fraction
of carbon that might be decomposed under anaerobic conditions — resulting potentially in methane emissions to the atmos
carbon that might be decomposed under anaerobic conditions — resulting potentially in methane emissions to the atmosphere.
The bottom line is that
uncertainties in the physics
of aerosol effects (warming from black
carbon, cooling from sulphates and nitrates, indirect effects on clouds, indirect effects on snow and ice albedo) and in the historical distributions, are really large (as acknowledged above).
Response: I think these, what they would call
carbon cycle feedbacks, are a major source
of uncertainty.
As I read Chapter 10.4.1
of AR4 WG1 it is addressing the
uncertainty introduced by
carbon cycle feed backs into those predictions.
Re # 128, CGMs do not currently include the
carbon cycle, so your concern is not with the models as they now exist but with the
uncertainties of the forcings which are applied to them.
James Murdoch, the young scion
of the giant News Corporation media empire, has an op - ed article for The Washington Post aimed at «conservation - minded conservatives,» spelling out the many reasons to propel an energy transformation in the United States through a declining cap on
carbon dioxide emissions, despite the
uncertainties in climate science.
Permit prices, since they would be more volatile over time than a specified tax trajectory, would mask the critical long - term signal that
carbon will always be more expensive next year than it is today; that is, unavoidable volatility in permit prices would raise the economic cost
of any climate target by clouding investment decisions with another source
of uncertainty.
I was wondering for some time now, how much the findings
of the work
of scientists, be it the IPCC, be it the PIK in Potsdam or what have you, can be taken for granted in order for policy makers to make valuable decisions (e.g. cutting
carbon emissions by half by 2050) and if the
uncertainties in the models might outweigh certain decisions to reduce
carbon emissions so that in the end it might happen that these
uncertainties make these decisions obsolete, because they do not suffice to avoid «dangerous climate change»?
There is
uncertainty in the climate sensitivity
of the Earth and in the response
of the
carbon cycle, and the papers are extremely useful in the way that they propagate these
uncertainties to the probabilities
of different amounts
of warming.
China, ending months
of uncertainty, said it would pursue policies that result in a peak in its
carbon dioxide emissions around 2030, with «the intention»
of trying to peak earlier, and to increase the non-fossil fuel share
of all energy to around 20 percent by 2030.
Pressing the frontiers
of climate science and related research is vital, but it's wishful thinking to expect further science to substantially narrow
uncertainties on time scales that matter when it comes to regional or short - term climate forecasting, the range
of possible warming from a big buildup
of carbon dioxide, the impact
of greenhouse forcing on rare extremes and the like.
Although
uncertainties still linger, the technical sub-committee that focused on REDD for the two years leading up to Bali concluded not only that the magnitude
of deforestation emissions was significant — approximately 20 %
of global emissions — but that sufficiently cost - effective methodologies exist for measuring forest
carbon and monitoring deforestation.
«Through our work with the U.S. forest sector, we have seen the importance
of reducing
uncertainty for
carbon market participants to encourage participation,» said Jad Daley, climate program director at The Trust for Public Land.
While these latter techniques might have even more
uncertainties surrounding them than do bioenergy / forestry approaches, many scientists still think that it is worthwhile conducting further research on these systems to learn how they might broaden the portfolio
of feasible, sustainable, and scalable
carbon removal solutions in the future.
Jane Burston, Head
of the Centre for
Carbon Measurement at the National Physical Laboratory, spoke to Climate Action about how the NPL is reducing
uncertainty in climate data and helping to develop low
carbon technologies.
The
uncertainties observed in estimates
of forest
carbon stocks demonstrate the urgent need for improved Earth observation tools to support climate change policy development, say Isabella Bovolo and Daniel Donoghue
For example, many projections that include
carbon removal solutions involve the large - scale deployment
of bioenergy systems, yet critical
uncertainties remain around our estimates
of:
«Although such estimates
of future deployment
of carbon - free energy sources indicate that it may be possible to achieve a decarbonized energy system, great
uncertainties remain regarding the implementation
of such scenarios due to factors such as costs, technology evolution, public policies, and barriers to deployment
of new technologies (NRC, 2010b)»
Early fossil energy with CCS projects can prove critical for examining
uncertainties pertinent both to fossil CCS and
carbon removal CCS (such as geologic storage concerns), as well as for helping to bring down costs related to the development
of both fossil and renewable CCS projects.
Clearly, further research into the
carbon cycle will be essential to reduce the level
of uncertainty about the climate system's response to CO2 emissions.For further reading: R. T. Watson et al.: «Green - house gases and aero - sols» in Houghton et al., «Climate Change, the IPCC Scientific Assess - ment», Cambridge (1990).